If the hint is correct, the Dem  party of Cultural Marxist/Socialist  will/could  lose up to 25 congressional seats.

"The Supreme Court said Friday that it will weigh the constitutionality of a common form of redistricting used to protect the voting power of Black and Hispanic voters: the drawing of congressional districts where racial minorities make up at least half the population.

Experts in election law said the move signals that the court may be poised to further narrow the Voting Rights Act".

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/01/supreme-court-louisiana-redistricting-order-00490390

The Story is based on a Politico report

7 minutes ago, riclag said:

If the hint is correct, the Dem  party of Cultural Marxist/Socialist  will/could  lose up to 25 congressional seats.

"The Supreme Court said Friday that it will weigh the constitutionality of a common form of redistricting used to protect the voting power of Black and Hispanic voters: the drawing of congressional districts where racial minorities make up at least half the population.

Experts in election law said the move signals that the court may be poised to further narrow the Voting Rights Act".

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/01/supreme-court-louisiana-redistricting-order-00490390

The Story is based on a Politico report

 

A significant and major step on the road to destroying democracy in the US........I hope the dumb black and hispanic Trump voters know what they have done.

25 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

dumb black and hispanic Trump voters

 

So says the white man

 

Black man can think for hissef ok Massa Will ? 

 

 

Charlamagne Calls Out Democrats for Dropping ‘Fascist’ Accusation After Harris Loss: ‘How Much Of It Was Just Politics?’

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/charlamagne-calls-out-democrats-for-dropping-fascist-accusation-after-harris-loss-how-much-of-it-was-just-politics/

 

Charlamagne Tha God rethinks whether Trump is a ‘fascist’ after ‘leaderless’ Dems’ actions since election loss 

https://nypost.com/2025/01/18/us-news/charlamagne-tha-god-reassesses-whether-trump-is-a-fascist-after-leaderless-dems-actions-since-election-loss/

 

Charlamagne tha God knocks Democrats 

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/5018308-charlamagne-tha-god-democrats-hunter-biden-pardon/

 

 

Charlamagne tha God, co-host of The Breakfast Club, reaches a significant audience through various platforms. The radio show, syndicated on over 100 stations nationwide, attracts approximately 4.5 to 6 million listeners weekly, with some sources citing up to 8 million monthly listeners,

 

1 minute ago, KhaoHom said:

 

So says the white man

 

Black man can think for hissef ok Massa Will ? 

 

 

Charlamagne Calls Out Democrats for Dropping ‘Fascist’ Accusation After Harris Loss: ‘How Much Of It Was Just Politics?’

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/charlamagne-calls-out-democrats-for-dropping-fascist-accusation-after-harris-loss-how-much-of-it-was-just-politics/

 

Charlamagne Tha God rethinks whether Trump is a ‘fascist’ after ‘leaderless’ Dems’ actions since election loss 

https://nypost.com/2025/01/18/us-news/charlamagne-tha-god-reassesses-whether-trump-is-a-fascist-after-leaderless-dems-actions-since-election-loss/

 

Charlamagne tha God knocks Democrats 

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/5018308-charlamagne-tha-god-democrats-hunter-biden-pardon/

 

 

Charlamagne tha God, co-host of The Breakfast Club, reaches a significant audience through various platforms. The radio show, syndicated on over 100 stations nationwide, attracts approximately 4.5 to 6 million listeners weekly, with some sources citing up to 8 million monthly listeners,

 

 

 

 

Not a clue what that's about, but I greatly appreciate the time and effort you put into it.

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

So says the white man

 

Black man can think for hissef ok Massa Will ? 

 

 

Charlamagne Calls Out Democrats for Dropping ‘Fascist’ Accusation After Harris Loss: ‘How Much Of It Was Just Politics?’

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/charlamagne-calls-out-democrats-for-dropping-fascist-accusation-after-harris-loss-how-much-of-it-was-just-politics/

 

Charlamagne Tha God rethinks whether Trump is a ‘fascist’ after ‘leaderless’ Dems’ actions since election loss 

https://nypost.com/2025/01/18/us-news/charlamagne-tha-god-reassesses-whether-trump-is-a-fascist-after-leaderless-dems-actions-since-election-loss/

 

Charlamagne tha God knocks Democrats 

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/5018308-charlamagne-tha-god-democrats-hunter-biden-pardon/

 

 

Charlamagne tha God, co-host of The Breakfast Club, reaches a significant audience through various platforms. The radio show, syndicated on over 100 stations nationwide, attracts approximately 4.5 to 6 million listeners weekly, with some sources citing up to 8 million monthly listeners,

 

Well researched.

And there you have the rest of the Story.

4 minutes ago, riclag said:

Well researched.

And there you have the rest of the Story.

 

 

Researched.....555

What tickles my hairs its not the skin color .Its the politicians

they/them support ,DEI policies and wokism(racist policies)  will suffer a major defeat similar 

to "affirmative action" .   

 

What tickles my hairs its not the skin color .Its the politicians

they/them support ,DEI policies and wokism(racist policies)  will suffer a major defeat similar 

to "affirmative action" .   

 

Can anyone translate this?

6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

What tickles my hairs its not the skin color .Its the politicians

they/them support ,DEI policies and wokism(racist policies)  will suffer a major defeat similar 

to "affirmative action" .   

 

Can anyone translate this?

Yes.

The you’s/who’s wokie policies are going down the tubes same as affirmative action did.

2 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

 

Not a clue what that's about, but I greatly appreciate the time and effort you put into it.

 

 

 

Leave the poor chap alone - he is just enjoying "trumping" (old English use of the verb to trump) in his echo chamber!

3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

 

Not a clue what that's about, but I greatly appreciate the time and effort you put into it.

 

 

 

Do you think that redrawing congressional districts by race is acceptable? 

7 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Do you think that redrawing congressional districts by race is acceptable? 

 

 

Do you think that redrawing congressional districts to gain an extra 25 Republican seats is acceptable?

 

How about if those districts were redrawn and gave the Dems an extra 25 seats....would that be acceptable?........waiting for your answer...no rush.

2 hours ago, riclag said:

I think if Buckwheat was alive today he'd vote Trump for America.

 

Was he brain damaged as well?

5 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Do you think that redrawing congressional districts to gain an extra 25 Republican seats is acceptable?

 

How about if those districts were redrawn and gave the Dems an extra 25 seats....would that be acceptable?........waiting for your answer...no rush.

 

Why are yiu unable to answer? 

 

So redrawing districts by race is okay, as long as it benefits the party you favor, is that your position?

 

The court is only reviewing the constitutionality of drawing districts by race. 

 

Republicans will lose seats ass well. 

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

 

Why are yiu unable to answer? 

 

So redrawing districts by race is okay, as long as it benefits the party you favor, is that your position?

 

The court is only reviewing the constitutionality of drawing districts by race. 

 

Republicans will lose seats ass well. 

 

Rubbish ....so both sides are losing seats?...how does that work?

 

This is a GOP/SCOTUS effort at gerrymandering.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Rubbish ....so both sides are losing seats?...how does that work?

 

This is a GOP/SCOTUS effort at gerrymandering.

Why are you still unable to answer? 

 

Why do you believe only the left will lose seats if redrawing districts based on race is judged to be unconstitutional? 
 

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Why are you still unable to answer? 

 

Why do you believe only the left will lose seats if redrawing districts based on race is judged to be unconstitutional? 
 

 

 

 

Multiple news reports confirm that Republicans stand to gain seats in the U.S. House of Representatives if congressional boundaries are redrawn—especially in Texas, where GOP lawmakers have proposed a new map that could flip up to five Democratic-held districts.

4 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Multiple news reports confirm that Republicans stand to gain seats in the U.S. House of Representatives if congressional boundaries are redrawn—especially in Texas, where GOP lawmakers have proposed a new map that could flip up to five Democratic-held districts.

So it is your position that drawing districts based on race should be judged constitutional, because the left benefits more from it than does the right, correct?

5 hours ago, riclag said:

If the hint is correct, the Dem  party of Cultural Marxist/Socialist  will/could  lose up to 25 congressional seats.

"The Supreme Court said Friday that it will weigh the constitutionality of a common form of redistricting used to protect the voting power of Black and Hispanic voters: the drawing of congressional districts where racial minorities make up at least half the population.

Experts in election law said the move signals that the court may be poised to further narrow the Voting Rights Act".

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/01/supreme-court-louisiana-redistricting-order-00490390

The Story is based on a Politico report

This is just too good to be true and I will not place too much hope in it but Trump is a winner and he is on a roll. 

11 hours ago, mogandave said:

So it is your position that drawing districts based on race should be judged constitutional, because the left benefits more from it than does the right, correct?

 

So it is your position that drawing districts based on race should be judged racist, because then the right will benefits more from it than does the left, correct?

34 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So it is your position that drawing districts based on race should be judged racist, because then the right will benefits more from it than does the left, correct?

No. It is my position that drawing districts based on race is morally wrong. 

 

I further believe that the court may decide that it is also unconstitutional. 

 

Do you disagree?

 

 

 

Just now, mogandave said:

No. It is my position that drawing districts based on race is morally wrong. 

 

I further believe that the court may decide that it is also unconstitutional. 

 

Do you disagree?

 

 

 

 

The boundaries are drawn to avoid disenfranchising minorities....who in the US, due to institutional racism....all happen to be ethnically distinguishable.......so the boundaries only appear to be drawn based on race.

 

This is what the GOP have jumped on this idea to boost their seats in congress........nothing to do with hand-wringing GOP's worried about boundaries being seen to be racist.

16 hours ago, riclag said:

If the hint is correct, the Dem  party of Cultural Marxist/Socialist  will/could  lose up to 25 congressional seats.

"The Supreme Court said Friday that it will weigh the constitutionality of a common form of redistricting used to protect the voting power of Black and Hispanic voters: the drawing of congressional districts where racial minorities make up at least half the population.

Experts in election law said the move signals that the court may be poised to further narrow the Voting Rights Act".

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/01/supreme-court-louisiana-redistricting-order-00490390

The Story is based on a Politico report

It's all rigged IMHO anyway by the Superpacs that provide funding for those running for re-election anyway and even from different partys, seem to vote in favor of the issues of the rich and powerful every day!

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

The boundaries are drawn to avoid disenfranchising minorities....who in the US, due to institutional racism....all happen to be ethnically distinguishable.......so the boundaries only appear to be drawn based on race.

 

This is what the GOP have jumped on this idea to boost their seats in congress........nothing to do with hand-wringing GOP's worried about boundaries being seen to be racist.

Why is one person’s vote more important than another’s, as long as they are all counted? 

 

Do you approve of segregation with respect to voting? 

 

Do you drawing districts based on race is morally acceptable? 

 

 

Just now, mogandave said:

Why is one person’s vote more important than another’s, as long as they are all counted? 

 

Do you approve of segregation with respect to voting? 

 

Do you drawing districts based on race is morally acceptable? 

 

 

 

 

So you are more than happy for minorities to be subsumed into larger, predominantly white, Trump voting districts simply to gain Republican seats.......US democracy at it's finest.

4 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Why is one person’s vote more important than another’s, as long as they are all counted? 

 

So abolish the electoral college.

This is a numbers game for Republicans which they're going to lose in the end. Apparently defining districts by race favors Democrats because non-white voters favor Democrats. Maybe the Republicans will see the need to stop non-white immigration now? Doubtful but if they don't they are guaranteed to never win another national election in very near future.

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

So you are more than happy for minorities to be subsumed into larger, predominantly white, Trump voting districts simply to gain Republican seats.......US democracy at it's finest.

So you are more than happy to promote institutional racism as long as it benefits the left? 

 

It is amusing how the left goes on about the right dividing the country.

 

 

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

So you are more than happy to promote institutional racism as long as it benefits the left? 

 

It is amusing how the left goes on about the right dividing the country.

 

 

 

How is protecting minorities democratic rights, institutional racism? 

 

It is amusing how the right goes on about there is no racism.......blacks and hispanics don't face any racism....they just need to buck their ideas up.

All those congressional appointment hearing promises to uphold precedents and super precedents where lies under oath.