Go for it, guys!

First answer already mentions 2-3 options.

What is the difference between: Occasionally and sometimes?

Change maybe?

?

This is moronic, if the people that do not vote usually do not vote as usual you have nothing but meaningless non-data, basically just nonsense.

Occasionally and sometimes and maybe, depends on the poll

This is moronic, if the people that do not vote usually do not vote as usual you have nothing but meaningless non-data, basically just nonsense.

Of course it is moronic, nay, ridiculous even, refer the the title of the thread and its location in Farang Pub forum.

I love its contradictory nature, well done, OP.

And in line with most surveys, the results will be used to prove some totally specious theory (Refer most economic surveys before and after (and during!) the Global Financial Crisis.).

This is a great poll. It nearly proves that polls are always sometimes occasionaly not very reliable, although sometimes polls prove the opposite and is not the very often the case.

Well done op!

I especially admire the 4 (so far) who never vote in polls who forgot who they were for a moment and inadvertently voted - do they need to change their votes now???

3BG... Very clever! I always thought that there are only two categories of people: (1) Those who put people into categories, and (2) Those that don't. Your poll now proves this is indeed true. (Trust me... it really does.)

I didn't vote.

I didn't vote.

But by publicly admitting that you didn't vote you, de facto, voted in this poll. The only truly non-contradictory non poll voters are those who crept in, didn't cr@p and crept out again.

Beware the lurkers.

btw I voted that I never voted in polls because to not vote that I don't vote in polls is a double negative.

-x-=+

I voted, And then?

What does "Null Vote" means when I go straight to the results?

I can't believe so many fell for this!

I can't believe so many fell for this!

I, and I presume others, are really turned on by the Zen nature of the poll.