1 minute ago, Dan O said:

Never asked about any termination letter did I?  But you cant answer simple question when it doesn't agree with your twisted idiotic position to support your agenda. 

 

So either you support the actions outlined in the article or you dont. Its obvious you support it due to your lack of ability or refusal to answer.

 

So we have the answer in your non response, you agree its acceptable to punish people doing their jobs and being honest if it goes against trumps directives and policy position. 

 

Got it load and clear. 

 

 

Transslation: I live in my imaginary bubble where the facts are not allowed.

 

What did the termination letters say?

15 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Quite the screech there. Not to provoke another tantrum, have you seen the termination letter?

No screech,  just a fact that you've proven time and time again. See your own posts if you doubt it. You wrote them so there's  no dispute about the origin or what you wrote right ?

 

As for termination letters,  I never asked you about them. I asked you if you support the actions outlined in the article.  Your position is quite clear that you do based on your reluctance to answer a simple question. 

9 minutes ago, Airalee said:

So you’re saying he’s a big improvement over Biden.

 

Agreed.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/24/joe-bidens-approval-ratings/pp_2024-4-24_biden-trump_4-01/

 

Not according to Ballotopedia

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia's_Polling_Index:_Comparison_of_opinion_polling_during_the_Trump_and_Biden_administrations

 

But even if that was the case, what's your point? 

Jacking up the size of fonts is a bit like using all caps.  Moderate use for highlighting titles or for emphasis is OK, but the overuse is a bit like screaming.  Please refrain from overuse.  

49 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

There is no procedure for cancelling a presidential pardon other than for fraud, eic. (on behalf of the recipient not the President)

I agree - but there will be I think - once this matter goes to SCOTUS for their decision on what is a 'valid' Pardon that meets the Constitutional definition, and what processes must be done to ensure it is Valid.  The most obvious issue about the Biden's Pardons is that there is absolutely no clear auditable document trail to show that we was involved and agreed to the Pardons. I would not be surprised if the SCOTUS determines that all Pardons are only Valid if signed by the POTUS with a clear auditable trail and that the actual signature is witnessed by certain White House Staff.

 

Everything the POTUS does is recorded - there is no evidence Biden was actually directly involved with or agreed to any of those Pardons in huis last few days of Office - especially the blanket Pardons for all those involved in the BS Jan 6 Insurrection Kangaroo Court/Investigation.  

4 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

But even if that was the case, what's your point? 

 

Just correcting your misinformation.

Biden had a lower approval rating than Trump.   
 

Don’t worry.  Trump will grow on you.   yeah….he sucks….but you’ll come around.

 

 

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Transslation: I live in my imaginary bubble where the facts are not allowed.

I saw a video the other day from a long time supporter of Israel. He stated that he has been wasting his time for years trying to point out all the errors and lies and omissions of those fools who support Hamas and 'Palestine' in USA.  He stated very clearly and concisely that he was wasting his time because they dont care about facts - they are all about feelings and emotions.  He showed that they are all about inclusion and equity as a means of virtue signalling against an 'oppressor'. There was no logic or factual basis for the claims they made - and whenever questioned and shown the truth., they would just walk away.  This was especially true of his one-one interviews with students at USA Universities - they could never defend their logic because they did not have any - and they refused to accept that facts mattered - it was all about their emotions.

 

Same thing for the delusional people who hate Trump - they truly believe that anything they see or hear that supports their narrative, is true. There is no way to convince them otherwise - they will only change their views when they experience real life and/or change themselves. But when they do, and many do, very few of them will publicly state that they were wrong.  There are some - but they are rare - most of them just go quiet and stay away from politics.   

12 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

I agree - but there will be I think - once this matter goes to SCOTUS for their decision on what is a 'valid' Pardon that meets the Constitutional definition, and what processes must be done to ensure it is Valid.

The SCOTUS receives the opinion from whom on what is a valid pardon issued by the President which is a constitutional issue.

3 hours ago, connda said:

The Capitol Police opened some of the doors to the Capitol - and invited protestors in!  

Those who "violently forced their way into the Capitol" should be prosecuted.
Those who were invited in - by the Capitol police - to peaceful protest should be exonerated.

The prosecutors who lumped every single person at the Capitol that day as "rioters" who "violently forced their way into the Capitol" should themselves be sanctioned (that's not what happened) And now those prosecutors are being identified and their actions brought into question...as it should be.  And I'll take it one step further.  The current DOJ should look into the activities of the January 6th Committee and review for illegalities, i.e., the deliberate attempt to subvert US justice in order to target Trump supporters who peacefully assembled to petition the government for the redress of greivences.

You must be kidding! 🤣

 

Yes, some police officers opened doors to protesters to de-escalate because they thought they were not prepared to affront them.

 

But if these protesters were peaceful, why were they massed at the door instead of peacefully protesting outside? The building was clearly under siege and there was a lot of violence around. They could not have ignored that they were not authorized to enter the Capitol under such circumstances. On top of it while Congress was certifying election results! 🤣

2 hours ago, cooked said:

It wasn't a riot. Plenty of video footage shows police indulging in provocative actions to provoke one. Are you going to repeat Biden's lie, that 4 policemen were killed on that day? How about Pelosi refusing to let the national guard intervene, as requested by Trump himself? How about White House officials kindly inviting those guys to visit the White House and then prosecute them all for trespassing? How about AOC claiming that the "rioters" tried to get into her office while she was there, when she was miles away? Why haven't the pipe bomb guys been arrested, why did the FBI not react immediately when one was found near the Dems headquarters where Kamala was actually present? I won't go into the mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, refusal to render voting records, mysterious deliveries of trucks to voting places at 2am,  Rep. observers being blocked from ballot counting rooms?

You can probably find convoluted reasons to explain all of this, but it DOES seem a little strange, right? Too many lieds and fabrications.

 

A ridiculous post full of lies! 🤣

 

Welcome to the MAGA alternate universe! 🤣

30 minutes ago, Airalee said:

So…not as bad as Biden.   Agreed.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/economy-opinion-poll-2023-07-30/

Biden isn't part of this thread. You need to stay on topic or start your own thread about Biden 

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Biden isn't part of this thread. You need to stay on topic or start your own thread about Biden 

It’s understandable that you wouldn’t want Biden to be part of any thread about Trump when history shows he was so much worse.

 

And you need to calm down.

21 minutes ago, Airalee said:

 

Just correcting your misinformation.

Biden had a lower approval rating than Trump.   
 

Don’t worry.  Trump will grow on you.   yeah….he sucks….but you’ll come around.

 

 

 Do I hhave tocorrect your miscomprehension. The information I posted showed that Trump's rating was still slightly lower than Biden's at this point.

That said, even if you got it right what misinformation did I post? What did I post that was false?

44 minutes ago, Airalee said:

So you’re saying he’s a big improvement over Biden.

 

Agreed.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/24/joe-bidens-approval-ratings/pp_2024-4-24_biden-trump_4-01/

 

You sure?  🤣

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia's_Polling_Index:_Comparison_of_opinion_polling_during_the_Trump_and_Biden_administrations

1 minute ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Did I have to correct your miscomprehension. The information I posted showed that Trump's rating was still slightly lower than Biden's at this point.

That said, even if you got it right what misinformation did I post? What did I post that was false?

You’re getting closer.   I got it right.   You got it wrong.

 

People disapproved of Biden far more than Trump.   It just took them a while to realize it.

 

You’ll get there.   I have faith in you.

1 minute ago, candide said:

You sure?  🤣

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia's_Polling_Index:_Comparison_of_opinion_polling_during_the_Trump_and_Biden_administrations

Can you run that line for Biden out a few more years?   Thanks!

6 minutes ago, Airalee said:

It’s understandable that you wouldn’t want Biden to be part of any thread about Trump when history shows he was so much worse.

 

And you need to calm down.

I'm perfectly calm. You on the other hand are deflecting and gaslighting the thread with non related posts.

 

The thread is about lawyers being put on admin leave. You are trying to change the narrative to a different topic. 

 

Like I said start your own Biden thread and I'm sure you'll get lots of discussion. 

 

1 minute ago, Airalee said:

You’re getting closer.   I got it right.   You got it wrong.

 

People disapproved of Biden far more than Trump.   It just took them a while to realize it.

 

You’ll get there.   I have faith in you.

Now, 2 posts feature this graphic from Ballotopedia:

I can't believe that someone is so clueless that they can't understand this this simple graph. I'll give it a try: The top line is for Joe bodiens turm up to now: the second line (the darkest one) is for Trump's second term. The bottom line is for Trump's 1st term. What do you think it means that Biden's line is slightly above Trump's?

5 minutes ago, Airalee said:

You’ll get there.   I have faith in you.

What a kind soul, ass opposed to those who would have you stand before the ditch

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

The thread is about lawyers being put on admin leave. You are trying to change the narrative to a different topic. 

I didn’t change the topic.   The OP did.   And I replied to it.

 

Take a deep breath.  It will be ok.

2 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

What do you think it means that Biden's line is slightly above Trump's?

It means that people were bamboozled at the time which is why it absolutely tanked afterwards.

 

 

1 minute ago, Airalee said:

It means that people were bamboozled at the time which is why it absolutely tanked afterwards.

 

 

E

Even if your take on this is true, you can't know how Trump will fare in the future. And anyway, this is totally irrelevant to the issue of Trump's popularity. Or do you believe that claiming Biden's approval rating was even lower somehow proves that Trump is favorably viewed by most Americans?

6 minutes ago, Airalee said:

Can you run that line for Biden out a few more years?   Thanks!

Lame argument! Can you run Trump II line out a few more years? 🤣

 

Ratings tend to go down over time. It happened for Trump 1.0, it happened for Biden, and probably also for Obama 2.0 (I didn't check). That's why the opposition often wins back the House and/or Senate after the midterms.

 

It is meaningless to compare ratings at different times of mandates. 🙂

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Lame argument! Can you run Trump II line out a few more years? 🤣

 

Ratings tend to go down over time. It happened for Trump 1.0, it happened for Biden, and probably also for Obama 2.0 (I didn't check). That's why the opposition often wins back the House and/or Senate after the midterms.

 

It is meaningless to compare ratings at different times of mandates. 🙂

It seems to be a common predilection of Trump supporters to invoke the future either explicitly or implicitly as evidence. For the fact-allergic, invoking the future is their sad recourse.

What Trump's sycophants want to hide! Of course, they scrubbed the document!  🤣

"then-former President Donald Trump published on a social media platform the purported address of former President Barack Obama,” Taranto had re-posted Trump “and thereafter started livestreaming from his van” as he drove through Obama’s neighborhood."

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/30/politics/justice-edited-court-documents-trump-january-6

 

 

33 minutes ago, Airalee said:

I didn’t change the topic.   The OP did.   And I replied to it.

 

Take a deep breath.  It will be ok.

Actually he didn't he posted about trump polls. You went off topic with Biden polls. 

 

 

 

6 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

The Trump vversion is that they peacefully battered their way into the capitol building and lovingly assaulted police officers

A police officer did lovingly murder one of the protestors.

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

A police officer did lovingly murder one of the protestors.

As part of a mob, she was breaking through a window to where members of Congress were being protected by police officers.

Actually a glass panel in a door, I believe.

 

 

The violent insurrectionists got off easy. Only one was shot as they threatened the lives of law enforcement personnel and everyone inside the Capitol that day.

And MAGA are trying to paint it as a peaceful little protest. Scum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 hours ago, billd766 said:

For what? 

 

Telling the truth.

 

No wonder you are a Trump supporter.

 

Truth and facts mean nothing to Trump.

 

Ne simply makes up his own, and the gullible swallow it.

I'm not a trump supporter.
I support our Judicial system, the second responsibility of a Prosecutor is to be objective. They clearly failed at that.
Go look that word up if its too much for you