1 minute ago, stevenl said:

You're simply ignoring what happened, the facts, based on your opinion.

The facts are, case closed, and nothing to charge Trump with, as pointed out by @CallumWK above. Feel free to continue on, but without me. CASE CLOSED

... "AI Overview

Donald Trump was not charged based on the 2019 Mueller investigation after Joe Biden became president primarily because the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Attorney General Merrick Garland did not reopen the closed Mueller investigation, adhering to established precedents regarding the finality of special counsel investigations ...

• Finality of the Investigation: The Mueller investigation concluded in March 2019, and Attorney General Bill Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had already decided that the evidence was insufficient to establish a finding of obstruction of justice. The investigation was officially closed " ...

4 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

The facts are, case closed, and nothing to charge Trump with, as pointed out by @CallumWK above. Feel free to continue on, but without me. CASE CLOSED

Selective MAGA reading again?

From my post

Mueller's Approach: Mueller stopped short of a criminal indictment, partially because DOJ policy forbade indicting a sitting president, but also because his team felt it would be unfair to accuse a person of a crime without giving them a chance to clear their name in court.

7 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

The facts are, case closed, and nothing to charge Trump with, as pointed out by @CallumWK above. Feel free to continue on, but without me. CASE CLOSED

Was not charged, that's true. There was no collusion, as you claimed earlier, not true according to Muller, the other investigators and the Senate commission lead by Rubio.

You're even stating the facts and the reason no charges were brought in your post. But still you choose to ignore the facts.

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Of course a certain political system and an economic system can work together. Don't tell me you're really conflating democracy and capitalism?

oops ... I did. Although, a socialist system isn't, actually rarely, democratic. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Also a capitalist system, like USA, doesn't seem to accept too many socialist ideas.

Along with, such a corrupt and failed govt as the USA, seems anything they touch, they screw up.

I would like to see the energy sector nationalized, along with healthcare & education. For oil companies to have 'windfall' profits, aside from outrageous annual profits, and healthcare & education not free for all, is simply not acceptable in my imaginary world of fairness.

3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Was not charged, that's true. There was no collusion, as you claimed earlier, not true according to Muller, the other investigators and the Senate commission lead by Rubio.

You're even stating the facts and the reason no charges were brought in your post. But still you choose to ignore the facts.

I'm a firm believer of innocent till proven guilty. CASE CLOSED

8 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Selective MAGA reading again?

From my post

Mueller's Approach: Mueller stopped short of a criminal indictment, partially because DOJ policy forbade indicting a sitting president, but also because his team felt it would be unfair to accuse a person of a crime without giving them a chance to clear their name in court.

Simply pointed out the facts, not the assumptions. To repeat 'innocent till proven guilty'.

Not even charged ... CASE CLOSED

Y'all have a nice day

1 minute ago, KhunLA said:

I'm a firm believer of innocent till proven guilty. CASE CLOSED

So am I in a court of law. But with clear facts as here: he's guilty.
But we're making progress, following your reasoning you are now changing from 'not guilty' to 'not proven guilty'.

8 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So am I in a court of law. But with clear facts as here: he's guilty.
But we're making progress, following your reasoning you are now changing from 'not guilty' to 'not proven guilty'.

Not at all. To repeat, for last time, looking for dirt is different than fabricating dirt.

He apparently did nothing wrong, or he would have been charged. Think of all the stuff thrown at him already, whether evidence or not, and why almost all, didn't stick. And other, still on appeal.

They would have charged him no matter, harder in criminal than civil cases, so they didn't bother, which is very telling. As they love to keep him tied up with legal issues & headlines.

HAVE A NICE DAY

5 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Not at all. To repeat, for last time, looking for dirt is different than fabricating dirt.

He apparently did nothing wrong, or he would have been charged. Think of all the stuff thrown at him already, whether evidence or not, and why almost all, didn't stick. And other, still on appeal.

They would have charged him no matter, harder in criminal than civil cases, so they didn't bother, which is very telling. As they love to keep him tied up with legal issues & headlines.

HAVE A NICE DAY

Ignoring facts, clear as day. Ignoring both the conclusions from the report and the report itself, plus the reasons there was no charge.

5 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Simply pointed out the facts, not the assumptions. To repeat 'innocent till proven guilty'.

Not even charged ... CASE CLOSED

Y'all have a nice day

That includes Hunter Biden?