2 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

I do not have anything agains prostitutes, I just laugh at the very many guys on this blog who seem to show off they have bought a young woman.

 

I would keep such an embarrassing thing secret.

 

Any one of us could do it, nothing to be proud of.

 

Don't the old blokes know when they walked down the street strutting like a winner with the young girl on their arm,  all the other people know they are losers.

 

 

All there choice, live and let live, good luck to them, obviously it's not for you, but then again, that's your choice, respect.

 

By the way, I'm single, in my 70's and if I fancy it, and it has a pulse, it's fair game, how much it costs is irrelevant.

3 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

Well in that case it is a mutual relationship, it may be the humour we find attractive, or shared interests, many things related to personality, sure we choose someone we get on with unless we are desperate.

 

Those are mutually beneficial feelings not financial transactions. 

 

That has nothing to do with old blokes buying young women who are with them purely and simply for money.

 

It would always be a "mutual" relationship, in the sense she wants something from you, and you want something from her. Otherwise there'd be no relationship.

 

Yes, it may be your humour, your jokes, that make her feel good, or she may enjoy you as an archery partner, she may like your considerate character, sure.

 

However, those are also transactions, you provide her with feel good feelings with your humour, your company in archery or make her feel good with your considerate character..

 

So you are giving her things she wants.

 

It has everything to do with an older guy paying a young woman. Just as the old man is paying money to the young woman, you are giving the woman other things she wants too. Again, it's a transactional relationship.

 

This is the nature of the beast. No man can be derided for paying for a woman, if all men do so.

45 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

Since the tourist zones are either bars or restaurants, working in a restaurant is a low paying job. 

Barely enough to support children unless there is a husband also working. Many of these girls are divorced.

 

But of course the girls are abusing the situation by having a bunch of different guys sending them money from abroad. 

 

 

 

Many of the women working in non sex jobs are divorced.

 

And what has the few tourist areas have to do with the vast parts of Thailand which do not have tourist areas, where do those women work.

 

Are you saying all divorced Thai women can only work in tourist areas as sex workers ?

 

Many farangs fall for that sort of nonsense all the time and end up with an empty wallet and bank account as far as some of the stories I have heard. 

 

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

It would always be a "mutual" relationship, in the sense she wants something from you, and you want something from her. Otherwise there'd be no relationship.

 

Yes, it may be your humour, your jokes, that make her feel good, or she may enjoy you as an archery partner, she may like your considerate character, sure.

 

However, those are also transactions, you provide her with feel good feelings with your humour, your company in archery or make her feel good with your considerate character..

 

So you are giving her things she wants.

 

It has everything to do with an older guy paying a young woman. Just as the old man is paying money to the young woman, you are giving the woman other things she wants too. Again, it's a transactional relationship.

 

This is the nature of the beast. No man can be derided for paying for a woman, if all men do so.

 

Yes the mutual things are shared in normal relationship between the man and the woman, they all shared equally. It is a two way thing. 

 

That has nothing to do with an old bloke paying for a young girl, the relationship is based on sex for the guy, the women pretending to like the old guy, it is very shallow.

 

Why don't the guys just hire one on a daily basis and cut out all of the other nonsense I wonder. 

 

Signing off now as I have some 'work' to do.

 

6 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

Yes the mutual things are shared in normal relationship between the man and the woman, they all shared equally. It is a two way thing. 

 

This is a different, but very important aspect, of relationship science, A healthy relationship is indeed a two way street, and both are getting what they want, with neither "overpaying". But that's merely an ideal. in the real world there will ALWAYS be one person that overpays, ie one person is the adorer, and one person pays less, that person is the adored.

 

It is extremely rare for both to be equally loved, usually one loves the other more. Often considerably more. And yes, that is where problems begin, if an older man were to love a young woman vastly more, than she likes him, then of course she has considerably leeway to exploit his attraction. It becomes a more clear disproportional exchange.

 

Howevever, all relationships are dispproportional to some degree. It is very rare to find these "equal" relationships. That is just an ideal.

 

Usually, i think it is not just about money, even with an older man and younger woman, the younger woman will generally ensure she also likes the man. Or the relationship will be very short-lived.

 

 

23 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

Any one of us could do it, nothing to be proud of.

You sound like you want to impress others, and not yourself?

14 hours ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

Are you saying all divorced Thai women can only work in tourist areas as sex workers ?

 

Many farangs fall for that sort of nonsense all the time and end up with an empty wallet and bank account as far as some of the stories I have heard. 

 

 

No, you're right. I guess they always have plenty of other options but they are looking for easy money. Or too lazy or stupid to try to get even a hairdressing certificate. 

 

Personally, I will not marry a sex worker as there are plenty of available women in non tourist areas. I don't see the point. Unless it happens by accident where they think they are just going for sex and then fall in love with these girls. 

 

 

On 10/18/2025 at 2:45 PM, MalcolmB said:

The various entertainment venues have varying skill sets each with the own sets of pros and cons.

Many of us expats and tourists get into long term relationships with these girls.

Which type of venue produces the best girls?

I don't think you get into long term relationships, you seem to just wander the girlie bars looking for someone that will entertain you, so you can leave out the "us", but you keep looking, one day it may happen........

On 10/18/2025 at 8:45 AM, emptypockets said:

Not such thing as chix with dix. They are men with fake tits.

Nothing wrong with showing off your hardness by displaying your prejudices, but you’d look harder talking to the blokes you’re talking about than talking to us.

11 hours ago, StreetCowboy said:

Nothing wrong with showing off your hardness by displaying your prejudices, but you’d look harder talking to the blokes you’re talking about than talking to us.

 

Speaking of fake tits, all the women who do breast implants are basically one step away from the ladyboys.

It's a fake body part, a surgical procedure. 

I'm not a huge fan of fake tits, but many guys don't mind or like it and it's been accepted in society for a long time.

So why should ladyboys be an issue? It's just surgical tweaking. 

 

26 minutes ago, StreetCowboy said:

Nothing wrong with showing off your hardness by displaying your prejudices, but you’d look harder talking to the blokes you’re talking about than talking to us.

I don't associate with ladyboys.

I don't have an issue if you wish to.