Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Tourist Clarifies Reasons For Denied Entry at Don Mueang

Featured Replies

On 12/10/2025 at 11:09 AM, Georgealbert said:

She added that the only information provided came later from airport security staff shortly before they were sent back to Vietnam.

 

Don Mueang Immigration sends her back to Vietnam. Then Suvarnabhumi Immigration welcomes her back shortly after... 😆

(Do the IOs get a commission for the extra flight bookings?)

  • Replies 81
  • Views 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • What form would she have been filling in that asks about the amount of cash she has?

  • IMHO, this is one of those times that "when you are in a hole, stop digging" applies.   Just try entering at another location with all the correct paperwork (such as it is) and don't post on

  • And they expect you to carry that income with you?  555

Posted Images

I have no idea what this is. She seems annoying and probably deserves the trouble she is getting

On 12/12/2025 at 5:08 PM, Jaggg88 said:

The requirement is 20k baht in cash. Not a credit card or bank balance. Some people say it can be 20k baht or cash equivalent, but in most cases the IO is using it as an excuse to deny entry because he/she do not feel they are a genuine tourist.

 

"The requirement is 20k baht in cash..."

 

Where have you officially read that, I have seen it quoted in blogs such as this but never anywhere officially.

 

I am not being argumentative but I would also like to check this officially as in my opinion it can not be a real cash rule as most tourist entering the country would not have Thai cash yet as most would get it from the ATM at BKK airport for example. 

 

In order for people to be turned away as an 'excuse' would mean there is a real rule in place. 

22 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

"The requirement is 20k baht in cash..."

 

Where have you officially read that, I have seen it quoted in blogs such as this but never anywhere officially.

 

I am not being argumentative but I would also like to check this officially as in my opinion it can not be a real cash rule as most tourist entering the country would not have Thai cash yet as most would get it from the ATM at BKK airport for example. 

 

In order for people to be turned away as an 'excuse' would mean there is a real rule in place. 

 

 

Wording on the LA website matches the Washington website.

 

https://washingtondc.thaiembassy.org/en/page/visaexempt-voajul2024

"Travelers entering Thailand under the Tourist Visa Exemption Scheme must possess adequate cash of or equivalent to 20,000 Baht per person or 40,000 Baht per family."

 

 

16 minutes ago, Oliver Holzerfilled said:

 

 

Wording on the LA website matches the Washington website.

 

https://washingtondc.thaiembassy.org/en/page/visaexempt-voajul2024

"Travelers entering Thailand under the Tourist Visa Exemption Scheme must possess adequate cash of or equivalent to 20,000 Baht per person or 40,000 Baht per family."

 

 

 

".....must possess adequate cash of or equivalent to ....

 

Very bad wording and grammar, it is American after all and not English-English, it can also mean equivalent to cash, eg money on a credit card, debit card or bank account.

 

But thanks for the link and info, I will try and cross reference it with other sources. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

".....must possess adequate cash of or equivalent to ....

 

Very bad wording and grammar, it is American after all and not English-English, it can also mean equivalent to cash, eg money on a credit card, debit card or bank account.

 

But thanks for the link and info, I will try and cross reference it with other sources. 

 

 

 

My interpretation is cash only.  I also found a link on a different official immigration website that explicitly said credit card was also acceptable.  I didn't include it because in was in reference to VOA, not VE.  Why there would be a difference between the requirements between VOA and VE as far as "cash" is concerned probably just comes down to the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing.

1 hour ago, Oliver Holzerfilled said:

 

 

Wording on the LA website matches the Washington website.

 

https://washingtondc.thaiembassy.org/en/page/visaexempt-voajul2024

"Travelers entering Thailand under the Tourist Visa Exemption Scheme must possess adequate cash of or equivalent to 20,000 Baht per person or 40,000 Baht per family."

 

 

 

More info after looking around :

 

Immigration law does not generally specify that proof of funds must be carried in cash. It typically requires that a visitor has sufficient means of subsistence. While some embassies state cash or traveller’s cheques as acceptable proof for visa or entry guidance purposes, this is not a requirement stated in immigration law itself. Recommendations to carry cash reflect practical risk-avoidance advice rather than a statutory obligation.

 

Hence other methods of proof such as a banking app will in all practical circumstances should be accepted.

 

 

 

 

 

On 12/10/2025 at 3:32 PM, Crossy said:

Isn't "insufficient funds" the default reason for rejection if the immigration officer doesn't like the look of you? Otherwise they never bother asking.

 

Maybe she just didn't look the part or failing to complete a TDAC before she arrived (I'm assuming that's the form she's talking about) pushed some buttons.

 

I will say she doesn't look the type that would just be rejected but ...

"they had previously spent significant time in the country."

 

That's the reason.

1 hour ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

"The requirement is 20k baht in cash..."

 

Where have you officially read that, I have seen it quoted in blogs such as this but never anywhere officially.

 

I am not being argumentative but I would also like to check this officially as in my opinion it can not be a real cash rule as most tourist entering the country would not have Thai cash yet as most would get it from the ATM at BKK airport for example. 

 

In order for people to be turned away as an 'excuse' would mean there is a real rule in place. 

 

There are no ATM machines air-side at any international airport in Thailand.

 

The requirement is 20,000 baht cash or the equivalent in foreign currency.

15 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

There are no ATM machines air-side at any international airport in Thailand.

 

The requirement is 20,000 baht cash or the equivalent in foreign currency.

 

I will repeat my previous comment.

 

More info after looking around :

 

Immigration law does not generally specify that proof of funds must be carried in cash. It typically requires that a visitor has sufficient means of subsistence. While some embassies state cash or traveller’s cheques as acceptable proof for visa or entry guidance purposes, this is not a requirement stated in immigration law itself. Recommendations to carry cash reflect practical risk-avoidance advice rather than a statutory obligation.

 

Hence other methods of proof such as a banking app will in all practical circumstances should be accepted.

--------------

If you can point directly to which immigration law supports your comment we can go with that, referring to general non -law comments is not proof of any kind and is just an assumption. 

 

 

23 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

I will repeat my previous comment.

 

More info after looking around :

 

Immigration law does not generally specify that proof of funds must be carried in cash. It typically requires that a visitor has sufficient means of subsistence. While some embassies state cash or traveller’s cheques as acceptable proof for visa or entry guidance purposes, this is not a requirement stated in immigration law itself. Recommendations to carry cash reflect practical risk-avoidance advice rather than a statutory obligation.

 

Hence other methods of proof such as a banking app will in all practical circumstances should be accepted.

--------------

If you can point directly to which immigration law supports your comment we can go with that, referring to general non -law comments is not proof of any kind and is just an assumption. 

 

 

This post shows a link to Immigration Thailand Instagram reel:

spokeperson clearly states B20K cash

 

 

27 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

I will repeat my previous comment.

 

More info after looking around :

 

Immigration law does not generally specify that proof of funds must be carried in cash. It typically requires that a visitor has sufficient means of subsistence. While some embassies state cash or traveller’s cheques as acceptable proof for visa or entry guidance purposes, this is not a requirement stated in immigration law itself. Recommendations to carry cash reflect practical risk-avoidance advice rather than a statutory obligation.

 

Hence other methods of proof such as a banking app will in all practical circumstances should be accepted.

--------------

If you can point directly to which immigration law supports your comment we can go with that, referring to general non -law comments is not proof of any kind and is just an assumption. 

 

 

 

Many threads on the forum over the years where it's claimed that immigration officers didn't ask to see any proof of funds before denying entry, plus a few threads where it was claimed immigration officers refused to look at any evidence of funds being offered, be it cash or otherwise, before denying entry.

 

Note this is not recent and not related to the most recent rule change that's causing so much grief. This was common during their last campaign against border-runners/hoppers which was pre-Covid.

------------

With regard to what will be accepted "in all practical circumstances" - what Thai immigration laws and or rules specify (or otherwise) and what any given immigration officer requests (or otherwise) on any given day at any given airport aren't the same. Never has been and never will be either.

10 minutes ago, vinny41 said:

This post shows a link to Immigration Thailand Instagram reel:

spokeperson clearly states B20K cash

 

 

 

I see no info in your post which states a law where there is a reference to 20k and cash?

 

I see a claim to a video.

 

13 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Many threads on the forum over the years where it's claimed that immigration officers didn't ask to see any proof of funds before denying entry, plus a few threads where it was claimed immigration officers refused to look at any evidence of funds being offered, be it cash or otherwise, before denying entry.

 

Note this is not recent and not related to the most recent rule change that's causing so much grief. This was common during their last campaign against border-runners/hoppers which was pre-Covid.

------------

With regard to what will be accepted "in all practical circumstances" - what Thai immigration laws and or rules specify (or otherwise) and what any given immigration officer requests (or otherwise) on any given day at any given airport aren't the same. Never has been and never will be either.

 

We have no basis to state there is a 20k law.

 

Just gossip on blogs like this.

 

Have you or anyone else you know ever been asked to produce 20k baht in cash, I do not. 

 

Can you point to the law which states 20k in cash is needed, nobody can as there is not such a law.

 

I do not accept the word of professional bloggers like the one in this article. 

4 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

I see no info in your post which states a law where there is a reference to 20k and cash?

 

I see a claim to a video.

 

 

I can claim I saw the  Loch Ness Monster and therefore it is true?

35 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

I see no info in your post which states a law where there is a reference to 20k and cash?

 

I see a claim to a video.

 

Section 14. The Minister shall have power to publish in the Government Gazette requiring the aliens entering the Kingdom to have with them either money or bond, or shall have power to make exemption under any conditions.

 IMMIGRATION ACT, BE 2522 (1979)

https://royalthaipolice.go.th/downloads/laws/laws_03_03-03.pdf

12 minutes ago, vinny41 said:

Section 14. The Minister shall have power to publish in the Government Gazette requiring the aliens entering the Kingdom to have with them either money or bond, or shall have power to make exemption under any conditions.

 IMMIGRATION ACT, BE 2522 (1979)

https://royalthaipolice.go.th/downloads/laws/laws_03_03-03.pdf

 

Money or bond. So not just money and I suspect 'bond' in todays world means other proof of funds eg credit card etc, plus the document refers to 1979 and I suspect it was replaced many times over the years but even in 1979 cash was not the only means of proving we had sufficient funds. 

 

So there is no where yet we have found a law where it is stated 20k in cash as it does not seem to exist. 

10 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

Money or bond. So not just money and I suspect 'bond' in todays world means other proof of funds eg credit card etc, plus the document refers to 1979 and I suspect it was replaced many times over the years but even in 1979 cash was not the only means of proving we had sufficient funds. 

 

So there is no where yet we have found a law where it is stated 20k in cash as it does not seem to exist. 

The IMMIGRATION ACT, BE 2522 (1979) is the latest law there may have been amendments or revisions  to this law 

The  Minister of Interior can make revisions to the above law and there have been many published in the Royal Gazette

Bond I suspect means investment bond of state owned bond remember Section 14 applies to all arrivals not just Visa Exempt

4 hours ago, vinny41 said:

The IMMIGRATION ACT, BE 2522 (1979) is the latest law there may have been amendments or revisions  to this law 

The  Minister of Interior can make revisions to the above law and there have been many published in the Royal Gazette

Bond I suspect means investment bond of state owned bond remember Section 14 applies to all arrivals not just Visa Exempt

Like most legislation, the Immigration Act itself sets out a framework that can't be contradicted but allows some degree of interpretation by the people who administer it - the Ministry of the Interior and Immigration Bureau in this case. I couldn't find the specific Ministerial Regulation that specifies 20,000 Baht was decided upon as satisfying Section 12(2) (or other parts of the Act) that deal with proof of funds, but there are various official references to it, such as:

 

https://london.thaiembassy.org/en/publicservice/84256-tourist-visa?page=5d6636cd15e39c3bd00072dd&menu=5f4b6eb3f6ae4b236972c562

 

And

 

https://www.mfa.go.th/en/publicservice/5d5bcc2615e39c306000a316

 

That said, booting someone out using S12(2) is more likely a pretext used when the IO simply decides that you've been in Thailand too long and are no longer a tourist. It's open to interpretation, and that's the way they like it.

Why argue about the finer points of Thai immigration law when the law is routinely not followed by immigration officers? 🤔

21 hours ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

 

We have no basis to state there is a 20k law.

 

Just gossip on blogs like this.

 

Have you or anyone else you know ever been asked to produce 20k baht in cash, I do not. 

 

Can you point to the law which states 20k in cash is needed, nobody can as there is not such a law.

 

I do not accept the word of professional bloggers like the one in this article. 

 

I take the word of immigration officers who have actively used this ethereal 20 k baht rule, not a law, to enforce denial of entry for over a decade already. This has been reported by many forum members, both directly and anecdotally. Just because it hasn't happened to me or anyone I know is hugely irrelevant. It has happened and it will happen again.

 

I have double emphasised the bit that has you bamboozled. There are rules that immigration officers arbitrarily use to enforce the law.

 

Anyway, you keep banging on about the law. Look out the window. You're in Thailand FFS. Even the police admit they're hopeless.

21 hours ago, NanLaew said:

 

I take the word of immigration officers who have actively used this ethereal 20 k baht rule, not a law, to enforce denial of entry for over a decade already. This has been reported by many forum members, both directly and anecdotally. Just because it hasn't happened to me or anyone I know is hugely irrelevant. It has happened and it will happen again.

 

I have double emphasised the bit that has you bamboozled. There are rules that immigration officers arbitrarily use to enforce the law.

 

Anyway, you keep banging on about the law. Look out the window. You're in Thailand FFS. Even the police admit they're hopeless.

 

"This has been reported by many forum members, both directly and anecdotally. Just because it hasn't happened to me or anyone I know is hugely irrelevant. It has happened and it will happen again."

 

Therefore according to your logic regarding the reports you have read, they are also hugely irrelevant, but I suppose that  simple logic is too hard for you to realise.

 

"Anyway, you keep banging on about the law. Look out the window. You're in Thailand FFS. Even the police admit they're hopeless."

 

So in that case according to your logic, you should also look out of the window regarding the rules you keep on banging on about. 

 

It is lucky for us you are not involved in rules or laws as you are less logical than anyone else in Thailand it seems by what you have written.🤣

 

 

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.