What a hypocritical A-hole this guy is.

He's a Muslim so it goes without saying that he is a raving hypocrite. Sure there are good ones amongst them but they are spineless and won't stand up to the extremists.

Just go down Walking Street any night of the week, or around the Arab quarter. They are all there drinking, gambling, doing drugs and whoring.

The UK government won't do anything about these scumbags, the police are tied down with unnecessary red tape and PC nonsense so they are powerless. The only people left are the British public who will suffer just so much and then there will come a day of reckoning.

It is coming time for a new Krystalnacht.

You know Phil, you just blew me away with your last sentence. Are you seriously suggesting that genocide is a solution for the problem of intolerant Muslims?

Kristallnacht itself was not genocide, however it was one of the precursors to the holocaust.

Maybe Phil means that the mosques should be burnt, Muslim homes and businesses destroyed, and the formation of concentration camps for Muslims ?

I don't agree with the generalisations about Muslims being hypocrites etc, although I can see how it easy to think that given the amount of vile verbal diarrhea coming from the extremists mouths, which IMO is intended to cause a widening of the gap between the local and immigrant population.

The government should get tough on ALL immigration matters, and any immigrant wishing for sharia law or a muslim government should be sent back to where there is one in place. The others who are quite happy to integrate as best they can and lead a good life within the law are welcome, as they also add to the rich multicultural life of the UK

Totster

Off topic, maybe, but with the hoops that Thais have to jump through in order to get visas for visiting UK (and the rest of Europe) how come there are so many extremist Muslims living and working in the UK, both legally and illegally?

Yes, it's intended to polarise opinion both in muslims and non-muslims, with the growing divide ultimately driving borderline radical muslims to extremism and perhaps shifting the conservative muslim base as well. Immigration law needs to be revamped so that there is no guarantee of permanency for people who seek citizenship and then do not comply with local law - including hate crimes and incitement towards treasonous activity.

In the UK such legislation is already in place.

The problem is the reluctance of the CPS and Immigration authorities to enforce it, as appeals through European human rights legislation will take years, cost a lot of money and probably result in the original expulsion order being quashed.

The Uk should withdraw from all such legislation as being inimical to the customs and laws of the sovereign state.

I think he was born in Newcastle.

So was Abbatitt (or however the Thai PM's name is spelt)

Off topic, maybe, but with the hoops that Thais have to jump through in order to get visas for visiting UK (and the rest of Europe) how come there are so many extremist Muslims living and working in the UK, both legally and illegally?

Both are symptoms of the years of mass, uncontrolled immigration, primarily from the Indian Sub-Continent.

Off topic, maybe, but with the hoops that Thais have to jump through in order to get visas for visiting UK (and the rest of Europe) how come there are so many extremist Muslims living and working in the UK, both legally and illegally?

Both are symptoms of the years of mass, uncontrolled immigration, primarily from the Indian Sub-Continent.

Is this the same Indian sub-continent that Britain raped and pillaged for so many years?

Oh dear,

I don't think Britain had the monopoly of R &P on the sub-continent. The locals were quite good at it themselves.

Yes I know. I was just trying to put forward an alternative point of view. It is sometimes impossible to refuse certain individuals from the sub-continent when it was, for so long, a colony.

Is this the same Indian sub-continent that Britain raped and pillaged for so many years?

On that school of thought, perhaps I should have moved to Scandinavia, afterall, how many years did the vikings rape and pillage in the UK? I'm sorry, but, I don't accept that argument. If anything, it was even more of a reason not to allow it; we had witnessed first hand how certain races/religions didn't get along very well, so, why put them in the 'cooking pot' back here?

Had Britain not colonized India, it wouldn't be the rising economic powerhouse it is today. It's also very telling that the same can't be said of the old East & West Pakistan, what's the common denominator?

Yes I know. I was just trying to put forward an alternative point of view. It is sometimes impossible to refuse certain individuals from the sub-continent when it was, for so long, a colony.

It's not impossible at all; everything in life isn't & doesn't have to be fair; there are times when you must look after the self at the expense of others.

Is this the same Indian sub-continent that Britain raped and pillaged for so many years?

On that school of thought, perhaps I should have moved to Scandinavia, afterall, how many years did the vikings rape and pillage in the UK? I'm sorry, but, I don't accept that argument. If anything, it was even more of a reason not to allow it; we had witnessed first hand how certain races/religions didn't get along very well, so, why put them in the 'cooking pot' back here?

Had Britain not colonized India, it wouldn't be the rising economic powerhouse it is today. It's also very telling that the same can't be said of the old East & West Pakistan, what's the common denominator?

The vikings integrated into Britian and Ireland, I'm a descendant of the vikings myself! Thankfully no one is telling me to go home, etc. Or maybe you think I should? You're impossible...

Off topic, maybe, but with the hoops that Thais have to jump through in order to get visas for visiting UK (and the rest of Europe) how come there are so many extremist Muslims living and working in the UK, both legally and illegally?

Both are symptoms of the years of mass, uncontrolled immigration, primarily from the Indian Sub-Continent.

Is this the same sub-continent that provided the largest volunteer army the world has ever seen, consisting of 1.5 million Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus, that volunteered to fight side by side with the Allied forces in World War II? Is this the same sub-continent that's provided the British Army with 13 Ghurka winners of the Victoria Cross?

Is this the same sub-continent that provided the largest volunteer army the world has ever seen, consisting of 1.5 million Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus, that volunteered to fight side by side with the Allied forces in World War II? Is this the same sub-continent that's provided the British Army with 13 Ghurka winners of the Victoria Cross?

They wouldn't have volunteered for nothing had we not colonized them first, but some of you have a problem with that.

It doesn't seem that long ago that we all said we'd agree to differ and move on...

It doesn't seem that long ago that we all said we'd agree to differ and move on...

You're right there!

Is this the same Indian sub-continent that Britain raped and pillaged for so many years?

Had Britain not colonized India, it wouldn't be the rising economic powerhouse it is today. It's also very telling that the same can't be said of the old East & West Pakistan, what's the common denominator?

i think i get your point Seyton Clamour. you mean Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, holding british citizenship, very rarely marry Thai ladies, then live with them in the boonies and when -once in a while- abroad bitch and take pictures of Nigerians checking in a lot of luggage?

Off topic, maybe, but with the hoops that Thais have to jump through in order to get visas for visiting UK (and the rest of Europe) how come there are so many extremist Muslims living and working in the UK, both legally and illegally?

Both are symptoms of the years of mass, uncontrolled immigration, primarily from the Indian Sub-Continent.

Is this the same sub-continent that provided the largest volunteer army the world has ever seen, consisting of 1.5 million Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus, that volunteered to fight side by side with the Allied forces in World War II? Is this the same sub-continent that's provided the British Army with 13 Ghurka winners of the Victoria Cross?

The Ghurka question relates to Nepal, not a former British territory.

They have been treated very badly by the successive British governments and now the Kingdom Republic is a basket case.