3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

 

Did you guys ever wonder why the Trump deranged shout "paedo" so much?  Interesting

 

 

We know why.

Let's see the Epstein Files.

If he's innocent, there is no reason he would object to their release.
But what's the latest count? He's mentioned 87 times?
Must be a misprint.

7 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

that was his response to the letter above from Jordan

Do you think he wont take the 5th if testifying?

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Paedo again. Wonder why Biden never released it.

 

Identify the Paedo protectors in the GOP, troll.

 

"Paedo again. Wonder why Biden never released it."

Maybe because of this?

 

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, FolkGuitar said:

Let's see the Epstein Files.

Whats in them? 

 

7 minutes ago, FolkGuitar said:

If he's innocent, there is no reason he would object to their release.

Why didnt Biden release them?

 

 

2 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

"Paedo again. Wonder why Biden never released it."

Maybe because of this?

 

Are you contenting that Trump has the power to release GJ testimony?

 

Why didnt Biden leak them.

 

Are you contending that if there was paedo information about Trump it wouldnt have found its way into the Press over the past 10 years.

 

You lose, again.

 

 

Trolling memes removed @BLMFem

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Are you contenting that Trump has the power to release GJ testimony?

 

Why didnt Biden leak them.

 

Ah, you're talking about President Biden. Why didn't President Biden do something illegal? Probably because he's not a criminal, like the convicted criminal you support. 

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Do you think he wont take the 5th if testifying?

I guess that would depend on whether he voluntarily appears with agreed terms or is issued a subpoena:

 

From the letter:

 

Please produce this material and contact the Committee to schedule your transcribed 
interview as soon as possible, but no later than 10:00 a.m. on October 28, 2025. Pursuant to the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized to conduct oversight of the Justice Department to inform potential legislative reforms.

 

 

 

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Are you contenting that Trump has the power to release GJ testimony?

 

Why didnt Biden leak them.

 

Are you contending that if there was paedo information about Trump it wouldnt have found its way into the Press over the past 10 years.

 

You lose, again.

 

 

3 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

Want to post a meme, at least make sure it's in English.

25 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

A good example of MAGAs' idea of evidence! 🤣

he's under subpoena already and must appear before congress on Oct 28 or face contempt of congress indictment. His bloviating and self serving comments , statements about testifying publicly are exactly that, "self serving"  and when the $hit hits the oscillatory rotor after the crossfire hurricane grand jury set to convene in January , of course jack Smith will take the opportunity to plead the 5th. Grand jury, rumored to convene in Jan 2026 will make Watergate look like a boy scout jamboree .  

20 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

statements about testifying publicly are exactly that, "self serving"

Please explain how a public testimony can be self serving.

2 hours ago, candide said:

A good example of MAGAs' idea of evidence! 🤣

Memes are only meaningful if socialists post them right?

There is a link above to the letter Jack Smith via attorneys received from Jim Jordan. This is what a House subpoena from Jordan would look like:

 

On 10/24/2025 at 4:13 PM, Yagoda said:

Put him up there under oath, call his bluff.

 

His lawyer wont let him but it gets the idiots excited.

"His lawyers won't let him"

I can't believe you posted something this dumb. What authority do they have to stop him?

19 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So you are saying, with a criminal case on the horizon, his defense lawyer will allow him to testify in a hearing, under oath, with no recourse to the 5th and no rules of evidence governing the questions they ask him?

 

I will let the American members of the Forum decide

More of the same nonsense.

3 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

"His lawyers won't let him"

I can't believe you posted something this dumb. What authority do they have to stop him?

Resign. No lawyer worth his salt is going to allow a criminal target to testify under oath in a non criminal proceeding. 

 

Let me repeat that: It would be legal malpractice to allow a criminal target to testify under oath in a non criminal proceeding.

 

You cant force your client to do anything. But you dont have to be a part of his idiocy.

15 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Resign. No lawyer worth his salt is going to allow a criminal target to testify under oath in a non criminal proceeding. 

 

Let me repeat that: It would be legal malpractice to allow a criminal target to testify under oath in a non criminal proceeding.

 

You cant force your client to do anything. But you dont have to be a part of his idiocy.

So, in other words you're conceding that his lawyers can't compell him.

6 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

So, in other words you're conceding that his lawyers can't compell him.

Huh? Are you daffy? How can a lawyer "compel" his client? Compell him to do what?

 

Stop watching TV dramas, 88

22 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Whats in them? 

 

Why didnt Biden release them?

 

 

T

 

The biden auto-pen team didn't release any Epstein files because it would have only BENEFITED Trump and exposed  a lengthy list of democrat pedophiles to the DETRIMENT of the liberal pedophile establishment. The auto-pen deep state losers would have jumped at the opportunity to tie Trump to Epstein, (they had 4 years to do so) as they have done so on numerous occasions only to fail because they are too stupid to differentiate between nothing-burgers and their daft propaganda schemes. 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Huh? Are you daffy? How can a lawyer "compel" his client? Compell him to do what?

 

Stop watching TV dramas, 88

You are the party who claimed that "his lawyers won't let him." 

It's clear you don't understand what "won't let him" means.

Multiple troll post removed.

 

@darbie-foos rule 9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the  forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

3 hours ago, darbie-foos said:

🤣T

 

The biden auto-pen team didn't release any Epstein files because it would have only BENEFITED Trump and exposed  a lengthy list of democrat pedophiles to the DETRIMENT of the liberal pedophile establishment. The auto-pen deep state losers would have jumped at the opportunity to tie Trump to Epstein, (they had 4 years to do so) as they have done so on numerous occasions only to fail because they are too stupid to differentiate between nothing-burgers and their daft propaganda schemes. 

Suuure! 

 

And now they want the Epstein files to be released, in order to expose the "lengthy list of democrat pedophiles to the DETRIMENT of the liberal pedophile establishment" that they did not want to expose before (according to you)! 🤣🤣🤣

 

You are completely incoherent!

 

 

30 minutes ago, candide said:

Suuure! 

 

And now they want the Epstein files to be released, in order to expose the "lengthy list of democrat pedophiles to the DETRIMENT of the liberal pedophile establishment" that they did not want to expose before (according to you)! 🤣🤣🤣

 

You are completely incoherent!

 

 

 

Incoherent? That's very polite!😉

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jack-smith-shifts-from-defense-to-counterattack-nyt/vi-AA1PNsI6?ocid=socialshare

 i dare you ...

I read that Bondi was going to release the Smith investigation report in order to expose the fake evidence used and  clear Trump's name!

 

Of course, I'm joking! 🤣

 

It's even less likely to be released than the Epstein files!