Are Older Men in Thailand Trading Love for Financial Ruin

[webfact]

Syria's warring sides face off as U.N. tells them: end the nightmare

By Tom Miles and John Irish

REUTERS

 

United Nations mediator for Syria Staffan de Mistura attends a news conference outside the United Nations office during the Geneva IV conference on Syria in Geneva, Switzerland, February 23, 2017. REUTERS/Pierre Albouy

 

GENEVA (Reuters) - Opposing sides in the Syrian war came face-to-face in U.N. peace talks for the first time in three years on Thursday, to hear mediator Staffan de Mistura implore them to cooperate to find a way out of almost six years of war.

 

"I ask you to work together. I know it's not going to be easy to end this horrible conflict and lay the foundation for a country at peace with itself, sovereign and unified," Mistura told the delegates sitting opposite each other on the stage of the U.N. assembly hall in Geneva.

 

Mistura will hold meetings with the delegations on Friday to establish a procedure for the talks, he told reporters after the opening session, adding it would be his "dream" to bring them back together for direct talks, but there was work to be done before that could happen.

 

At the last Geneva talks, 10 months ago, de Mistura had to shuttle between the parties who never met in the same room.

 

De Mistura told the representatives of President Bashar al-Assad's government and his opponents that they had a joint responsibility to end a conflict that had killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions.

 

"The Syrian people desperately all want an end to this conflict and you all know it," he said.

 

"You are the first ones to tell us it. They are waiting for a relief from their own suffering and dream of a new road out of this nightmare to a new and normal future in dignity."

 

Describing the negotiations as an uphill task, he said they would centre on U.N. Security Council resolution 2254 which calls for a new constitution, U.N.-supervised elections and transparent and accountable governance.

 

He said a shaky ceasefire brokered by Russia, Turkey and Iran had opened a window of opportunity.

 

"The effort has jump-started the process ... to see if there is a political road forward and we don't want to miss this opportunity."

 

Neither delegation clapped the speech by de Mistura, who went to shake hands with both sides after his opening remarks. Even as he warmly embraced the opposition delegates, the government group were walking out of the room and did not turn back.

 

"We need direct talks to create empathy and trust in both sides. We still don't know if it will be direct or proximity talks, but the government has given no indication it wants to talk directly which inevitably shows how little they are committed to this process," a Western diplomat said.

 

TRANSITION

 

The ceasefire - which excludes hardline jihadists such as Islamic State - was implemented after separate talks in Kazakhstan's capital Astana, brokered by Russia, Turkey and Iran.

 

But fighting continued even as the peace talks resumed, with Syrian jets bombing rebel-held areas of Aleppo, Deraa and Hama provinces and insurgents firing rockets at government targets.

 

The lead negotiator for the opposition - which is still fractured and does not have a completely unified delegation - said the Geneva talks should prioritise finding a political transition, something he said Assad's side did not want.

 

"If Staffan is serious he has to stick to the first subject in the agenda which is a political transition that is acceptable to the Syrian people," Nasr al-Hariri told reporters.

 

But Russia's envoy to the United Nations in Geneva, Alexei Borodavkin, said demands from rebels and their Western and Arab backers for Assad to step down were "absurd".

 

Hariri criticised the role played by Iran and Iranian-backed militias, which - with Russia - are vital Assad allies.

 

"Iran is the main obstacle to any kind of political deal," Hariri said, accusing Tehran of being responsible for violations of the ceasefire.

A Gulf Arab diplomat said of the talks: "I'm not optimistic."

 

De Mistura said the biggest challenge was lack of trust.

 

"We do know what will happen if we fail once again - more deaths more suffering, more terrorism, more refugees."

 

(Additional reporting by Stephanie Nebehay, Laila Bassam, Yara Abi Nader and Kinda Makieh in Damascus; Writing by Robin Pomeroy; Editing by Alison Williams)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-02-24

[craigt3365]

Quote

Hariri criticised the role played by Iran and Iranian-backed militias, which - with Russia - are vital Assad allies.

 

"Iran is the main obstacle to any kind of political deal," Hariri said, accusing Tehran of being responsible for violations of the ceasefire.

A Gulf Arab diplomat said of the talks: "I'm not optimistic."

How about the foreign powers leave Syria and let the Syrian people deal with this on their own.

[hawker9000]

Syria is merely the place where one tip of the spear currently meets the other.  It's an Islamic issue, the whole world knows it, and THAT'S what's going to have to be brought out into the open, acknowledged, and dealt with before there's ever going to be any peace.  And the UN is never going to be part of the solution.

[elgordo38]

Hang Assad in public like he did with 13,000 of his countrymen problem solved. 

[Morch]

11 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

How about the foreign powers leave Syria and let the Syrian people deal with this on their own.

Doubt that would happen. Russia and Iran did not put in all that effort pro bono.

 

But on the other hand, how would Syrian people (or rather...which Syrian people) deal with this "on their own"? Even if there was no foreign involvement of any kind, it is still doubtful that some sort of common ground would be found, or that the conflict would be decided in favor of whichever side.

 

Withdrawal of all foreign presence and international interests might result in ongoing low intensity conflict, and possibly the de facto dismantling of Syria into several smaller fiefdoms, with various factions carving out their respective turfs. The chances of this spelling peace or not promoting further instances of foreign involvement are slim.

[craigt3365]

11 hours ago, Morch said:

Doubt that would happen. Russia and Iran did not put in all that effort pro bono.

 

But on the other hand, how would Syrian people (or rather...which Syrian people) deal with this "on their own"? Even if there was no foreign involvement of any kind, it is still doubtful that some sort of common ground would be found, or that the conflict would be decided in favor of whichever side.

 

Withdrawal of all foreign presence and international interests might result in ongoing low intensity conflict, and possibly the de facto dismantling of Syria into several smaller fiefdoms, with various factions carving out their respective turfs. The chances of this spelling peace or not promoting further instances of foreign involvement are slim.

Right.  Syria is in a tough situation.  Hundreds of thousands would not have died if foreign powers were not helping.  And millions would not have fled to surrounding countries and Europe also.  Not a great situation, but better than what has happened.  IMHO.  Tough times for the average Syrian.