Another Implausible Story.

[yorkie100]

A foreign thief on Samui has drugged the receptionist at a tourist hotel to escape with a large haul of guests' valuables, Samui police have confirmed.

Edited January 9, 2013 by Boo
we are not permitted to link to this website.

[BigC]

where the hell is "Bo Phuket Police Station, one of two on Samui."

[Boater]

Interesting ! But this topic will be shut soon as you cannot link from pw

[phetphet]

already mentioned in this forum earlier today.

[yorkie100]

Interesting ! But this topic will be shut soon as you cannot link from pw

Really? Unjustifiable censorship if it is.

It is after all a news story about Samui.

[Boater]

Interesting ! But this topic will be shut soon as you cannot link from pw

Really? Unjustifiable censorship if it is.

It is after all a news story about Samui.

Same with bkk post and Andrew Drummond .. Rules are rules

Maybe another paper has the same story ?

[yorkie100]

where the hell is "Bo Phuket Police Station, one of two on Samui."

Are you sure you didn't write this story Big C?

[yorkie100]

Interesting ! But this topic will be shut soon as you cannot link from pw

Really? Unjustifiable censorship if it is.

It is after all a news story about Samui.

Same with bkk post and Andrew Drummond .. Rules are rules

Maybe another paper has the same story ?

So I could copy and paste without giving the source and that would be allowed?

[Boo]

link has been removed as we are not permitted to link that news source.

[yorkie100]

link has been removed as we are not permitted to link that news source.

Fine, no problem, but it would be polite to explain why.

Usually with a post such as this, someone, (a moderator?) would ask for the source to confirm the story had substance. Please explain the difference in this case.

The one line you have left in my original post now makes no sense without further explanation.... and nor does the next post by Big C!

Edited January 9, 2013 by yorkie100

[notmyself]

link has been removed as we are not permitted to link that news source.

Fine, no problem, but it would be polite to explain why.

Usually with a post such as this, someone, (a moderator?) would ask for the source to confirm the story had substance. Please explain the difference in this case.

The one line you have left in my original post now makes no sense without further explanation.... and nor does the next post by Big C!

It's simple really. Thailand is a signatory to DMCA but they may just as well not be because they abuse it all the time. TV could legally use 'fair use' but could end up being done for it anyway. It doesn't make sense but does anything in Thailand?

[Rooo]

Story already running HERE.

As per your question Yorkie:

31) Bangkok Post do not allow quotes from their news articles or other material to appear on Thaivisa.com. Neither do they allow links to their publications. Posts from members containing quotes from or links to Bangkok Post publications will be deleted from the forum. Please note that this is a decision by the Bangkok Post, not by Thaivisa.com and any complaints or other issues concerning this rule should be directed to them. Quotes from and links to Phuketwan are also not allowed and will also be removed. In special cases forum Administrators or the news team may use these sources.