Jump to content

Thai Political Parties Face Dissolution Threat Over Thaksin Allegations


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Bright future for Thailand then ???

Maybe not.

I'm afraid the army would step in .

If these parties are disbanded I don’t think that the military will directly step in.  After these parties are gone the only ones left will be the pro-military parties with leaders that were in government after the last coup.  The result will be that the military will control the government without actively start coup.

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, statman78 said:

If these parties are disbanded I don’t think that the military will directly step in.  After these parties are gone the only ones left will be the pro-military parties with leaders that were in government after the last coup.  The result will be that the military will control the government without actively start coup.

They will name a PM, a General again. Actually, they have to to prevent people's party to gain power 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Nopparuj accuses the involved parties of failing to limit Thaksin's influence, suggesting that instead of curtailing his activities, party officials—including executives and Cabinet ministers—appear to support him. He stresses the importance of the EC’s intervention to uphold legal integrity.

Interesting that he is the only one bringing these cases.

It's not that Thaksin is particularly clandestine in going about influencing all and sundry.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, ozz1 said:

Just call another election and be done with it too many pigs in the trough

 

An election will not solve this issue, other than possibly lowering the PTP numbers.

 

The problem with all these mini parties of 1 or 2 is that they are there only because of money and influence in specific areas.  They represent one area each.  BJT is an example. Look at where it wins, it is the same places every time  

 

I have no issue with the system, it is what it is, and is not much different than CDN American or any western country.  Consider Canada has a party called the Bloc Québécois that is representative of the province of Quebec and only has the best interests of Québécois. 

 

Labour parties used to be solely representative of working factory workers until they got too big for their own good.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
15 hours ago, ozz1 said:

Just call another election and be done with it too many pigs in the trough

90% of them are pigs, that's the issue.

Kick out one lots another moves in.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

90% of them are pigs, that's the issue.

Kick out one lots another moves in.

Sorry, your maths is wrong. 100% are pigs, and the rest are wannabee pigs.

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 hours ago, JAG said:

Dissolving Nopparuj Vorachitwutthikun ?

 

That won't help, he raises good points and folks should listen to him. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Grusa said:

Sorry, your maths is wrong. 100% are pigs, and the rest are wannabee pigs.

There are some good politicians out there who want to move the country in the right direction.

Not get into power for self enrichment like the incumbent clan 

Posted
12 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

There are some good politicians out there who want to move the country in the right direction.

Not get into power for self enrichment like the incumbent clan 

In my view, the only good politician is a dead politician. What they were before they became politicians is moot.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Grusa said:

In my view, the only good politician is a dead politician.

So how do you propose to run this country? or any other?

Posted
1 minute ago, mfd101 said:

So how do you propose to run this country? or any other?

 

A necessary evil, but its best if the people pick the least evil, not the most evil.

Posted
32 minutes ago, lordgrinz said:

A necessary evil, but its best if the people pick the least evil, not the most evil.

The problem is that perfectly intelligent, honest and reasonable people can have different views on the way forward in the mind-bogglingly complex affairs of a nation-state or a province or a city. And to make headway people have to do deals with others (unless you prefer a dictatorship à la Hun Sen). And the deals inevitably involve calculations about who's up who and who hasn't paid ...

 

Noone has invented anything better as yet.

Posted
2 minutes ago, mfd101 said:

The problem is that perfectly intelligent, honest and reasonable people can have different views on the way forward in the mind-bogglingly complex affairs of a nation-state or a province or a city. And to make headway people have to do deals with others (unless you prefer a dictatorship à la Hun Sen). And the deals inevitably involve calculations about who's up who and who hasn't paid ...

 

Noone has invented anything better as yet.

 

Yup, we have to take the good with the bad, hopefully not too much bad. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...