1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us what "proven" violation of the constitution was found against Trump, and what crime he should be arrested for

He should be arrested and tried for treason. He tried to subvert an election. He and his minions tried to prevent the legal transfer of power.

At the very least he should serve the rest of his life in prison, although another punishment would have been far more appropriate given the severity of his crimes.

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us what "proven" violation of the constitution was found against Trump, and what crime he should be arrested for

The OP does not know what are they are talking about, but It will never admit it is wrong.

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us what "proven" violation of the constitution was found against Trump, and what crime he should be arrested for

How about doing your own homework, as I'm not your personal assistant.

You have the habit of asking that question to everyone who posts some FACTS about your master, which you don't want to see because you're blind to his criminal actions.

And yes some of his constitutional violations can be prosecuted criminally, because they resulted in violence and even death.

Translation : You still don't get it

5 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

He should be arrested and tried for treason. He tried to subvert an election. He and his minions tried to prevent the legal transfer of power.

At the very least he should serve the rest of his life in prison, although another punishment would have been far more appropriate given the severity of his crimes.

What sentence would that be? Troll. Even you are not deranged enough to beleive Trump should be executed.

2 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

And yes some of his constitutional violations can be prosecuted criminally, because they resulted in violence and even death.

Which ones? Dont forget the statute number.

6 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

How about doing your own homework, as I'm not your personal assistant.

You have the habit of asking that question to everyone who posts some FACTS about your master, which you don't want to see because you're blind to his criminal actions.

And yes some of his constitutional violations can be prosecuted criminally, because they resulted in violence and even death.

Translation : You still don't get it

You regurgitate a lot of nonsense and then howl about doing research when you get called on it.

Then why did the Biden DOJ not prosecute him?

28 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us what "proven" violation of the constitution was found against Trump, and what crime he should be arrested for

You are plainly unable to understand.

Inflammatory posts and replies have been removed:

• Be polite and respectful to other users.

• Do not post defamatory, offensive, or discriminatory content.

• Avoid flaming, trolling, or stalking other members.

1 minute ago, novanova said:

You are plainly unable to understand.

So, as usual, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Just another know-nothing leftist regurgitating idiocy.

5 minutes ago, novanova said:

You are plainly unable to understand.

I understand perfectly, if you are going to accuse someone of a crime, at least have a statute ready

On 2/19/2026 at 8:41 PM, novanova said:

In the UK, a monarchy, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested for illegal conduct.

In the US, the President has violated the constitution many, many times.

The Foreign Emoluments Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8) prohibits any person holding office from accepting gifts, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without Congressional consent.

No action is taken.

What a contrast!

Please tell us what gift Trump has retained without either purchasing it, or getting the approval of Congress.

9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Please tell us what gift Trump has retained without either purchasing it, or getting the approval of Congress.

The US Department of Justice is facing a federal lawsuit for refusing to release a legal memorandum that reportedly cleared the way for Donald Trump’s acceptance of a $400m luxury aircraft from Qatar’s government.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation, represented by the watchdog group American Oversight, filed the Freedom of Information Act (Foia) lawsuit in Washington DC’s federal district court after the justice department failed to produce the document despite granting expedited processing more than two months ago.

The president’s “deal to take a $400m luxury jet from a foreign government deserves full public scrutiny – not a stiff-arm from the Department of Justice”, American Oversight’s executive director, Chioma Chukwu, said in a press release. “This is precisely the kind of corrupt arrangement that public records laws are designed to expose.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/28/trump-jet-qatar-memo-lawsuit

Just now, CallumWK said:

The US Department of Justice is facing a federal lawsuit for refusing to release a legal memorandum that reportedly cleared the way for Donald Trump’s acceptance of a $400m luxury aircraft from Qatar’s government.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation, represented by the watchdog group American Oversight, filed the Freedom of Information Act (Foia) lawsuit in Washington DC’s federal district court after the justice department failed to produce the document despite granting expedited processing more than two months ago.

The president’s “deal to take a $400m luxury jet from a foreign government deserves full public scrutiny – not a stiff-arm from the Department of Justice”, American Oversight’s executive director, Chioma Chukwu, said in a press release. “This is precisely the kind of corrupt arrangement that public records laws are designed to expose.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/28/trump-jet-qatar-memo-lawsuit

It's not a "gift" to Trump.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

What sentence would that be? Troll. Even you are not deranged enough to beleive Trump should be executed.

No but from the looks of it another poster believes he should.

31 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It's not a "gift" to Trump.

I like the way he uses an FOIA request correctly denied to show criminal activity. LOL. Sad

13 hours ago, Yagoda said:

I like the way he uses an FOIA request correctly denied to show criminal activity. LOL. Sad

Again, he's just another know-nothing leftist regurgitator.

Why are the left not howling about the billion-plus donations going to the Obama library?

You can bet the million in jewelry the Saudis gifted the Obama's will be hanging in his library.

On 2/19/2026 at 8:41 PM, novanova said:

In the UK, a monarchy, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested for illegal conduct.

In the US, the President has violated the constitution many, many times.

The Foreign Emoluments Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8) prohibits any person holding office from accepting gifts, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without Congressional consent.

No action is taken.

What a contrast!

USA under dictator Trump = lawless country

2 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

The only liar here is you, or is it that you are that stupid? No need to answer that question because everyone knows.

But of course we were not surprised that SCOTUS, which was weaponized by Trump, would not rule against him.

Typical know-nothing Trump obsessed leftist cult member's idea of evidence: "everyone knows".

Multiple posts breaking forum rules removed @novanova

General approach and policy.

We maintain a strict policy of accepting links or content only from mainstream and recognised media sources to ensure that information posted by members is both verifiable and trustworthy. We strive to remain impartial, prioritizing content that meets these standards and removing content that, in our opinion, does not.

Rule 39a. Posts should be original, on-topic, and written in your own voice. This is a discussion forum—not an AI content dump—so keep contributions natural and personal. AI tools can be used for reference or to support facts, but your writing should reflect your own understanding and perspective. This is especially important for opening posts, which should clearly come from a human point of view and invite genuine discussion.

Low-Value Posts Reminder.

Posts that add no written contribution harm the forum and reduce its value for readers and search engines.

This includes:

2–3 word replies

Emoji-only posts

Memes or GIFs with no explanation or context.

Screenshots with no supporting text

Embedded social media posts with no comment or opinion

Youtube videos with no explanation or comment

If your post does not explain, add context, or express a view in your own words, it has no value here.

What happens next

Any such content will be removed without notice

Repeat posting of this type may lead to further moderation action

If you want to post a meme, image, or screenshot, add a short explanation or your view.

If you have nothing to add in text, don’t post.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

You can bet the million in jewelry the Saudis gifted the Obama's will be hanging in his library.

Link please for both the gift and the library where the gift is hanging according to you.

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

Link please for both the gift and the library where the gift is hanging according to you.

First, are you saying the Saudis did not make give the Obamas any jewelry? And if they did, are you going to apologize?

And you need to read more carefully. I never said it was hanging in a library, I said it will be hanging in the Obama Library (as it should) when it is complete. Right now, I understand it is in the National Archives.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

First, are you saying the Saudis did not make give the Obamas any jewelry? And if they did, are you going to apologize?

And you need to read more carefully. I never said it was hanging in a library, I said it will be hanging in the Obama Library (as it should) when it is complete. Right now, I understand it is in the National Archives.

I asked for links to your claims.

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

I asked for links to your claims.

First, are you saying the Saudis did not make give the Obamas any jewelry? And if they did, are you going to apologize?

And you need to read more carefully. I never said it was hanging in a library, I said it will be hanging in the Obama Library (as it should) when it is complete. Right now, I understand it is in the National Archives.