Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

UK reportedly blocks Trump using British RAF bases for Iran strike

Featured Replies

7 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Wrong.

A pity you don't know the difference between facts and opinions.

  • Replies 133
  • Views 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Patong2021
    Patong2021

    Not standing up, just afraid of Iranian retaliation. Also, Starmer needs to keep the support of his muslim and radical leftist party members or else he is gone.

  • If true, good to see countries standing up to Trump.

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    The UK has a sordid history of joining illegal wars with the U.S. Starmer is wise not to have any part in a war Trump wishes to drag the UK into.

Posted Images

15 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not supporting military action that has no legal basis (illegal war) is not being on the wrong side of the situation.

Is the Ukraine war legal?

  • Popular Post
20 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is the Ukraine war legal?

Ukraine’s defense of it’s territory is legal.

Russia’s war on Ukraine is illegal.

But you knew that.

On 2/22/2026 at 12:20 AM, stevenl said:

A pity you don't know the difference between facts and opinions.

It's a pity you just don't know facts. 🙂

On 2/21/2026 at 4:10 PM, Yellowtail said:

You have an organization with five rich people and 200 poor people and we're going to vote on where the money goes. Sounds great.

Is it your position the UN should be dictate which military actions are to be taken, and by who?

Apologies, obviously went over your head.

Control of the UN is inconsistant with the fundamental aims of the organisation, not fit for purpose.

1 minute ago, sandyf said:

Apologies, obviously went over your head.

Control of the UN is inconsistant with the fundamental aims of the organisation, not fit for purpose.

No, given your response has nothing to do with my comments, it appears to have gone over your head.

Again, is it your position the UN should dictate which military actions are to be taken, and by who?

On 2/22/2026 at 12:19 AM, Patong2021 said:

The UN gave up its impartial standing and integrity long ago. This is the organization that appointed despot nations as guardians of basic human rights and women's rights. It failed to act in Syria, in Yemen, in the Congo, in Haiti and in the Darfur, but here you come to proclaim its supremacy in this matter. The UN is a corrupt organization contaminated by political bias.

Obviously English is not your first language.

5 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Obviously English is not your first language.

Are you above conversing with non-native English speakers?

Perhaps we should mandate only native English speakers in the UN.

Just now, Yellowtail said:

No, given your response has nothing to do with my comments, it appears to have gone over your head.

Again, is it your position the UN should dictate which military actions are to be taken, and by who?

It is against the rules to try and distort the context of my comment.

4 minutes ago, sandyf said:

It is against the rules to try and distort the context of my comment.

And year again, right over your head.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

is it your position the UN should dictate which military actions are to be taken, and by who?

It would be a lot safer than letting TRUMP and PUTIN keep on doing it!

41 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

It would be a lot safer than letting TRUMP and PUTIN keep on doing it!

No, it would not. Per the rules, please provide links to support your made-up nonsense!

Again, you have been caught making unsupported false claims because you have nothing!

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

No, it would not. Per the rules, please provide links to support your made-up nonsense!

Again, you have been caught making unsupported false claims because you have nothing!

What a load of B.S!

I have stated my OPINION which I wholeheartedly believe to be true but as it is in my brain I am not giving you or anyone a link to it!

51 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

What a load of B.S!

I have stated my OPINION which I wholeheartedly believe to be true but as it is in my brain I am not giving you or anyone a link to it!

No, again you are being untruthful, you made statements as FACT without qualification. Per the rules, please provide links to support your made-up nonsense!

Again, you have been caught making unsupported false claims because you have nothing!

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.