"I was against the war before I was for it".....she might have to say.

16 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

boo hoo, dry your eyes and blow your nose,

anyway let he who is without sin cast the first stone, ( not applicable in muslim countries of course)

have you never stolen anything ?

Holy crap, can your moral bankruptcy be any more obvious? Despicable.

13 minutes ago, Wingate said:

I guess you fully support the Iraq invasion, too. And Afghanistan for 20 years.

The ayatollah was a bad guy. No argument there. Saddam was also a bad guy. And the Taliban are most definitely bad guys. Tough to say who was worse. Oh, and the little guy with the bad haircut to whom Trump wrote "love letters" is a really really bad guy---and he has nukes and Hwasong 20s that can hit the US.

I didn't know you were a Neocon.

I don't support boots on the ground. That North Korean guy is hard to kill.

20 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

Evil has only one future. None.

Tell that to China,North Korea and Russia they are all doing quite well out of it and have been for many years with no end in sight.

2 minutes ago, Jimjim1 said:

Tell that to China,North Korea and Russia they are all doing quite well out of it and have been for many years with no end in sight.

China, North Korea and Russia, along with most of it's people, aren't the problem. Megalomaniac tyrants are. They are the evil which should be eliminated. The same for Iran.

9 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Another know nothing MAGA zombie. Iran's regime has not been overturned and the hard right guard will continue the status quo.

I know just as much as you

I have no connection to"MAGA" (although I see nothing wrong with the slogan , )

I am not even American

I am well aware that regime has not been overturned , hence my comment that Iranian people can see a real chance of being liberated

There are two Iranian guys, both muay thai "students" living near me and both are rather emotional about this to the point of crying tears of joy, how many Iranians have you spoken to ?

I am genuinely interested to know ,

Do you wish for the Iranian people to live their lives under such a barbaric regime?

Are you not concerned about the unbalanced, islamist regime achieving a nuclear capability?

Is it just your hatred of Trump that leads you to object to the military action?

How do you think the obvious threat posed to the rest of the world by Iran should be addressed ?

Don't even think of suggesting it can all be sorted via diplomacy , that is clearly as ridiculous as attempting to cure stage 4 cancer with aromatherapy

Finally, imagine the following scenario,

You take a boat trip and the unthinkable happens, the boat sinks and you are left floating in the sea, desperately clinging to a piece of wood .

Eventually you become exhausted and are close to drowning , but by a miracle a passing fishing boat spots you and comes to your rescue,

But you recognise the guy throwing you the lifeline, as a convicted criminal, who has a string of unproven allegations made against him on social media,

Would you grab the rope and be pulled to safety ? or would you refuse on principle?

I think we both know the answer

4 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

They are the evil which should be eliminated. The same for Iran.

Agreed but with almost limitless cannon fodder in just one of those countries do you think it a good idea to try to eliminate it.

1 hour ago, Sunmaster said:

Holy crap, can your moral bankruptcy be any more obvious? Despicable.

Another, with " principles " who has no problem condemning 90 million iranians to continue living under a barbaric islamist regime forever, and the rest of the world to live with the constant threat of being nuked by these savages absolutely disgusting , shame on you

4 minutes ago, Jimjim1 said:

Agreed but with almost limitless cannon fodder in just one of those countries do you think it a good idea to try to eliminate it.

There's always ways to find those in charge, like they did this time. Eliminate them, and all who follow their brand of insanity, and what's left are the possible good leaders

6 minutes ago, Jimjim1 said:

Agreed but with almost limitless cannon fodder in just one of those countries do you think it a good idea to try to eliminate it.

If you had cancer would you attempt to treat it bearing in mind the side effects of chemo might be unpleasant for a while , or would you just roll over and die ?

20 minutes ago, Jimjim1 said:

Tell that to China,North Korea and Russia they are all doing quite well out of it and have been for many years with no end in sight.

exactly how is North Korea "doing quite well" ?

7 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

exactly how is North Korea "doing quite well" ?

By perpetrating evil upon its own people, remember that particular monster annihilated his uncle with a cannon and then laughed at the result, and his brother with poison in an airport.

15 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

If you had cancer would you attempt to treat it bearing in mind the side effects of chemo might be unpleasant for a while , or would you just roll over and die ?

Having been diagnosed with throat cancer at age 75 and my response was “ oh well I have had good life “ I am sorry but I do not see the analogy but you obviously do.

22 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

There's always ways to find those in charge, like they did this time. Eliminate them, and all who follow their brand of insanity, and what's left are the possible good leaders

Trump !

According to the skit on SNL the letters fit on Hegseths knuckles as a new tattoo

The clowns in charge of Iran needed to go only Israel and the USA have the power to remove them

The UK especially 2 Tier Kier the worst Leader Britain has ever had and Europe are all weak talk the talk don't walk the walk and the United Nations are a waste of space

Hope it works out for the people of Iran

On 3/1/2026 at 6:59 PM, Terrance8812 said:

Why call it "Operation Epic Fury"? - Because "Operation Epstein Diversion" didn't sound Trumpian enough.

Well, never mind, here are some of DJT's historical Tweets between 2011 and 2013 on Iran:

Nov 29, 2011

In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran.

Nov 16, 2011

Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He is weak and he is ineffective. So the only way he figures that he is going to get reelected, and as sure as you are sitting there, is to start a war with Iran.

July 3, 2012

Just as I predicted, @BarackObama is preparing a possible attack on Iran right before November.

Aug 16, 2012

I always said @BarackObama will attack Iran, in some form, prior to the election.

Oct 9, 2012

Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in a tailspin watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.

Oct 22, 2012

Do not let Obama play the Iran card in order to start a war in order to get elected. Be careful Republicans!

Aug 31, 2013

Be prepared, there is a small chance that our horrendous leadership could unknowingly lead us into World War III.

Sep 16, 2013

I predict that President Obama will at some point attack Iran in order to save face!

Sep 25, 2013

Remember what I previously said. Obama will someday attack Iran in order to show how tough he is.

Nov 11, 2013

Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly. Not skilled!

Mod edit - fake AI video removed

How epic isnt that?

Remember this when you enjoying hour travels to family during Christmas and Easter, nothing is Holy anymore, because Donald used Ramadan to target his Enimies, same as Putin, and we know Putin is a rat dont we?

3 hours ago, OutofLondon said:

That’s the same type of bs and lies they used to justify attacking Iraq 35 years ago and it’s as untrue now as it was then. Also, do you mean your wonderful president was lying when he told the world he’d destroyed Iran’s nuclear programme last year? If not, I don’t understand why you need to do the job twice if you did it properly the first time.

Pathetic. The nuclear program was stopped, destroyed. We hoped they'd take the hint. Then they started it up again, along with ballistic missiles and daily chants of "death to America". I fail to follow your "argument".

Some call it operation “Epstein Fury”. Kinda makes sense. If Trump didn’t bow to BB the later would’ve unleashed the “Epstein Fury” on Trump. 😂😂😂

22 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

There is a difference between investing and stealing. Trump is a thief.

Fair comment- and as Trump has 34 felony convictions he cannot deny it- although of course he will

2 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Another, with " principles " who has no problem condemning 90 million iranians to continue living under a barbaric islamist regime forever....

'Oh will someone please think of the poor Iranians!' - because of course that's what this is all about.

Give me a break.

1 hour ago, Hummin said:

How epic isnt that?

Remember this when you enjoying hour travels to family during Christmas and Easter, nothing is Holy anymore, because Donald used Ramadan to target his Enimies, same as Putin, and we know Putin is a rat dont we?

Have you forgotten about attacks on Christmas markets?

2 hours ago, Jimjim1 said:

Trump !

Is doing the work of god.

49 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

'Oh will someone please think of the poor Iranians!' - because of course that's what this is all about.

Give me a break.

How is the Iran conflict about you? Nobody needs to give you anything.

Maybe someone knows the answer to this.

We know about the enriching of nuclear material, which can be used to make nuclear weapons OR to make nuclear energy for electric power.

We haven't heard about a nuclear weapons manufacturing site.

We (that is, I) haven't heard of any nuclear power sites being constructed.

We know that high quality uranium enriching is needed by small power plants.

So where is the evidence that they were enriching for weapons use?

11 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Maybe someone knows the answer to this.

We know about the enriching of nuclear material, which can be used to make nuclear weapons OR to make nuclear energy for electric power.

We haven't heard about a nuclear weapons manufacturing site.

We (that is, I) haven't heard of any nuclear power sites being constructed.

We know that high quality uranium enriching is needed by small power plants.

So where is the evidence that they were enriching for weapons use?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-868e3c3d-25ec-43cb-bcc0-8832464b91ca

Israel believes it to be true. I believe Israel.

1 hour ago, Kinnock said:

Have you forgotten about attacks on Christmas markets?

I haven´t forgotten anything, but I a missing the big lines where this have been tradition, and also directly taking out states leaders in a bomb attack Saddam and Gaddafi was executed by their own, not by the united forces.

There is always a fine balance how to proceed with conflicts, and also the true reason why it happens right now.

3 hours ago, Jimjim1 said:

Having been diagnosed with throat cancer at age 75 and my response was “ oh well I have had good life “ I am sorry but I do not see the analogy but you obviously do.

It would be somewhat bizarre if I did not understand my own analogy , Its not rocket science so i will endeavour to explain but before I do, let me clarify that I also have cancer and I did not use the analogy flippantly.

On receiving the diagnosis we have a choice whether to fight it or submit to it . none of us can fight it alone, medical assistance is required,

For your own reasons you appear to have chosen not to fight it and that's entirely up to you. Those of us who decide to fight it are well aware that the treatment will probably be very unpleasant, often more unpleasant that the symptoms of the disease, but on balance they consider it worthwhile , short term pain for (hopefully) long term gain, at least we all have the choice

The people of Iran, up until now have not had the choice to fight the oppressive regime, they could not do it alone, they tried but were slaughtered in the tens of thousands by the barbaric regime. now that they have some assistance from the US and Israel its a different matter, they can see the possibility of a brighter future , the light at the end of a very long and very dark tunnel.

They are well aware that there will inevitably be pain, but ultimately they are prepared to bear that pain, in the hope of a much better future for themselves, their children and their grandchildren. Just like cancer treatment , there are no guarantees, but they are prepared to give it a go and who can blame them? Can you even imagine what it must be like living under such conditions.

As an aside I doubt very much that they are particularly bothered whether the leaders of the countries helping to destroy the barbaric regime, are convicted criminals , or in contravention of some non existent international law , unlike some of the bed wetters on here.

One does not have to approve of Trump or Israel to support the liberation of a nation from an evil regime, it doesn't even matter if they have their own alternative reasons for doing so . After all my oncologist is not treating me out of the goodness of his heart or sincere concern for my survival, Its his job , he gets paid for it , it puts food on his table and a roof over his head, I don't even care if he's a raving leftist its totally irrelevant

2 hours ago, johnnybangkok said:

'Oh will someone please think of the poor Iranians!' - because of course that's what this is all about.

Give me a break.

Sorry I was mistaken, it all about you isn't it You, your hatred of Trump , and your obsession with these so called "Epstein files" How could I ever have forgotten,?

As for me I just like seeing evil islamist regimes getting destroyed, I don't really care whether its in Iran or any other islamic $hith0le The earth needs ridding of this malignant death cult

On 3/2/2026 at 1:01 PM, Bday Prang said:

how about "operation removal of malignant islamist regime" It won't affect the mid terms , the losers and traitors who refuse to support their democratically elected President will still be losers and haters .

It might even work against him , many people, even some supporters of President Trump are snowflakes and do not have the strength of character required to support military action,

Even you are now descending to a new low by calling Americans who express opposition to Trump's policies traitors. And I thought you were an intelligent man.

Dogmatic, and intolerant is more like it..