8 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

...

There are studies about MCD food as not being unhealthy.(researchgate.net)

...

 

Studies funded and/or conducted by McDonald's Hamburger University? 

3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

> https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Siri-Testimony-1.pdf

Thank you

2 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

So a Henry Ford spokesperson (NOT the authors/sponsor of the study) is now saying that the study does not meet scientific standards.  Normally the Institute would back its staff as the study was conducted by the Head Researcher of the Institute and overseen by the Doctor leading the department.  So the authors were correct in not wanting to publish the study as it would lead to ending their jobs/career, although they admitted that the study methodology and the results achieved were fact-based and valid. 

 

If Siri released the study - which by the way was sent to him by the researchers as that was the agreement made - without permission, Henry Ford Institute should sue him.  Of course they will not do so, as that would be Headline news and the study would gain enormous traction. 

But let's wait till October 3, when the movie based on this study, aptly named 'An Inconvenient Study' will be released.  

 

The study was awful.   I posted a screenshot of the data set on the first page of this topic.  read it. 

4 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Perhaps it is the quantity of the fast food being consumed and not the quality, along with high sugar content drinks.

Add in lack of exercise for the lard arses.

 

Banning DDT was a crime against humanity. Millions have died from malaria when the mosquitoes could have been controlled or eradicated.

Seem to remember that a study showed it may have caused a soft shell in an eagles egg and subsequently banned.

 

My mum use to put liquid DDT on insect bites in the 60's.

Good that you survived all "attacks " to your health 555

3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Studies funded and/or conducted by McDonald's Hamburger University? 

Those exist as well

5 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

The study was awful.   I posted a screenshot of the data set on the first page of this topic.  read it. 

 

Don't see what's wrong with the data-set that you posted.  Please explain. 

Here the link to the full-study > > https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf 

In Australia the diagnosis of Autism seems to be linked to the seemingly unlimited capacity of the National Disability Insurance Scheme funds available.

Bit like the old adage of junk expands to fill the available space.

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

This was the whole point of keeping the Pfizer Papers hidden for 70 years.

 

If it can be shown that there was fudging of data, and fraudulent results, their glass shield can be shattered.

The most important word in your reply is "IF". 5555

1 minute ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Don't see what's wrong with the data-set that you posted.  Please explain. 

Here the link to the full-study > > https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf 

I have the full study on my desktop already.   I posted a relevant screenshot capture on the first page of this topic.   Right from the start of the study they compared unhealthy kids to healthily kids.  It’s a garbage study. 

8 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Thank you

That's what I posted second post on this thread..

 

10 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

The most important word in your reply is "IF". 5555

If the whole unredacted/uncensored data set is released.

13 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

I have the full study on my desktop already.   I posted a relevant screenshot capture on the first page of this topic.   Right from the start of the study they compared unhealthy kids to healthily kids.  It’s a garbage study. 

 

You posted this excerpt from the study: 

I presume that the sentence 

> Characteristics more common in the exposed group were female sex, African American race, low-birthweight, prematurity, respiratory distress and trauma at birth.

triggered you to reject the study as 'garbage'. 

But in the chapter Limitations of the Study, the researchers mentioned: 

> We lacked information on socioeconomic status, or potentially relevant post birth factors, such as diet or lifestyle, but did adjust for several important baseline confounders such as gender, ethnicity, gestational age and birthweight. 

 

And having read the study I certainly do NOT agree that < your quote > the study compared unhealthy kids to healthily kids.  

 

 

35 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

The most important word in your reply is "IF". 5555

Ms Wolfe has found some 'dodgy' data. Less than half has been examined to date.

 

Go Kennedy go!

6 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Go Kennedy go!

Well, go to hell ......you want to say? 55555

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

I presume that the sentence 

> Characteristics more common in the exposed group were female sex, African American race, low-birthweight, prematurity, respiratory distress and trauma at birth.

triggered you to reject the study as 'garbage'. 

But in the chapter Limitations of the Study, the researchers mentioned: 

> We lacked information on socioeconomic status, or potentially relevant post birth factors, such as diet or lifestyle, but did adjust for several important baseline confounders such as gender, ethnicity, gestational age and birthweight. 

- You can’t attribute the outcomes to a vax due unless the studies controlled for other variables.  

13 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

- You can’t attribute the outcomes to a vax due unless the studies controlled for other variables.  

The study DID control for other variables.  

It was authored by the Head Researcher of the Henry Ford Institute and approved by the Head of its Pediatric division.  As mentioned already many times, they were at the outset of the study convinced that it would prove once and for all the benefits of vaccinating children.  But the health records spanning a period of 16 years (from birth to adolescence) kept at the Henry Ford Institute of +18.000 children, did show the exact opposite.  And they then realized that publishing the study would torpedo their careers and make them outcasts in the medical community.  But they did had the decency to provide the study to the vax-sceptic organization that had requested them to do such a study. 

The upcoming movie 'An Incovenient Study' featuring this case, will premiere 3 October. 

Note that RFK jr is well aware of the above, and hopefully it will mean the dead blow for the sordid child inoculation scheme, that has blown out of all proportions in the US (as a first step the Covid-19 jabs for all children have already been removed from the scheme). 

On 9/15/2025 at 3:06 PM, Red Phoenix said:

... 

Also note that we might have to wait till 3 October, when the movie about this case, called 'An Inconvenient Study' will be premiered.  

> https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/

The website already contains a teaser and a trailer of this explosive movie, and the site allows to provide your e-mail so that you will stay informed of any developments.    

 

 

 

 

 

Yep TODAY the movie ' An Inconvenient Study' premieres...

Source to watch clip > https://substack.com/@drwojakmd/note/c-154286223?r=127ihm

 

 

2 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

https://substack.com/@drwojakmd/note/c-154286223?r=127ihm

 

Anonymous quack alert!

 

And reposting false nonsense doesn't make it any less false the second or third times around:

 

Perhaps this is the reason the cited "document" that's the subject of this thread has never been published anywhere... Note the use of the term "Myths" in the news report below.

 

Rinse and repeat: US vaccine hearing on unpublished study debates same myths

The Guardian

Wed 10 Sep 2025

 

"Henry Ford Health’s communications office did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication, but later sent over the following statement via a spokesperson: “This report was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution. Data has consistently shown vaccinations are a safe and effective way to protect children against potentially life-altering diseases.”

...

Zervos and the other authors of the study were not present at the hearing. The study, which has never been peer-reviewed, is not currently available to the public as a pre-print or in any other form.

...

Jake Scott, a clinical associate professor of infectious diseases at Stanford – and the only physician who served as a witness during the hearing – had a different explanation as to why the study was not published.  In his testimony, Scott said that the study was “fundamentally flawed”, adding that its core problem was that “vaccinated children had twice the follow-up time and substantially more healthcare visits than unvaccinated children." [meaning the vaccinated group with more doctor visits was more likely to receive medical diagnoses, making the comparisons invalid]  [emphasis added]

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/vaccine-hearing-congress-illness-children

 

39 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Yep TODAY the movie ' An Inconvenient Study' premieres...

Source to watch clip > https://substack.com/@drwojakmd/note/c-154286223?r=127ihm

 

 

 

And the cited film is just another compilation of disgraced anti-vax figures like Peter McCullough, Del Bigtree and attorney Aaron Siri (depicted in the video clip image above) recycling their same old false anti-vaxer nonsense.

 

--AI assisted

 

Del Bigtree:

 

"Del Matthew Bigtree is an American television and film producer who is the CEO of the anti-vaccination group Informed Consent Action Network. He produced the film Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, based on the discredited^[4] opinions of Andrew Wakefield, and alleges an unsubstantiated connection between vaccines and autism. He served as communications director for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 2024 presidential campaign^[5][6] and subsequently took a leading role in two groups associated with Kennedy's political career.^[7]" [emphasis added]

...

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bigtree propagated conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus and COVID vaccines, and urged his audience to ignore the advice of health authorities.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_Bigtree

 

Peter McCullough:

 

ABIM Revokes Certification of Another Doctor Who Made Controversial COVID Claims

...

The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) revoked the board certification of Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, a cardiologist who promoted controversial views about COVID-19.

 

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/113624

 

https://www.abim.org/verify-physician?type=name&ln=McCullough&fn=Peter