January 15Jan 15 8 hours ago, riclag said:The story is and solely about the topic,Clinton's refuse to come to Testify before Congress, NewsIt’s a distraction…..release the files just as the Clintons requested.
January 15Jan 15 Author 5 hours ago, GoodieAfterDark said:I think she prefers the lick treat from the same sex.I don’t know about her desires. Seems to me she tolerated Bill’s . 3 hours ago, suspectdevice said:Why put them on the stand? They would only lie through their teeth!I know ha
January 16Jan 16 On 1/14/2026 at 10:23 PM, Purdey said:They are in contempt of the law and people wonder what they are hiding about Trump all this time.Only the Trump deranged wonder.
January 22Jan 22 Author Take a Bow Mr. Comer, Clintons criminal contempt for avoiding a Congressional Subpoena has advanced to a Vote on the house floor.Oversight chair says Clintons’ testimony is critical to understanding Epstein network
January 23Jan 23 Author Don't let them escape justice Mr. Comer.BREAKING: Comer Shows Photos Of Clinton From Epstein Files In Call For Contempt Of Congress Charge
January 23Jan 23 Popular Post It is really very simple, and actually quite clever.The house committee wish to question the Clintons about matters which are in the Epstein files.If they refuse, then they face criminal charges.Criminal charges will take the matter from Comer's committee to the courts. The Epstein files will then become evidence, and have to be publicly disclosed, before the courts. If they refuse to make the evidence (the Epstein Files) public then any court case will collapse.
January 23Jan 23 33 minutes ago, JAG said:It is really very simple, and actually quite clever.The house committee wish to question the Clintons about matters which are in the Epstein files.If they refuse, then they face criminal charges.Criminal charges will take the matter from Comer's committee to the courts. The Epstein files will then become evidence, and have to be publicly disclosed, before the courts. If they refuse to make the evidence (the Epstein Files) public then any court case will collapse.Yep, it's gonna backfire like a <deleted>. 😆
January 23Jan 23 Inevitably, the charges of contempt will never be laid.He (Trump) really does hire the best people doesn't he?
January 23Jan 23 "Clinton's refuse to come to Testify before Congress, News" A new meaning for "talking trash".
January 23Jan 23 28 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:"Clinton's refuse to come to Testify before Congress, News"A new meaning for "talking trash".Please explain the above!
January 23Jan 23 17 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:Please explain the above!"Clinton's refuse" means refuse (trash) that belongs to Clinton. The apostrophe in "Clinton's" makes it possessive, not plural, and also makes the next word a noun, not a verb. Basically the sentence then means that Clinton's trash will testify, not that the Clintons won't testify.
January 23Jan 23 1 hour ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:"Clinton's refuse" means refuse (trash) that belongs to Clinton. The apostrophe in "Clinton's" makes it possessive, not plural, and also makes the next word a noun, not a verb. Basically the sentence then means that Clinton's trash will testify, not that the Clintons won't testify.I wish I had not asked as I still have no idea what you are saying! What does the word "trash" mean in the above gibberish?
January 23Jan 23 12 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:I wish I had not asked as I still have no idea what you are saying!What does the word "trash" mean in the above gibberish?
January 23Jan 23 1 hour ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:Basically the sentence then means that Clinton's trash will testify, not that the Clintons won't testify.I think that what you meant to say was that Clinton's testimony would be\include trash!
January 23Jan 23 23 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:I wish I had not asked as I still have no idea what you are saying!What does the word "trash" mean in the above gibberish?Refuse as a noun means trash.Refusal as a noun means noncompliance.Correct phrases for the headline would be either "Clintons refuse" or "Clintons' refusal".Let's not get started on where the apostrophe should be placed.
January 23Jan 23 6 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:I think that what you meant to say was that Clinton's testimony would be\include trash!Those who are not native English speakers get a pass. Otherwise, here's a link to a book sold on Amazon entitled "Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation". It discusses in a humorous way how punctuation is important and how simple mistakes can completely change the meaning of a sentence. A good example of this is the title of this thread.https://www.amazon.com/Eats-Shoots-Leaves-Tolerance-Punctuation/dp/1592402038I know that something like punctuation is a difficult subject for MAGAs, but this book treats it in a lighthearted way and may be of help. Probably a good place to start one's basic education before jumping into more complex issues like politics.
January 23Jan 23 10 hours ago, JAG said:Inevitably, the charges of contempt will never be laid.The DoJ would first have to obtain grand jury indictment(s):(Peter) Navarro sought to overturn the 2020 presidential election and in February 2022 was subpoenaed twice by Congress. Navarro refused to comply and was referred to the Justice Department. In 2022, a grand jury indicted him on two counts of contempt of Congress. In 2023, Navarro was convicted on both counts, and in 2024, he was sentenced to four months in jail, becoming the first former White House official imprisoned on a contempt-of-Congress conviction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Navarro
January 24Jan 24 5 hours ago, JerryM said:The DoJ would first have to obtain grand jury indictment(s):(Peter) Navarro sought to overturn the 2020 presidential election and in February 2022 was subpoenaed twice by Congress. Navarro refused to comply and was referred to the Justice Department. In 2022, a grand jury indicted him on two counts of contempt of Congress. In 2023, Navarro was convicted on both counts, and in 2024, he was sentenced to four months in jail, becoming the first former White House official imprisoned on a contempt-of-Congress conviction.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_NavarroYes, but in this case the DOJ will probably realise that proceedings in court will almost inevitably involve making public things in the Epstein files which they are doing their damndest to make sure do not get made public!That's why I don't think that they will proceed.
January 24Jan 24 Author Clinton gets a BJ in the Oval Office, gets impeached for perjury and obstruction, and now pictures come forward of him getting a relaxing massage... oh the selective outrage when a stained dress sparked a national crisis, but a grinning neck rub from an Epstein accuser is overlooked.
January 24Jan 24 The Clinton's are TeflonTM. They are untouchable. Hillary just flips the DOJ the bird while Bill turns around, drops his draws, and "moons" Pam Bondi and Congress. And nothing will happen.
January 24Jan 24 Author 5 minutes ago, connda said:The Clinton's are TeflonTM. They are untouchable.The Clinton's, Ignoring a congressional subpoena
January 24Jan 24 If, in fact, the House approves a contempt resolution against both Clintons and refers it to DoJ, at least when Peter Navarro was in the same position, he sought a (civil) declamatory judgment from the DC Court that the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th attack was "unlawful".Navarro was indicted by the grand jury a few days after his motion was denied.The Comer resolution for contempt repeatedly, among others reasons, cited the legislative purpose of the hearing would be to investigate "ways in which Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell sought to curry favor and exercise influence to protect their illegal activities."
January 24Jan 24 Author If I don't answer you the first time its because I get a notification,"You've chosen to ignore content by ..... ,"message.
January 24Jan 24 6 minutes ago, riclag said:If I don't answer you the first time its because I get a notification,"You've chosen to ignore content by ..... ,"message.Dear riclag,I'm certain that I speak for a large number of posters when I say, "We know, and we really don't care".😆
January 24Jan 24 On 1/14/2026 at 1:18 PM, riclag said:The story is about a Forbes report & google ai overviewAnd their was I thinking it was about a deflection from Trump in the Epstein files.
January 24Jan 24 Popular Post On 1/14/2026 at 7:07 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:Well well well. Will the Clintons get banged up like Bannon and Navarro, or is the "conspiracy theory" that lefty scumbags are above the law about to be shredded like pork on a Texas BBQ?EVERY. SINGLE. NARRATIVE. Busted!!! 🤣I really do not care who is who or whom did what!Convict and jail everyone involved in crimes like this.Sunnyboy,will this get trump banged up?
January 24Jan 24 Popular Post 3 hours ago, riclag said:The Clinton's, Ignoring a congressional subpoenaLots of people do that.
January 24Jan 24 Popular Post 3 hours ago, connda said:The Clinton's are TeflonTM. They are untouchable. Hillary just flips the DOJ the bird while Bill turns around, drops his draws, and "moons" Pam Bondi and Congress. And nothing will happen.Two competent lawyers vs. the Trump mob.
January 24Jan 24 Author 14 minutes ago, Dcheech said:Lots of people do that.The topic is. Clinton's refuse to come to Testify before Congress, NewsStaying on topic here,I'm putting deflectors on ignore so I won't see further off topic replies.
Create an account or sign in to comment