Picture courtesy of MGR

The Attorney General for the Protection of People’s Rights has warned social media users that commenting on high-profile criminal cases without verified facts could expose them to prosecution, including possible imprisonment. The warning follows growing online criticism of ongoing cases and highlights that every post and comment can be recorded and used as evidence in court.

On 25 January 2026, Mr Kossolwat Intuchanyong, Director-General of the Office of the Attorney General for the Protection of People’s Rights, issued the warning in a Facebook post. He said online commentators who rely on belief rather than evidence, or who were not present at the scene, risk violating others’ rights and may themselves become suspects under defamation laws or the Computer Crime Act.

Mr Kossolwat stressed that once a complaint is filed, a case formally enters the justice system and investigating officers are legally required to establish the truth. He urged the public to be patient and allow investigations and court proceedings to conclude, noting that premature conclusions and public accusations often prove inaccurate once facts are fully examined or a judgment is delivered.

He cautioned that people who feel supported online may find themselves isolated in court when facing legal action, as social media users do not share responsibility for outcomes. According to Mr Kossolwat, many individuals later seek help from prosecutors to mediate or apologise after being sued, hoping to reduce harm, as mitigation can be considered by courts when determining sentences.

The Attorney General explained that legal knowledge and the ability to manage disputes through lawful means can significantly change outcomes. In some cases, individuals initially accused have successfully reversed their position to become injured parties, while those unfamiliar with the law may make poor decisions that worsen their situation and lead to further charges.

He added that unrestrained online commentary can cause cases to multiply, creating additional legal disputes and personal hardship. Mr Kossolwat emphasised that human dignity is a fundamental right protected by the Thai Constitution and international human rights principles, and that violating this dignity can lead to criminal penalties and civil liability.

Manager online reported that he encouraged the public to refrain from commenting on matters they do not fully understand and to respond cautiously when disputes arise. He advised those facing uncertainty to seek legal guidance through the Office of the Attorney General for the Protection of People’s Rights, including via the 1157 hotline or at one of its more than 100 branches nationwide, to ensure problems are resolved lawfully and responsibly.

Key Takeaways

• Online criticism of ongoing cases without evidence may result in defamation or computer crime charges.

• All social media posts and comments can be retained and used as legal evidence.

• Legal advice and restraint can prevent individuals from becoming suspects or facing multiple cases.

  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from MGRonline 2026-01-27

 

 

Hmmm. Looks to me that protection of people´s rights are in danger, but that is of course only an opinion.

5 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

He said online commentators who rely on belief rather than evidence, or who were not present at the scene, risk violating others’ rights and may themselves become suspects under defamation laws or the Computer Crime Act.

Though this won’t prevent many of the commentators on AN from giving their “expert opinions” here.

Seems like suppression of free speech could possibly be being used as a tool of the government

Is he part of the TCP-Thai Communist Party?

Keep your rug' on son or Elon' and Taco' will tariff ya!🤔

I wonder how many countries like Thailand have "criminalized" libel/defamation laws - which of course are designed in order to silence the majority. It's usually a civil matter in most places (e.g. 'suing someone for libel' - not imprisoning them). Anyone know?