Well seems to me the fix is in the lady pimp is already enjoying better conditions for????perhaps covering for the adjucated rapist in the White House.

Have Trump’s supporters, both foreign and domestic, woken up

and smelled the coffee yet.

 

Sweet deal given to a woman sex trafficking minors and conspiracy to commit sex crimes against minors.

 

’The kids … The Kids’

The least you can do is post a link. Just how lazy are you?

She can hook up with Elizabeth Holmes.

 

Sweet deal for Maxwell.

8 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

She can hook up with Elizabeth Holmes.

 

Sweet deal for Maxwell.

Doubt she will be there long enough for that.

8 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

The least you can do is post a link. Just how lazy are you?

And just how lazy is foxnews.com? I went to their homepage to see if this was featured there. It's not. Anyway, here are some links:

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/maxwell-moved-to-cushy-new-prison/news-story/d0e1ba70aa87fa1765635ccb19bdf174

https://news.sky.com/story/ghislaine-maxwell-moved-to-a-minimum-security-prison-camp-authorities-say-13405320

 

 

Her last wish was to die in Texas?

Seems like a reasonable decision.  Maximum security accommodations are expensive and should be for violent offenders.  Regardless of how you feel about the woman, there is no violence in her past.

 

5 minutes ago, sham_poo said:

And just how lazy is foxnews.com? I went to their homepage to see if this was featured there. It's not. Anyway, here are some links:

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/maxwell-moved-to-cushy-new-prison/news-story/d0e1ba70aa87fa1765635ccb19bdf174

https://news.sky.com/story/ghislaine-maxwell-moved-to-a-minimum-security-prison-camp-authorities-say-13405320

 

 

I already read the news before tuggie got started. But if you're going to start a thread it's common to attach a link.

Minimum security, maybe a malign force will arrange to terminate her to keep her quiet.

3 minutes ago, impulse said:

Seems like a reasonable decision.  Maximum security accommodations are expensive and should be for violent offenders.  Regardless of how you feel about the woman, there is no violence in her past.

 

 

Minimum security prisons are more porous, so there may be violence in her future.

26 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

The least you can do is post a link. Just how lazy are you?

Unless you're living in a cave with a sack over your head, links are invading EVERYWHERE.

3 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I already read the news before tuggie got started. But if you're going to start a thread it's common to attach a link.

I’m not that computer literate to know how I should learn tho

4 minutes ago, impulse said:

Seems like a reasonable decision.  Maximum security accommodations are expensive and should be for violent offenders.  Regardless of how you feel about the woman, there is no violence in her past.

 

But she wasn't in a maximum security prison. She was in a low-security Federal prison. Which is just one step above to where she was moved to.

1 minute ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

 

Minimum security prisons are more porous, so there may be violence in her future.

I’ve had that same thought myself it would be much easier to get at her no doubt about it.

3 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

 

Minimum security prisons are more porous, so there may be violence in her future.

and death - her death.

11 minutes ago, impulse said:

Seems like a reasonable decision.  Maximum security accommodations are expensive and should be for violent offenders.  Regardless of how you feel about the woman, there is no violence in her past.

 

But kiddie diddling is ok?

1 minute ago, MarkBR said:

and death - her death.

 

Yup.

 

But it also could just be part of the deal she's cut with the DoJ not to rat out Trump and others.

 

But I'll be charitable and believe it is the latter, at least for now.

4 minutes ago, gargamon said:

But kiddie diddling is ok?

 

Did she diddle any kiddies?  I must have missed that part...

 

1 minute ago, impulse said:

 

Did she diddle any kiddies?  I must have missed that part...

 

Yes. Please keep up.

11 minutes ago, annotator said:

But she wasn't in a maximum security prison. She was in a low-security Federal prison. Which is just one step above to where she was moved to.

 

You're splitting hairs there.  She was moved to a lower security (less expensive) accommodation.

7 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

You're splitting hairs there.  She was moved to a lower security (less expensive) accommodation.

Splitting hairs? You don't think there's a huge difference between the costs of a maximum security prison and a minimum security prison? And, of course, you're obviously ignoring the fact that for some reason, now she's been moved to what is called a camp rather than a prison? Your deflection is obvious.

13 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Did she diddle any kiddies?  I must have missed that part...

 

That's like saying that because being an accomplice to a murder isn't as serious a charge as murder, therefore it's not serious at all.

5 minutes ago, sham_poo said:

That's like saying that because being an accomplice to a murder isn't as serious a charge as murder, therefore it's not serious at all.

 

What does that have to do with spending more taxpayer dollars to house a non-violent offender in a more expensive prison?  I'd rather see them reserve the expensive accommodations for violent offenders.  The ones that are more likely to stab the guards and fellow inmates...  She's not a security risk.

 

1 minute ago, impulse said:

 

What does that have to do with spending more taxpayer dollars to house a non-violent offender in a more expensive prison?  I'd rather see them reserve the expensive accommodations for violent offenders.  The ones that are more likely to stab the guards and fellow inmates...  She's not a security risk.

 

Still gaslighting? Still ignoring the fact that all of a sudden she's moved to a prison after her interview? And the fact is that she was already in a minimum security prison. So the savings can't have been much. 

Certainly easier and cheaper to "manage" her sentence in what, in the UK, is called an "open prison."

5 minutes ago, annotator said:

Still gaslighting? Still ignoring the fact that all of a sudden she's moved to a prison after her interview? And the fact is that she was already in a minimum security prison. So the savings can't have been much. 

 

They wanted her to testify.  Those were her terms.  Nothing nefarious about that... 

 

Maybe she also got peach cobbler on Tuesdays.

 

Please continue in the topic running in the World News forum:

 

 

//Closed//