Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

No I don’t.

 

I expect the police to investigate allegations of such behavior, prosecute such behavior and a Jury in an open court to determine if the alleged crime was indeed committed

 

 

I assume you have watched the video. 

 

What's YOUR opinion? Was he inciting violence in your opinion?

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No I don’t.

 

I expect the police to investigate allegations of such behavior, prosecute such behavior and a Jury in an open court to determine if the alleged crime was indeed committed

 

 

   So, he didnt actually put this finger across his throat in a throat cutting gesture ?

   It was a false accusation ?

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Great to see this political prisoner released. 

 

Never should have spent a single day in jail. 

 

We are living in a very dark period in terms of freedom of speech in the UK. A right winger speaking out against the government's failed immigration policy faces the very real risk of jail time. I hope Lucy and her daughter can get over this disgusting injustice. 

 

 

Unless it's your boy Ricky Jones, right 2 Tier? Been very quiet on that one. 

 

Political prisoner? You are joking right?

Lucy who?

Ricky Jones encouraging throats to be cut.

 

(on a side note public opinion seems to be very much against the verdict in this case, just read the comments below) 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Lucy who?

 

   Billys Wife 

6 minutes ago, Summerinsiam said:

Political prisoner? You are joking right?

 

It's hardly a laughing matter. 

12 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

After conviction? Yes.

 

I do not believe the government should be declaring it's citizens criminals before they are even charged. That's like something from Stalin's Soviet Union. 

 

Ever heard of due process?

It didn’t 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It didn’t 

 

Is gaslighting all you have now? 😃

 

12 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   So, he didnt actually put this finger across his throat in a throat cutting gesture ?

   It was a false accusation ?

Yes he did ‘put his finger across his throat’, the meaning of which is open to interpretation.

 

A jury in an open court of law determined that it wasn’t a criminal act.

6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Is gaslighting all you have now? 😃

 

Where every single one of those arrested people charged with criminal acts?

If not then it cannot be claimed the Government was stating guilt for those arrested.

 

Many were charged and the majority charged where found guilty and/or admitted their guilt.

 

Thereafter they faced ‘the full force of the law’.

 

Nobody who was arrested but not charged ‘faced the full force of the law’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yes he did ‘put his finger across his throat’, the meaning of which is open to interpretation.

 

How else could you interpret it? 😃

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14997585/Labour-councillor-Ricky-Jones-jury-wasnt-thinking-upset-overwhelmed-crowd-cut-throats-protesters.html

 

20 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I assume you have watched the video. 

 

What's YOUR opinion? Was he inciting violence in your opinion?

I didn’t watch the video.

 

I don’t need to.

 

I read the jury verdict.

 

Case closed!

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

If not then it cannot be claimed the Government was stating guilt for those arrested.

 

 

The government was labelling them criminals before they were tried and convicted.

 

Where is the due process?

 

10 minutes ago, sungod said:

Ricky Jones encouraging throats to be cut.

 

(on a side note public opinion seems to be very much against the verdict in this case, just read the comments below) 

 

 

 

 

    What I find really weird is that Palestinians ,  Nazis , Woman and Children all get a mention in the video  .

   Those four categories seem to go together and frequently get a group mention .

   Its like people are getting brainwashed into keep mentioning those four categories 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

I didn’t watch the video.

 

I don’t need to.

 

I read the jury verdict.

 

Case closed!

 

Typical mealy mouthed, dishonest response that I expected. 

 

If you have to lie Chomps, you might be on the wrong side. 😃

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

The government was labelling them criminals before they were tried and convicted.

 

Where is the due process?

 

Clearly the Government were not.

 

As evidence by the fact many arrested were not charged.

 

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Clearly the Government were not.

 

Yes they were.

 

Stop lieing.

 

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Typical mealy mouthed, dishonest response that I expected. 

 

If you have to lie Chomps, you might be on the wrong side. 😃

It’s a response based of FACTS.

 

Please point out the lies in my post:

 

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I didn’t watch the video.

 

I don’t need to.

 

I read the jury verdict.

 

Case closed!

I won’t hold my breath.

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yes he did ‘put his finger across his throat’, the meaning of which is open to interpretation.

 

 

Whilst saying that all their throats should be cut? How would that be open to interpretation? 

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Yes they were.

 

Stop lieing.

 

Except for the arrested individuals who were never charged of any crime.

 

You know the one who are not criminals.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Except for the arrested individuals who were never charged of any crime.

 

You know the one who are not criminals.

 

So why did the government label them criminals?

 

 

 

Just now, sungod said:

Whilst saying that all their throats should be cut? How would that be open to interpretation? 

I don’t know, I don’t have access to the Jury’s deliberations.

 

Acquitted.

 

Case closed.

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s a response based of FACTS.

 

Please point out the lies in my post:

 

I won’t hold my breath.

 

You've seen the video. 

 

You know exactly what was said. 

 

 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t know, I don’t have access to the Jury’s deliberations.

 

Acquitted.

 

Case closed.

 

How do you personally interpret someone drawing a finger across their throats whilst calling for all their throats to be cut? 

34 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If you’ve got a point to make, then make it.

 

Or are all your opinions gift wrapped for you?

 

You are no expert on the law and neither am I. 

For me to answer would take several hundred words which you probably wouldn't read, so its far easier to  listen to someone who actually knows what he is talking about! I have listened to the BBB and I agree with him!

Surely getting all the facts from someone who know them is prudent, before making an informed opinion?

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

You've seen the video. 

 

You know exactly what was said. 

 

There you go again making assumptions, it’s something you often do.

 

I’ve not seen the video.

 

I have seen the Jury’s verdict.

 

Just now, mikeymike100 said:

You are no expert on the law and neither am I. 

For me to answer would take several hundred words which you probably wouldn't read, so its far easier to  listen to someone who actually knows what he is talking about! I have listened to the BBB and I agree with him!

Surely getting all the facts from someone who know them is prudent, before making an informed opinion?

 

 

 

The only thing I need to know about the law in this case is the defendant pled not guilty and therefore was tried in an open Crown Court before a Jury.

 

The Jury saw the evidence, heard testimony, heard the prosecution case, heard the defense case.

 

Deliberated on what was presented and acquitted the accused.

 

I also know acquittal is case closed.

 

I think trial in open court in front of a jury is a great system, not perfect, but far better than trial by anonymous posters on Internet forums.

 

 

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

There you go again making assumptions, it’s something you often do.

 

I’ve not seen the video.

 

I have seen the Jury’s verdict.

 

 

If you're not going to be honest there is little point debating with you.

 

We all know you've seen it. 

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

There you go again making assumptions, it’s something you often do.

 

I’ve not seen the video.

 

I have seen the Jury’s verdict.

 

 

Watch the video, makes for better debate, that's what the forum is for.

 

Refusing to watch it just shows weakness.