Between Biden and Obama, I think that I would prefer Joe. He may be thick, but at least he is not devious.

Well, I continue to think there's no chance Obama will be impeached, but I really didn't know where to stick this article.

I agree pretty much with what this guy has to say except for his praise for Hannity and Stewart. I don't like either one of them and think they're in the bag for partisan interests.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-cohen/us-militarism-mainstream-media_b_3068969.html

Oh where are the true liberals these days? The gay Jews who stood on principle rather than partisan interest. Oh where, oh where can they be?

. I have often times told my friends from countries with more liberal programs that suffer from a huge man power pool of slackers that the USA has a working form of the dole; the military. The military budget keeps the UAW and Teamsters working, manufacturing producing and jobs growing.

Well, I continue to think there's no chance Obama will be impeached,

Nor this poster either.

Obama made himself 'unimpeachable' by naming that utter fool, Mad Joe Biden, his VP.

He didn't exactly put himself in harm's way with his Attorney General nomination. Erik Holder is useless.

Which brings to mind the following illustration:

Well, Obama certainly isn't competent on the basketball court as evidenced the other day when he made only 2 shots out of >20 attempts, eh?

See where he once told Bryant Gumbel that you can tell something about a man on the basketball court. If they keep shooting when they have no jump shot it means they are delusional.

By His Own Words He Is Delusional Which Certainly Qualifies Him For Immediate Impeachment

Tabloid fodder.

Obama is actually quite good at basketball and plays almost every day. Even pros have bad days shooting and he wasn't in the proper clothes to be playing basketball. It was a non-story but people love to poke fun at the Prez for anything and everything so go ahead I guess.

But it doesn't matter one whit either way, does it?

Just utter nonsense.

He meant when a player keeps shooting in a game situation where missing shots is hurting the team, but I guess you know that, eh?

Deleted by me...too sarcastic.

Going back to the original title of this thread I would lay very good money that the odds for an Obama impeachment are basically slim to none. While that may be disappointing for his detractors they will just have to wait until Jan 2017 to see the back of him.

In the meantime we have the potential dynastic rematch of Bush versus Clinton to look forward to. Personally I would rather see a Bloomberg presidency but that's probably only slightly more likely than Obama facing impeachment....shame.

Going back to the original title of this thread I would lay very good money that the odds for an Obama impeachment are basically slim to none. While that may be disappointing for his detractors they will just have to wait until Jan 2017 to see the back of him.

In the meantime we have the potential dynastic rematch of Bush versus Clinton to look forward to. Personally I would rather see a Bloomberg presidency but that's probably only slightly more likely than Obama facing impeachment....shame.

Bloomberg?

So you're in favor of a Nanny State where it's decided for you how much soda pop you can drink, where street food is even more highly regulated etc. His approach to safety is a bigger danger to the few freedoms that Americans have left...

And here we have Obama admitting he was a Muslim.

http://seattletimes.com/ABPub/zoom/html/2020876675.html

How can the American public swallow any more of his lies?

He really was/is a socialist and he certainly studied Islam as well as having relatives that are Muslim. It is a funny joke, but maybe not so far from reality.

He really was/is a socialist and he certainly studied Islam as well as having relatives that are Muslim. It is a funny joke, but maybe not so far from reality.

Sorry, I don't think it's at all funny.

The shadows, grey areas, hiden parts of the life of a man who has more power than almost any other in this world (CEOs of banks and oil companies excepted) is very worrying. As is the way other leaders of other nations follow his ideas without thinking.

Being humorless is not charming.

And here we have Obama admitting he was a Muslim.

http://seattletimes.com/ABPub/zoom/html/2020876675.html

How can the American public swallow any more of his lies?

And why shouldn't he have been a Muslim?

Because his spiritual mentor is rev JW and a Baptist. I have no hidden agenda I do not like the man and hope that he is disgraced b4 leaving office.

Because his spiritual mentor is rev JW and a Baptist. I have no hidden agenda I do not like the man and hope that he is disgraced b4 leaving office.

Well, he's disgraced now, but that's no criteria for leaving office. If that we're the case the office of the presidency would have a revolving door.

And here we have Obama admitting he was a Muslim.

http://seattletimes.com/ABPub/zoom/html/2020876675.html

How can the American public swallow any more of his lies?

And why shouldn't he have been a Muslim?

Why not? Because one cannot apostasise from Islam without being condemned by fatwa to death.

This is Sharia law and I saw an awful lot of it in Iran when the Shah left. The Bahai were slaughtered in the streets, because their guiding light had been a muslim. He had - 150 years previously - selected what he considered the best bits of several religions and combined them into the Bahai teachings. Because he was an apostate from Islam the populace of Shiraz, where I was living, killed all the Bahai they could find - including the military governor of Fars Province and his entire family - dragged into the streets outside his home and beaten to death by the mob.

Obama claims to be a Christian - this means a public avowal of apostacy. Yet no fatwa. Does this mean he is really the first Muslim President of the US of A? Is there something we don't know? Is this just another lie, another statement that is later to be corrected?

Good point

Sharia law does not apply to Americans. Americans are free to switch to ANY religion, including no religion.

And here we have Obama admitting he was a Muslim.

http://seattletimes.com/ABPub/zoom/html/2020876675.html

How can the American public swallow any more of his lies?

And why shouldn't he have been a Muslim?

Why not? Because one cannot apostasise from Islam without being condemned by fatwa to death.

This is Sharia law and I saw an awful lot of it in Iran when the Shah left. The Bahai were slaughtered in the streets, because their guiding light had been a muslim. He had - 150 years previously - selected what he considered the best bits of several religions and combined them into the Bahai teachings. Because he was an apostate from Islam the populace of Shiraz, where I was living, killed all the Bahai they could find - including the military governor of Fars Province and his entire family - dragged into the streets outside his home and beaten to death by the mob.

Obama claims to be a Christian - this means a public avowal of apostacy. Yet no fatwa. Does this mean he is really the first Muslim President of the US of A? Is there something we don't know? Is this just another lie, another statement that is later to be corrected?

While Obama might have been rash to indulge in that oh-so unAmerican concept known to the rest of the world and even to US citizens with a modicum of brain power as irony, and therefore by making a joke about being a Muslim socialist perhaps it really was a joke.

Of course those with an agenda and without the necessary to identify irony might see it differently. Would it make it better if he was only half black? Gosh he is....

Sharia law does not apply to Americans. Americans are free to switch to ANY religion, including no religion.

Which shows just how much one particular American understands Islam.

Sharia law need not be followed by an apostate - indeed it would not be - but there are enough fundamentalists out there who DO believe in the written word of the Holy Koran and the interpretations made by Quranic scholars to follow any fatwa - talk to Salman Rushdie about that. The fact that no fatwa has been issued could very well mean the Obama is still following the Muslim faith, as do his relatives in Africa, and that this is known to the authorities. He was born of a Muslim father and thus was born a Muslim. This cannot be denied. What American law, or UK law, or any other form of law states is not relevant to Sharia courts.

Folium, I don't think any American president would make a joke these days about being a Muslim.... especially one with so many Muslim connections in his family.

But I would have thought the ayatollahs in Iran would have jumped at the chance of issuing a fatwa against him. After all, Salman Rushdie was a nonentity by comparison.

Maybe Obama will get impeached after all.

At least four career officials at the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency have retained lawyers or are in the process of doing so, as they prepare to provide sensitive information about the Benghazi attacks to Congress, Fox News has learned.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/29/obama-administration-officials-have-threatened-whistle-blowers-on-benghazi/#ixzz2Rway7iNP

Only 4th month of second term plenty of time to impeach

I have been waiting for this subject to come up on World News. Apparently it isn't as important as Dennis Rodman asking for the release of a North Korean political prisoner.

The Benghazi cover-up is soon to become the big elephant in the room for both Obama and Clinton.

State Department personnel who were actually on the ground in Libya during the incident have finally testified before the House Oversight Committee investigating the cover-up.

Here are some links to that hearing:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/us/politics/official-offers-account-from-libya-of-benghazi-attack.html?_r=0

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/breaking-news/2013/may/8/benghazi-breaking-news-congress-set-probe-potentia/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57583388/benghazi-whistleblowers-head-to-house-committee/

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2013/may/07/context-hillary-clintons-what-difference-does-it-m/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/8/white-house-stands-its-benghazi-story-hearing-unfo/

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/08/fourth-benghazi-witness-gagged-by-red-tape/

Some of you can bury your heads in the sand again but I can't believe this is going away any time soon.

Just a political show. The American people care about more important things. They've moved on. Fox News never will. That's what they do.

Just a political show. The American people care about more important things. They've moved on. Fox News never will. That's what they do.

A predictable response, with one rather glaring error.

NONE of my six links were from Fox News.

Here is another NOT Fox News article:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benghazi Bubbling: 25,000 Sign Petition in 24 Hours Demanding Answers

May 7, 2013

By Patrick Goodenough

(CNSNews.com) – As a congressional committee prepares to hear what is expected to be explosive testimony Wednesday from State Department whistleblowers on last September’s attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, a petition demanding that the administration come clean about the incident attracted 25,000 signatures in just 24 hours.

As of early Wednesday morning, the total number of people to have signed the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) petition had passed 70,000.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/benghazi-bubbling-25000-sign-petition-24-hours-demanding-answers

It has becomer glaringly obvious that the Obama administration covered up what happened in Benghazi because of the election and the mainstream media enabled them. Fox News has pretty much been the only major news source doing real coverage on this story and many other stories as well. They have been vindicated now that everybody is finally covering Benghazi and the Gosnell story as they should have been all along.

This is all about damaging Hillary. Its fooling nobody. Hillary remains massively popular and the Fox News groupies will just feel more strongly about not supporting Hillary, which they NEVER would have in the first place!

This is all about damaging Hillary. Its fooling nobody. Hillary remains massively popular and the Fox News groupies will just feel more strongly about not supporting Hillary, which they NEVER would have in the first place!

JT:

Let me get this straight.

Do you honestly believe the Obama administration did everything they could before, during and after the attack on the Benghazi Consulate?

Do you not see something inherently wrong with the Commander in Chief going to his quarters in the White House during the attack and getting a good nights sleep in preparation for a fund raising trip to Las Vegas, while two American diplomatic personnel were likely already dead and two more would be murdered during his absence?

Can you not see through the charade pulled off by the Obama administration in trying to blame a video for the attack rather than calling it a terrorist attack and citing Al Qaeda as the source?

Putting Ambassador Susan Rice on nationwide TV for five talk shows to blame the video and then Obama himself appearing before the UN to make the same claim some one week after the attack does not somehow seem suspicious, in retrospect?

Secreting the estimated 30 survivors of the Benghazi consulate from questioning by either the Congress or the Review Board and not permitting them to have contact with the public until Wednesday last is acceptable in your book?

Hillary Clinton calling in sick rather than meeting with the Oversight Committee might be normal practice for a Democrat but it would seem strange why the media wasn't up in arms about it. They would have been if this was a Republican administration. This somehow doesn't upset you?

Hillary did this to herself. She is the one that failed to provide the Consulate protection required and asked for before the incident and she is the one that was also nowhere to be seen on the evening of September 11, 2012.

In truth, neither of them were capable enough or politically brave enough to answer that famous 3am telephone call.

This whole deal has been a massive cover-up to shift attention from a terrorist action to a simple video that infuriated some Muslims in Cairo and Tripoli. After all, Obama had taken out Bin Laden and called Al Qaeda finished and it was less than two months before his reelection. We couldn't have anything that might upset his apple cart at that point in time, thus the political decision was made at the highest level of the executive branch to pull a Watergate type cover-up and change the subject.

The major difference between Benghazi and Watergate is nobody died in the Watergate incident.

This is all about damaging Hillary. Its fooling nobody. Hillary remains massively popular and the Fox News groupies will just feel more strongly about not supporting Hillary, which they NEVER would have in the first place!

This is about exposing an illegal coverup that it seems that Hillary perpetuated. She damaged herself.