Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Anti-Corruption Group Challenges New PM Over Alleged Misconduct

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

da092fa6b61ff351bd103e1cf3a3bcb70562c4fe99994604f52f17a78cd519e6.jpeg

File photo for reference only

 

In a bold move on Monday, the Anti-Corruption People's Network, spearheaded by Akkarawat Pongthanachalitkul, brought a petition to the Thai Parliament, questioning the suitability of newly appointed Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul. This action arises amid swirling allegations of his connections to contentious land disputes and Senate vote-rigging.

 

The core of the group's concern revolves around Mr Anutin's alleged links to the Khao Kradong land controversy and claims of his involvement in manipulating the Senate selection process. With these serious accusations, the network aims to ensure that the current leadership can stand robust scrutiny resisting any ethical or legal challenges that could damage public trust.

 

Akkarawat presented the appeal to House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, urging a detailed investigation into Mr Anutin's competency. Moreover, this petition extends to scrutinising potential cabinet members and deputy ministers, amid fears that unresolved allegations could impact the nation's governance reputation both at home and abroad.

 

"We need the House Speaker to act diligently. Our country cannot afford any errors at such a crucial time," Akkarawat stressed, highlighting the vital necessity of transparent and credible leadership.

 

This move draws parallels to past cases such as former MP Pareena Kraikupt, who faced a lifetime ban from political office due to illegal land usage. Akkarawat underlined Mr Anutin's past as Bhumjaithai Party leader and the Senate election rigging allegations, cautioning against potential oversight that might weaken confidence in Thailand's political landscape.

 

In tandem with the petition, the main opposition, identified as the People's Party, is called upon by Akkarawat to exercise vigilance over the new prime minister. He challenges them to ensure rigorous scrutiny, prioritising national interests above all.

 

Mana Nimitmongkol, president of the Anti-Corruption Organisation of Thailand (ACT), echoed these anxieties in a social media post. He pointed out three critical areas of concern related to Mr Anutin’s tenure: the Senate vote-rigging claims and the Khao Kradong land issue, the appointment of ministers potentially linked to nefarious activities such as corruption and trafficking, and the prime minister’s perceived lack of active anti-corruption initiatives thus far.

 

Mana’s plea aligns with his broader "Reset Thailand" campaign, which he launched on National Anti-Corruption Day. The campaign advocates for comprehensive reform, urging national leaders to overhaul the civil service, empower independent watchdogs, and foster citizen participation aimed at preventing corrupt individuals from being elected.

 

As these issues take centre stage, Thailand finds itself at a pivotal juncture where the principles of integrity and transparency in governance are put to the test. The pressure mounts on Prime Minister Anutin and his administration to address these allegations decisively, ensuring their actions align with the nation's aspirations for clean and principled leadership.

 

The unfolding situation casts a significant spotlight on how Thailand's political system responds to allegations of this nature. It poses a fundamental question about the readiness and willingness of its institutions to uphold accountability and foster a climate where ethical governance is not just an aspiration but a lived reality.

 

As the story develops, all eyes remain on the Thai Parliament, the response of the People's Party, and the actions of Anutin himself. The forthcoming weeks could define not just the political fortunes of the new prime minister but also offer a decisive moment in Thailand's broader fight against corruption.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Bangkok Post 2025-09-09

 

image.jpeg

 

image.png

When you need a anti-corruption day, just about sums up Thailand & most people in Gov & local bods 

It's inbred & normal to them all

19 minutes ago, phil2407 said:

When you need a anti-corruption day, just about sums up Thailand & most people in Gov & local bods 

It's inbred & normal to them all

On Phitsanulok Road is the National Anti-Corruption Museum. But it closed down and its website is not functioning. Pity, I always wondered what exhibits they might have.

 

It also occurs to me to wonder what depths of depravity Anutin might be accused of in order to “impact the nation's governance reputation both at home and abroad.” I don't think the airstrip across allegedly appropriated state land (previouslly widely reported in Thai media) is in the right league; he must have done something seriously unpleasant to worsen the world's view of Thailand's political probity.

  • Popular Post

I live and work here since more than 20 years but that permanent change of alliances makes my head spin. Yesterday best friends, today enemies and tomorrow tolerated neighbors. Politicians changing views, options and parties like voters change their underwear. How will democracy develop when so many strings are pulled that it becomes a denim fabric.

Pheu Thai are going to try and put the People's Party between a rock and a hard place soon. They'll  file a no-confidence motion against Bhumjaithai accusing them of collusion in the Senate election, as well as focus on the Khao Kradong land issue.

They'll ask the People's Party where they stand on these issues. 

If PP back Bhumjaithai, they'll definitely lose public support, especially regarding collusion in the Senate election. 

If they agree with PT, where does that leave their contract with Bhumjaithai?

Finally, how will PP vote at the end of the debate? 

They'll have to abstain but PT will then accuse them of cowardice, ready to sacrifice ideals, ignore corruption simply to have a say about running politics ( though they're not even in government.

PP's clean image could soon be in tatters.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.