Jump to content

Falling For A Fake


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

PEOPLE IN THE NEWS
Falling for a fake
Pakorn Puengnetr
The Nation

30205372-01_big.jpg

Asst Prof Jessada Denduangboripart gives details about his findings in a recent Kom Chad Luek television interview.

BANGKOK: -- Asst Prof Jessada Denduangboripart, the scientist who proved that the GT200 explosives detector was a fake, looks back on the reasons why Thailand fell for the scam

When leading Thai scientist Asst Prof Jessada Denduangboripart was asked to look into the controversial GT200 explosives detector, which has been ruled fraudulent by a foreign court, he discarded his extensive scientific knowledge in favour of his instincts.

He chose to rely on his scepticism in proving that the expensive device was not scientifically viable for military work, thus preventing further loss of life and a swathe of wrongful prosecutions.

Back in 2009, he met with military units, most of them still convinced that the GT200 was a reliable device that could detect explosives planted in insurgency-infested areas in the deep South, and patiently explained that they would keep dying. The GT200 was a fake, he told them, and innocent people were being subjected to arrest and prosecution because the device had picked up superficial explosive-related stains on their clothes or bodies.

"Back then I wasn't thinking about corruption, or about the military units that bought and used them earning [illicit] profits [from the high unit price]. My only mission was to produce a reliable scientific test that showed GT200 was, as others have put it, am empty plastic case. The military units really believed that the device worked for them, arguing somewhat illogically that having the GT200 was better than not having them, or having nothing at all," says the lecturer at Chulalongkorn University's science faculty who holds a PhD in his field.

A member of community website Pantip.com's Wahko discussion group, where high-tech fans and science buffs debate various subjects, Jessada says that several other people, among them fellow scientists, figured out that the GT200 was a scam early on. That, he stressed, was before the BBC's investigation in 2010, which revealed that the ADE 651 bomb detector used by the Iraqi army and police, among others, was a fake.

"That led to a discussion about the GT200 used by the Thai military, especially in the deep South. The probe started with a basic online research, jointly done by many Wahko group members," he says, adding that several online articles revealed significant irregularities in statements made by the GT200 manufacturer.

"I think the makers of the GT200 would have won a Nobel prize if the device had worked in the way they promised.".

Another motive for Jessada and his fellow academics in leading an official investigation was the lack of interest shown by Thai scientists in producing proof that the device did not work. They could easily have done so, he points out, especially in the wake of the BBC's report that a test conducted in Thailand had clearly revealed the GT200 was a scam.

"The GT200 has been decommissioned in many countries, and investigations into those recommending the purchases are now underway. In Thailand, however, even after the GT200 test was conducted, nothing was done, though the agencies did discontinue its use."

Earlier this month, a British court found wealthy businessman Jim McCormick guilty on three counts of multimillion-pound fraud in relation to the three types of fake bomb detectors he sold to state security agencies across the world - including Thailand. The GT200 were purchased for between Bt800,000 and Bt1 million plus per unit by several government agencies tasked with internal security and narcotics suppression, the UK-based manufacturer Global Technical having also claimed that the device could detect drugs.

"Thailand has learned a major lesson from the GT200 issue, especially as it relates to the purchasing regulations of government agencies. It's vital that the specifications of very expensive devices be verified scientifically, through tests conducted by outside agencies, and not just be approved for purchase on verbal recommendations by the top people in the relevant agencies," Jetsada says.

"To me, the biggest question is why purchases were authorised and made without any tests being conducted. The brochure says the GT200 can detect explosives laid or planted in a radius covering several kilometres and we simply believed the advertising."

"In reality, nothing that can detect explosives better than sniffer dogs though their deployment to Thailand’s south is shunned because of perceived Muslim sensitivities. But even Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia or Kuwait deploy dogs for bombs detecting," he says.

The GT200 made a lot of money for its manufacturer and for McCormick, he notes, because they simply offered "what the buyers wanted.

"In Thailand, which is not renowned for its strength in science and where irrationality is widespread, a ploy like this works. We were open to exploitation because the GT200 answered our dreams."

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-05-05

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a test: Put bits of various explosive ingredients (no, not your mother-in-laws pumpkin pie recipe) in 30 numbered paper bags. Some bags are empty and some contain non-explosive items. Run the tester near them. Write down results. Check bags to gauge device's veracity.

Why this would be tough to do in Thailand:

>>>> Few Thais have scientific training and analytical thinking abilities required.

>>>> Person who placed items in bags can't keep it secret.

>>>> Belief in ghosts is so prevalent among Thais, that if results didn't fit with what they wanted to find, they would attribute it to supernatural.

>>>> Higher ups in the pay-off trough wouldn't want the $30,000 devices to be proven to be hoaxes. They might miss a payment on their Lexus.

Next, try a test with voodoo surgeons in the Philippines.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Falling for a fake is one thing, doing nothing about it is another. The players who were paid off must be very high for there to be no investigation - oh sorry - DSI is busy trying to nail Sukhumband, Abhisit et al, far more important... Meanwhile the NACC is still thinking what to do!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BANGKOK: -- Asst Prof Jessada Denduangboripart, the scientist who proved that the GT200 explosives detector was a fake, looks back on the reasons why Thailand fell for the scam.......

Now, we are going to need 1000 words to say the word corruption.

Nail absolutely smashed on the head. Unfortunately for the gentleman concerned he can hardly claim to have discovered they were fakes as the BBC did it.that long before anyone here knew about. Look at the situation, who was involved, the money both over and under the table and the massive loss of face, little wonder he's jumping through hoops trying to explain it away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow - what stunning insight this man has offered, after the event!

Where was he on day one?

Why did Thai army continue to use the detectors and spokesman say they were fine when the first courts cases kicked off in 2008/9 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Falling For A Fake ?? I Thought this thread was going to be talking about the PM cheesy.gif

I thought it was going to be about ladyboys.
Haha that was my very first thought too... Have I been in Thailand too long???

Ha Ha

TVF, the Hub of wrongly identified threads!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow - what stunning insight this man has offered, after the event!

Where was he on day one?

Why did Thai army continue to use the detectors and spokesman say they were fine when the first courts cases kicked off in 2008/9 ?

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim McCormick received a 10 year sentence on Thursday and will probably be out within 6 years...I wonder how much of the 37 million (pounds) he's stashed and won't be 'seized' NEXT May (2014) !

Edited by metisdead
Bold font removed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all are overlooking the best line of the entire article: "In Thailand, which is not renowned for its strength in science and where irrationality is widespread, a ploy like this works."

Classic!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all are overlooking the best line of the entire article: "In Thailand, which is not renowned for its strength in science and where irrationality is widespread, a ploy like this works."

Classic!

And the most shocking line, about which I dare not comment for fear of being sent 'on holiday':

"nothing that can detect explosives better than sniffer dogs though their deployment to Thailands south is shunned because of perceived Muslim sensitivities."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"In Thailand, which is not renowned for its strength in science and where irrationality is widespread, a ploy like this works. We were open
to exploitation because the GT200 answered our dreams."

Sounds like "whitening cream" to me whistling.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...