A growing group of Labour MPs is considering forcing a symbolic parliamentary vote to highlight opposition to proposed immigration changes led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood. The move reflects mounting internal tensions within the party over plans to tighten rules on settlement, particularly the proposal to extend the qualifying period for permanent residency. Get today's headlines by email Under the proposed reforms, most migrants would need to wait 10 years—rather than the current five—before being eligible for indefinite leave to remain, which allows individuals to live and work in the UK permanently. The changes would also affect care workers and refugees, requiring longer waiting periods before they can settle. Dispute over settlement rule changesThe Home Office has indicated that the reforms can be introduced without new legislation, meaning they would not automatically be subject to a parliamentary vote. However, critics are now exploring procedural options to trigger a non-binding vote to publicly register their opposition. Settlement rights, also known as indefinite leave to remain, provide access to employment, education and, where eligible, state benefits. Backbench backlash growsOpposition within Labour has so far largely been expressed privately, but discontent is becoming more visible. A group of around 100 MPs has already written to Ms Mahmood urging her to reconsider the proposals. Angela Rayner has also criticised aspects of the plan, particularly the intention to apply new rules to migrants already living in the UK, describing the approach as unacceptable. Some MPs argue the reforms would break implicit commitments made to people who had already built lives in Britain under the existing system. Others have described their opposition as fundamental, calling for the proposals to be scrapped entirely rather than adjusted. One MP said reversing course would be preferable to proceeding with policies they viewed as flawed, while another warned that the issue had already surfaced during recent local election campaigning. Government considers adjustmentsDowning Street has suggested it may introduce transitional arrangements that could soften the impact on migrants already in the UK. The Home Office is reviewing responses to a public consultation that has received around 200,000 submissions. Officials say the reforms are necessary to restore confidence in the immigration system and address the effects of high levels of net migration in recent years. A spokesperson said settlement should be earned rather than automatic, pointing to government figures showing net migration increased the UK population by 2.6 million between 2021 and 2024. Political divisions widenDespite the backlash, the proposals have support within parts of the Labour Party, particularly among MPs concerned about electoral pressure from rival parties. Some lawmakers have warned that abandoning the reforms could damage Labour’s standing in constituencies where immigration is a key issue. Opposition parties remain divided. The Conservatives have indicated they may support tougher measures, while the Liberal Democrats oppose the changes. Reform UK has said it would go further by removing settlement rights altogether if elected. Although any parliamentary vote would not be binding, MPs pushing for it believe it could expose internal divisions and increase pressure on ministers to reconsider. The issue is expected to be debated in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords in the coming months. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026
View full article
Create an account or sign in to comment