Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why so many goals at the World Cup?

000_DV1773075.jpg

PIERRE-PHILLIPPE MARCOU / AFP

After a steadily diminishing goals-per-game ratio at recent World Cups, the 2014 tournament has bucked the trend in spectacular fashion.

A week into the competition, the average number of goals scored per game is just under 2.9, leaving the tournament on course to become the most high-scoring World Cup since the 1958 event in Sweden (3.6).
Here, AFP Sports identifies six factors behind the unexpected goal explosion:
1. The legacy of 'tiki-taka'
- Spain's tournament may have been ended by Chile on Wednesday, but the defending champions' six-year reign as the world's pre-eminent national team has had a profound impact on the way that teams play. The 'tiki-taka' passing style pioneered by Spain and Barcelona has been copied around the world, with proactive, attacking football and aggressive pressing now widespread. The example set by players such as Xavi and Andres Iniesta means that players have become accustomed to taking more risks in possession, which leads to more turnovers, and in turn, more goals.
2. Warm weather
- Compared to the cold weather of South Africa, where the 2010 World Cup took place, games in tropical and sub-tropical Brazil have in the main taken place amid warm conditions. The heat and humidity means that players tire more quickly and when players get tired, they make more mistakes. "Certainly (the conditions) are playing a part," said Australia coach Ange Postecoglou, quoted by the Daily Telegraph. "It's contributed to the openness of the competition, because games get spread in warmer climates. That's why you've seen some pretty open games."
3. Early goals
- It took Brazil defender Marcelo only 11 minutes to put the ball into his own net in the tournament's opening game, the hosts' 3-1 win over Croatia, and early goals have become a recurring theme. There were 25 first-half strikes in the tournament's first 20 matches, and nothing opens a game up like an early goal. Already, seven teams have come from behind to win matches. Only four managed the feat at the 2010 tournament.
4. Innovative tactics
- While the 4-2-3-1 formation was the dominant playing system at the last World Cup, teams have enjoyed success in Brazil with more idiosyncratic tactical configurations. Holland's 5-3-2 system enabled them to crush Spain 5-1 as it gave Louis van Gaal's side numerical parity in midfield whilst allowing forwards Arjen Robben and Robin van Persie to remain high up the pitch. "The fact that our defence plays very deep frees up a lot of space for Robin and me," explains Robben. "We have the whole pitch for leading counter-attacks." After a seemingly ineluctable slide towards single-striker systems in recent years, more and more teams are playing with two central forwards, and more forwards often means more goals.
5. Substandard goalkeeping
- Fans in Brazil have already witnessed some exquisite goals -- Van Persie's looping header against Spain; Tim Cahill's jaw-dropping volley against Holland; Lionel Messi's solo special against Bosnia-Hercegovina -- but standards of goalkeeping have been less impressive. Spain's Iker Casillas made two woeful errors against Holland, while Russia's Igor Akinfeev and Mathew Ryan of Australia have also committed high-profile blunders. Several leading nations have problems in the goalkeeping department -- Brazil's Julio Cesar and Argentina's Sergio Romero are both short of match practice, while Italy's Gianluigi Buffon missed his side's opening game through injury -- so it could prove a tournament to forget for the men between the posts.
6. The snowball effect
- The early-tournament goal spree is encouraging teams to throw caution to the wind, creating a climate where risk-taking is applauded and defensive play derided. "I'm surprised how open it's been," admits England striker Daniel Sturridge. "It's been quite open and, for the neutrals, it's a great World Cup to see, with so many goals and chances. I'm enjoying it, enjoying the occasion -- watching games as well as playing."
afplogo.jpg
-- (c) Copyright AFP 2014-06-20
Posted

To that, you can add the fact that the ball they are playing with is heavier-than-air, unlike the wretched Jabulani which needed no encouragement whatever to fly out of the stadium.

Plus, the pitches in Brazil are much lusher and softer than they were in South Africa, which stops the ball ping-ponging around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...