In a dramatic confrontation, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has fiercely criticized Donald Trump for his "insulting and frankly appalling" comments regarding British troops' involvement in Afghanistan. The former US President's unfounded claims that British and NATO soldiers avoided frontlines have ignited a firestorm of outrage among veterans and grieving families alike.

The diplomatic spat escalates already tense relations with the US, following Trump's derogatory remarks earlier about the UK's decision to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. Starmer's sharp response underscores the deepening fault lines between the two nations, fueled by Trump's assertion that British troops lacked gratitude for US support, a claim seen by many as an affront to the heroic sacrifices made by soldiers.

Starmer, speaking passionately, paid tribute to the 457 British service members who lost their lives in Afghanistan, describing their sacrifices as noble and worthy of the highest respect. His remarks highlight the sacrifices and injuries suffered by those on the frontlines, directly countering Trump's controversial claims.

The Prime Minister emphasized the significance of the UK's "very close" alliance with the United States, despite the contentious comments. "Canada doesn’t live because of the United States. Canada thrives because we are Canadian. We are masters of our home," he stated, aiming to affirm the nation's independent strength and reiterating solidarity with American allies.

Opposition figures from across the political spectrum were quick to denounce Trump's remarks. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch labeled Trump’s statements as "flat-out nonsense," while Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, strongly sided with Starmer, calling Trump's views "wrong" and highlighting the bravery of British soldiers who served alongside American forces for two decades.

Notably, the Liberal Democrats have called on Starmer to summon the US ambassador to address this affront to British troops, with leader Ed Davey condemning Trump's avoidance of military service during Vietnam and demanding a retraction of his offensive comments. "How dare he question their sacrifice," Davey exclaimed, urging others to stop idolizing Trump’s rhetoric.

Defense Secretary John Healey further reinforced the narrative of camaraderie and sacrifice, reminding the public of the shared values that led to fighting side by side with US troops. “These heroes must be remembered for who they were: individuals willing to sacrifice everything for our nation," he declared, saluting their courage and dedication.

Adding a personal touch, Prince Harry stepped into the fray with poignant reflections on his own tours in Afghanistan. Emphasizing the life-altering impact of the war, he urged that the sacrifices of soldiers "deserve to be spoken about truthfully and with respect." His comments resonated deeply, spotlighting the emotional scars carried by those who served.

As tensions simmer, the lack of direct communication between Downing Street and Trump underscores the ongoing diplomatic dance. Yet, the implications of his divisive remarks continue to reverberate, calling into question the integrity of military alliances and the treatment of veterans.

Key Takeaways:

• Starmer takes a stand against Trump’s "appalling" troop comments, demanding respect and recognition for soldiers.

• A wave of bipartisan outrage against Trump's claims underscores solidarity and respect for military sacrifices.

• Prince Harry offers a heartfelt reminder of the deep sacrifices made by troops, urging for truth and honor in their remembrance.

  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from source 2026-01-23

 

 

View full article

Utterly shameful comments from the draft dodger in chief.

But of course he does have his British fans, will they condemn or defend this latest vomited insult from his foul mouth?

The article highlights a truly reprehensible moment. As someone who deeply values the contributions of our allies—including the brave servicemen and women from the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and across NATO—I find Trump's comments not just "insulting and appalling," but profoundly dangerous.

To dismiss the sacrifice and frontline service of allied troops with baseless claims is more than a political gaffe; it's an affront to every family who lost a loved one in Afghanistan and a betrayal of the solidarity that defines our alliances.

This pattern of undermining and slandering steadfast allies does exactly what you said: it delights our adversaries and weakens the free world's united front.

Prime Minister Starmer's condemnation is necessary and correct. The strongest rebuke we can give is not through personal insults, but by universally and unequivocally reaffirming the valor of these soldiers, stating the factual record of their service, and rejecting any rhetoric that seeks to divide us. We should all hope for, and demand, a full and embarrassing retraction—not for his sake, but for the honor of those he has slandered.

Maybe, one of Trump's cronies should point out that NATO, and others answered the call of the US to send military personnel to Afghanistan.

Major Contributors (Non-NATO):

1. Australia: A key contributor with substantial forces, special operations, and air assets.

2. Sweden: Contributed troops, including a Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Mazar-i-Sharif.

3. Finland: Provided troops and an integrated PRT (with Sweden and Norway).

4. Austria: Provided medical personnel and support.

5. Ireland: Deployed troops for force protection and training roles.

6. New Zealand: Contributed special forces and a PRT in Bamyan Province.

7. Singapore: Provided support personnel, medical teams, and weapon locating radar teams.

8. United Arab Emirates (UAE): Deployed special forces and medical units.

9. Jordan: Provided special forces, training teams, and a hospital.

10. Georgia: Became one of the largest per-capita contributors, with troops serving in high-risk combat areas.

11. Ukraine: Deployed demining experts, medical personnel, and helicopter crews.

12. Azerbaijan: Provided troops, airspace access, and ground transit routes.

13. Mongolia: Sent multiple rotations of troops for security and training roles.

14. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Contributed tactical support units.

15. Colombia: Sent instructors to assist in training Afghan security forces.

16. El Salvador: Deployed troops for security and reconstruction tasks.

17. South Korea: Provided medical and engineering support, as well as civilian reconstruction teams.

What do you expect from this clown. Disgusting and disgraceful insulting fallen Troops. This is how the Yanks thank us for helping them when the come calling for Coalition Troops. Stabbed in the back, Well the next time this clown or future Presidents want backup i hope our defense chief tells them your on your own.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Utterly shameful comments from the draft dodger in chief.

But of course he does have his British fans, will they condemn or defend this latest vomited insult from his foul mouth?

Who are you talking about ?

The only sane person between those two is the Canadian prime minister Keir Starmer! No less insults than Donald deserves and needs to hear. Starmer in comparison to every other state leaders who try to bow to that man, are spineless leaders we now start to learn how weak they are. Danish prime minister getting there, and the Finnish prime minister, a man of wise diplomacy but also showing great leadership for Europe.

Im ashamed of our prime minister and Stoltenberg who have experience and worked with Donald before.

Kim un Jong called Donald a psychopath back in 2017, and never have he spoken more true than that day!

13 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

What do you expect from this clown. Disgusting and disgraceful insulting fallen Troops. This is how the Yanks thank us for helping them when the come calling for Coalition Troops. Stabbed in the back, Well the next time this clown or future Presidents want backup i hope our defense chief tells them your on your own.

This is not ‘Yanks’, is Trump.

3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Who are you talking about ?

The only sane person between those two is the Canadian prime minister Keir Starmer! No less insults than Donald deserves and needs to hear. Starmer in comparison to every other state leasers who try to bow to that man is spineless leaders we now start to learn how weak they are. Danish prime minister getting there, and the Finnish prime minister, a man of wise diplomacy but also showing great leadership for Europe.

Im ashamed of our prime minister and Stoltenberg who have experience and worked with Donald before.

Kim un Jong called Donald a psychopath back in 2017, and never have he spoken more true than that day!

As I was saying.

2 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Who are you talking about ?

The only sane person between those two is the Canadian prime minister Keir Starmer! No less insults than Donald deserves and needs to hear. Starmer in comparison to every other state leasers who try to bow to that man is spineless leaders we now start to learn how weak they are. Danish prime minister getting there, and the Finnish prime minister, a man of wise diplomacy but also showing great leadership for Europe.

Im ashamed of our prime minister and Stoltenberg who have experience and worked with Donald before.

Kim un Jong called Donald a psychopath back in 2017, and never have he spoken more true than that day!

In crazy logic way Trump may be correct.

Our troops were absolutely terrified .....

of US friendly fire !

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Utterly shameful comments from the draft dodger in chief.

But of course he does have his British fans, will they condemn or defend this latest vomited insult from his foul mouth?

Find me one Brit who would defend Trump's remarks.You can't.

This article must have been written by someone with Trumps intellect…

1 Trump is (sadly) a sitting president not former.

2 Starmer is not the Prime Minister of Canada !

Ffs, try and get something right… 🤦🏼‍♂️

Though in fairness to Trump he had at least a point of sorts relating to the German contingent.The Germans did lose 59 men and as might be expected their military is very professional.However for historical reasons on the orders of the German government they were generally kept away from the front line.This is no reflection on the courage and commitment of German soldiers but it does reflect the weight of history which hangs heavily over them.

2 hours ago, ASEAN NOW News said:

In a dramatic confrontation, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has fiercely criticized Donald Trump for his "insulting and frankly appalling" comments regarding British troops' involvement in Afghanistan.

Was Starmer there? Has Starmer ever spent a day in the UK military? No and no.

Gawd, the UK has the whiniest, butt-hurt politicians on the planet. I'm surprised he doesn't insist that Donald Trump's future comments aren't censored.

25 minutes ago, connda said:

Was Starmer there? Has Starmer ever spent a day in the UK military? No and no.

Gawd, the UK has the whiniest, butt-hurt politicians on the planet. I'm surprised he doesn't insist that Donald Trump's future comments aren't censored.

Was Trump there? Has Trump ever spent a day in the US military? No and no.

Seriously, what an idiotic post.

51 minutes ago, jayboy said:

Find me one Brit who would defend Trump's remarks.You can't.

Let's ask @JonnyF - he normally blindly praises everything Trump says and does and blindly criticises Starmer for anything and everything he says and does.

Would be interesting to get his view on this, as he does love the military I believe. It would be extremely painful for him to admit Trump did a bad thing.......can he do it?

And well done to Starmer for having the guts to come out and call it what it was.

1 hour ago, Hummin said:

Who are you talking about ?

The only sane person between those two is the Canadian prime minister Keir Starmer! No less insults than Donald deserves and needs to hear. Starmer in comparison to every other state leaders who try to bow to that man, are spineless leaders we now start to learn how weak they are. Danish prime minister getting there, and the Finnish prime minister, a man of wise diplomacy but also showing great leadership for Europe.

Im ashamed of our prime minister and Stoltenberg who have experience and worked with Donald before.

Kim un Jong called Donald a psychopath back in 2017, and never have he spoken more true than that day!

Not disagreeing at all with the gist of your post ( I'm personally too angry right now to write anything coherent on this ) but Keir Starmer is Prime minister of UK not Canada.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This is not ‘Yanks’, is Trump.

He is their chosen representative. What's more they imposed this repulsive moron on the world 'twice'.

1 hour ago, HighPriority said:

This article must have been written by someone with Trumps intellect…

1 Trump is (sadly) a sitting president not former.

2 Starmer is not the Prime Minister of Canada !

Ffs, try and get something right… 🤦🏼‍♂️

If all the villages in the world sent their village idiots to form a new village, Trump would be their leader.

I can remember when the US elected Trump the 1st time and I said that they wanted the title of the world's dumbest nation back after we did BREXIT... Obviously we took the title back by electing Starmer so they doubled down.

1 hour ago, jayboy said:

Find me one Brit who would defend Trump's remarks.You can't.

Oddly your first response was not to condemn Trump or his utterly disgraceful statement.

I hope this is the end of Western leaders praising Donald Trump.

Stop this nonsense and support our own country. Europe does not need USA anymore, they are not our true allies.

19 minutes ago, Chutney said:

Not disagreeing at all with the gist of your post ( I'm personally too angry right now to write anything coherent on this ) but Keir Starmer is Prime minister of UK not Canada.

Oh my bad, well excuse my ignorance, and I know you are right. I have no excuses for that blunder,

Finding markets other than the USA should now be a priority. Governments should freeze Trump out of meetings. It might send the US into a depression that will force CBS (cankle bone spurs) to rethink his policies.

5 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Finding markets other than the USA should now be a priority. Governments should freeze Trump out of meetings. It might send the US into a depression that will force CBS (cankle bone spurs) to rethink his policies.

Agreed, lets get Xi over for a State Visit (Trump's should have been cancelled already).

16 minutes ago, balo said:

I hope this is the end of Western leaders praising Donald Trump.

Stop this nonsense and support our own country. Europe does not need USA anymore, they are not our true allies.

I’ve consistently said the ‘special relationship’ is one way and abusive.

Shockingly, there are a number of European politicians who, without showing the least indication of shame, back Trump against their own country.

The hypocrisy being they all claim to be patriots.

1 hour ago, connda said:

Was Starmer there? Has Starmer ever spent a day in the UK military? No and no.

Gawd, the UK has the whiniest, butt-hurt politicians on the planet. I'm surprised he doesn't insist that Donald Trump's future comments aren't censored.

So you see nothing wrong in Trump's words? And you would expect the leader of a country - whose servicemen have been killed while supporting an ally - to remain mute and stand idly by while that ally's leader insults their memory?

You and Trump need to recalibrate your respective moral compasses if that's possible.

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve consistently said the ‘special relationship’ is one way and abusive.

I have never thought of it like that, but you are indeed correct

2 hours ago, jayboy said:

Find me one Brit who would defend Trump's remarks.You can't.

Sadly there's many fascist farage types who defend the paedo president

6 minutes ago, ROBERT STARK said:

Sadly there's many fascist farage types who defend the paedo president

Not even Farage (or his supporters) would defend that statement...

45 minutes ago, SamSpade said:

Not even Farage (or his supporters) would defend that statement...

Incredibly many are

3 hours ago, jayboy said:

Though in fairness to Trump he had at least a point of sorts relating to the German contingent.The Germans did lose 59 men and as might be expected their military is very professional.However for historical reasons on the orders of the German government they were generally kept away from the front line.This is no reflection on the courage and commitment of German soldiers but it does reflect the weight of history which hangs heavily over them.

Given Trump's actions in office, it begins to make sense.

56 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

Given Trump's actions in office, it begins to make sense.

What makes sence?? the moron disrepected WAR dead, does not make a diffrence what country, NATO soiders came to the aid of the usa and died for that commitment it should be respected !