Jump to content

NCPO urged to go ahead with Somsak, Nikom cases


Recommended Posts

Posted

IMPEACHMENT
NCPO urged to go ahead with Somsak, Nikom cases

Pimnara Pradubwit,
Olan Lertrudtanadumrongkul
The Nation

Experts say NLA empowered by interim charter to follow up on impeachment

BANGKOK: -- Legal experts called on the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) yesterday to impeach the former president of Parliament and his then deputy.


Democrat deputy spokesman and lawyer Rames Rattanachaweng voiced concerns over the issue and urged the NCPO to take action.

"I am concerned about the impeachment case because it poses a big problem. Owing to uncertainty in the law, the NCPO has still not been able to take any action and now the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) has been scrutinising the [impeachment] case and there is still no solution to it," Rames said.

Last week, the NLA deferred its decision on whether to consider the impeachment of former Parliament president Somsak Kiatsuranon and his then-deputy Nikom Wairat-panich for allegedly violating the charter in connection to amending the composition of the Senate.

Political observers are concerned that the NLA's decision on the impeachment case would set a standard and affect other cases as well, such as the one against former premier Yingluck Shinawatra in relation to the graft-ridden rice-pledging scheme.

Rames also said he was determined to gather information in relation to the impeachment of other top politicians, in addition to Somsak and Nikom, adding that they reserved the right to defend themselves according to law. But he said it would be a waste if wrongdoers could get away due to legal loopholes.

Some observers have been saying that Somsak and Nikom's cases should be dropped to promote reconciliation, but Rames said that reconciliation did not mean making compromises and letting wrongdoers get away.

"How can politicians be allowed to violate the law? We all come under the same law, and these politicians can crucially damage the country," Rames said.

He said if he was taken on as a legal adviser to the NCPO, he would suggest that it use its authority to amend the provisional charter and give the NLA full authority to impeach politicians for wrongdoing.

Former Democrat spokesman Warong Dejkitvikrom, meanwhile, said he did not believe the impeachment of Somsak and Nikom would affect other cases, specifically the one against Yingluck.

'Clarity necessary'

"The NLA should be clear on these cases, especially since it is empowered to do so under the [interim] charter. However, holding closed-door meetings will only make people question the NLA's transparency," Warong warned.

He went on to say that since the NLA was working "as the Senate as stated by the interim charter, it needed to be clear on its authority. Holding closed-door meetings will also make people question the NCPO."

Warong said Yingluck's case, filed by the National Anti-Corruption Commission for negligence of duty in regard to the rice-pledging scheme, would be easier to scrutinise and pursue because it comes under the Anti Corruption Act, not just the defunct 2007 charter.

Meanwhile, Pheu Thai deputy secretary-general Chawalit Wichaya-sut called on government agencies and politicians to scrutinise the cases without personal prejudice.

"I do not defend the wrongdoers or advocate reconciling with them. If they are proved to be guilty, their cases should be judged under the law and not be based on political disagreements or personal prejudice," he said.

Chawalit also called on PM Prayut Chan-o-cha and related agencies to resolve the dispute and scrutinise the case thoroughly.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/NCPO-urged-to-go-ahead-with-Somsak-Nikom-cases-30245908.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-10-21

  • Like 2
Posted

Political observers are concerned that the NLA's decision on the impeachment case would set a standard and affect other cases as well, such as the one against former premier Yingluck Shinawatra in relation to the graft-ridden rice-pledging scheme.

The good thing about the NCPO still having 'ultimate power' over EVERYTHING is that there is no need for loopholes. Obviously if they have forgotten to plug a few holes in the charter. They can over-ride anything as a special circumstances case. Which won't necessarily set a precedent.

However, should the NCPO ignore this and leave a loophole for all these scoundrels to wriggle through, then as far as I am concerned, this has been deliberately done as part of 'a deal'.

Or maybe Chalerm was right, and Prayuth is shitting himself that he will be assassinated if he dares touch anyone from the Thaksin camp.

So come on NCPO.... you really mean what you say or is it 'business as usual at the trough'? With the next fat greedy pigs ready to line up in Jan 2016??

  • Like 2
Posted

Some observers have been saying that Somsak and Nikom's cases should be dropped to promote reconciliation, but Rames said that reconciliation did not mean making compromises and letting wrongdoers get away.

Take a wild guess as to who the "some observers" are, Thaksin supporters is mine. The thing is, the rich don't really want change, a lot of old money may not like the new money, but because they are all rich they don't want to see anyone go to jail. If it can happen to Thaksin and company, it just might happen to them....and that would never do.

  • Like 1
Posted

Some observers have been saying that Somsak and Nikom's cases should be dropped to promote reconciliation, but Rames said that reconciliation did not mean making compromises and letting wrongdoers get away.

Take a wild guess as to who the "some observers" are, Thaksin supporters is mine. The thing is, the rich don't really want change, a lot of old money may not like the new money, but because they are all rich they don't want to see anyone go to jail. If it can happen to Thaksin and company, it just might happen to them....and that would never do.

Which therein lies one of the biggest issues. The very fact that someone like TS was sentenced to 2 years in jail in a country like Thailand, just goes to show how political the hole thing is, and why its so difficult to swallow the hole Shin witch hunt, when there are endless corrupt people around, but no one blinks an eye at them.

I dont think people would have any issue with the Shins being prosecuted for their wrong doings, if others were also prosecuted, but it simply is not happening.

  • Like 1
Posted

"How can politicians be allowed to violate the law? We all come under the same law, and these politicians can crucially damage the country," Rames said.

What hypocrisy.

Rames is okay with

1) the abolishment of the 2007 Constitution

2) the denial of human rights defined by that Constitution

3) the denial of freedom of speech defined by that Constitution

4) the lack of any say or participation of the Thai electorate in the creation of an Interim Constitution, a new government, and new Constitution

5) suspension of open and free elections

6) the absolute power of the Junta as a substitution for the rule of law

7) martial law that supercedes all civil and criminal organic laws, including the right to appeal

Surely no damage there to the country.

  • Like 1
Posted

Closed-shop meetings, legal loopholes, concerning corruption, and uncertain laws needing clarification to prosecute rich law breakers? blink.png

Surely, this couldn't happen in Thailand - the centre of the universe? facepalm.gif

Thais just wouldn't do this. They don't wear bikinis - rolleyes.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...