January 14Jan 14 The Clinton's won't come to Testify before Congress,they refused to answer a subpoena, so it looks like they might be potentially facing a civil or criminal charge."Former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will not comply with House subpoenas to testify about Jeffrey Epstein, they wrote in a letter to the House Oversight Committee".Google ai overview:"Yes, former President Bill Clinton could potentially face civil or criminal charges for refusing a congressional subpoena, but he is not facing any final charges yet. The process of bringing charges is ongoing and politically complex". The story is about a Forbes report & google ai overview
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post It would have been smarter from Clinton to claim that he will testify only if Trump also testifies! 🙂
January 14Jan 14 Author Congresswoman Bobbert Brought Bill Clinton's famous pic. in a dress.Google Ai overview:Yes, Rep. Lauren Boebert brought a physical copy of a painting to a House Oversight Committee gathering on January 13, 2026. The item she held up was a print of Australian artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid's painting titled "Parsing Bill", which reportedly hung in one of deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's properties. https://news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/artist-epstein-clinton-painting-1628953
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post Disclosure is a two way street.Going after the Clintons in court would inevitably result in the Clinton’s going after the Epstein Files in disclosure.The administration needs to quit with the theater, obey the law and release the Epstein files and not, as the law requires, redact names on the basis of embarrassing anyone or for political reasons.
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post 53 minutes ago, riclag said:Congresswoman Bobbert Brought Bill Clinton's famous pic. in a dress.Google Ai overview:Yes, Rep. Lauren Boebert brought a physical copy of a painting to a House Oversight Committee gathering on January 13, 2026. The item she held up was a print of Australian artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid's painting titled "Parsing Bill", which reportedly hung in one of deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's properties. https://news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/artist-epstein-clinton-painting-1628953Debunked long time ago It was her Diploma work and she did other caricatural paintings on other politicians.But what can you expect from a poster who still believes that the 2020 election has been rigged by massive fraud? 🤣
January 14Jan 14 Clinton reacting as Trump did! That's bad! 🤣https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-failed-comply-with-jan-6-committee-subpoena-panel-says-2022-11-14/
January 14Jan 14 Author Popular Post Clintons are in deep trouble!Rep Comer:He said the committee will meet next week to hold former US president Bill Clinton in contempt, which could potentially lead to criminal charges. The Clintons said this was "literally designed to result in our imprisonment"Sky NewsClintons refuse to testify in Republican-led Epstein inve...Republican representative James Comer said the committee leading the probe will meet next week to hold former US president Bill Clinton in contempt.
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post A stupid attempt to distract that will backfire. Clinton is not the one who is accused of wrongdoing and nothing in the files indicates any impropriety.
January 14Jan 14 Author If I don't answer your reply it means I get a notification ..."You've chosen to ignore content by blank.Options"11 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:A stupid attempt to distract that will backfire. Clinton is not the one who is accused of wrongdoing and nothing in the files indicates any impropriety.They better comply with a subpoena!
January 14Jan 14 Author Should the Clinton's go to jail?Google ai overview"If you don't comply with a congressional subpoena, Congress can pursue criminal contempt, referring you to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for prosecution, leading to potential fines or jail time; civil enforcement, suing you in federal court to compel compliance; or, rarely, inherent contempt, having you arrested and detained until you comply. The most common path is referral for criminal prosecution under federal law, making willful non-compliance a misdemeanor".
January 14Jan 14 Author Burchett nails it the Clinton's think they're above the law.BREAKING NEWS: Burchett Rips Bill And Hillary Clinton For 'Corrupt Nature' As They Refuse To Testify
January 14Jan 14 Well well well. Will the Clintons get banged up like Bannon and Navarro, or is the "conspiracy theory" that lefty scumbags are above the law about to be shredded like pork on a Texas BBQ?EVERY. SINGLE. NARRATIVE. Busted!!! 🤣
January 14Jan 14 Jack Smith was very open to a meeting open to the public with a committee. He had all the evidence. So why did they hold a closed door meeting?The Clintons don't need to appear before a biased committee.
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post She did not give blowjobs. So he had to look elsewhere. Girls take note: if you don't want your man getting into trouble, give him blowjobs.....
January 14Jan 14 Author 5 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:Well well well. Will the Clintons get banged up like Bannon and Navarro, or is the "conspiracy theory" that lefty scumbags are above the law about to be shredded like pork on a Texas BBQ?EVERY. SINGLE. NARRATIVE. Busted!!! 🤣Hillary is suppose to come today!Google ai overview:"Hillary Clinton was scheduled to give a closed-door deposition to the House Oversight Committee today, January 14, 2026, but she and her husband, Bill Clinton, have refused to comply with the subpoenas".
January 14Jan 14 6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:Disclosure is a two way street.Going after the Clintons in court would inevitably result in the Clinton’s going after the Epstein Files in disclosure.The administration needs to quit with the theater, obey the law and release the Epstein files and not, as the law requires, redact names on the basis of embarrassing anyone or for political reasons.Thats fine, let it all hang out.
January 14Jan 14 Author Hillary didn't show up!Hillary, Bill Clinton stare down criminal contempt charges after defying House subpoenas in Epstein probehttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-hillary-clinton-risk-criminal-contempt-charges-after-defying-house-subpoenas-epstein-probe
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post 7 minutes ago, riclag said:Hillary didn't show up!Hillary, Bill Clinton stare down criminal contempt charges after defying House subpoenas in Epstein probehttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-hillary-clinton-risk-criminal-contempt-charges-after-defying-house-subpoenas-epstein-probeAbove the law. Another sacred democrat narrative is BUSTED
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post 22 minutes ago, JimCM said:Evil woman.Nonce president.Bigger body count than Bundy, Gein & Ridgway combined. Lock her up
January 14Jan 14 Author Popular Post Looks like Bill & Hillary's fate is in the hands of the GOP.“We’re going to hold both Clintons in criminal contempt of Congress,” Comer told reporters Wednesday morning.The Oversight Committee will vote on both contempt measures next Wednesday and then go bring them to the House floor," he said.The committee had negotiated in good faith with the Clintons' attorneys for five months, Comer said".https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-plan-hold-hillary-clinton-contempt-refusing-testify-rcna253920
January 14Jan 14 1 hour ago, riclag said:Looks like Bill & Hillary's fate is in the hands of the GOP.“We’re going to hold both Clintons in criminal contempt of Congress,” Comer told reporters Wednesday morning.The Oversight Committee will vote on both contempt measures next Wednesday and then go bring them to the House floor," he said.The committee had negotiated in good faith with the Clintons' attorneys for five months, Comer said".https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-plan-hold-hillary-clinton-contempt-refusing-testify-rcna253920That would be so funny if they go to jail.Don't forget baby Bush for his fake WMD war.
January 14Jan 14 Author 1 minute ago, JimCM said:That would be so funny if they go to jail.Don't forget baby Bush for his fake WMD war.The story is and solely about the topic,Clinton's refuse to come to Testify before Congress, News
January 14Jan 14 If only the government followed the law, which ordered the Epstein files released by December 19. They are in contempt of the law and people wonder what they are hiding about Trump all this time.
January 14Jan 14 Author Next stop passing it through committee and then through the GOP majority House.
January 14Jan 14 2 hours ago, riclag said:The story is and solely about the topic,Clinton's refuse to come to Testify before Congress, NewsPlease only blame the Clinton's do not mention the hypocrisy of certain members ( Jim Jordan for one) refusal to testify even though they were called I've spoken to the president many times ah ah ah can't remember when
January 14Jan 14 13 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:Disclosure is a two way street.Going after the Clintons in court would inevitably result in the Clinton’s going after the Epstein Files in disclosure.The administration needs to quit with the theater, obey the law and release the Epstein files and not, as the law requires, redact names on the basis of embarrassing anyone or for political reasons.If they released the Epstein files without redacting, the entire political system would collapse, not only in the USA, but in many other countries. Best solution for those involved would be to have a dual citizenship, USA/Israel.
January 14Jan 14 8 hours ago, CHdiver said:She did not give blowjobs. So he had to look elsewhere. Girls take note: if you don't want your man getting into trouble, give him blowjobs.....I think she prefers the lick treat from the same sex.
January 14Jan 14 Popular Post via AI Gemini:The Clintons' Legal ChallengesIn a formal letter to the committee, the Clintons’ legal team outlined several specific grounds for their challenge:Lack of "Valid Legislative Purpose": They argue the subpoenas are "untethered" to any actual law-making function of Congress. Under Supreme Court precedents like Trump v. Mazars, Congress must prove a subpoena is reasonably necessary to support a legitimate legislative objective.
Create an account or sign in to comment