Jump to content

Army defends 15-million-baht toilets and stores at Rajabhakti Park


webfact

Recommended Posts

Army defends 15-million-baht toilets and stores at Rajabhakti Park

By Thai PBS

 

rajabhakti.jpg

 

The army chief has defended the 15-million baht plus spending for the construction of toilets and stores at the Rajabhakti Park in Prachuap Khiri Khan’s Hua Hin district as justified, appropriate and transparent.

 

“What is wrong with construction of toilets?” asked Gen Chalermchai Sitthisad, army commander-in-chief and chairman of Rajabhakti Park Foundation in response to a reporter’s question about criticisms in the social media against the 15-million baht plus spending.

 

Meanwhile, army spokesman Col Winthai Suvaree said that, in the past, there was not a toilet at the park which is frequently visited by both Thai and foreign tourists.

 

Full story: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/army-defends-15-million-baht-toilets-stores-rajabhakti-park/

 
thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2017-10-20

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webfact said:

“What is wrong with construction of toilets?”

Ah, the old answering a question with question. But I believe he asked the wrong question - it should have been, "What's wrong with spending 15 million on toilets and stores?".

 

But I guess he knows what he's doing. You'd think this place might steer clear of anymore negative attention after what happened before and what it represents. Zero shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A standard toilet install should take between one and two hours to complete and cost an average of $348 or less. Basic installs will run around $115. Unexpected costs could raise the cost up to as much as $800https://www.homeadvisor.com/cost/plumbing/install-a-toilet/  

 

$500,000 / $800 = 625 installed toilets. 

 

Sure they are including plumbing and buildings, but even at that, the price tag is way too high.  Somebody must be getting a BMW for Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toilets the latest scandal to plague royal Rajabhakti Park

By The Nation

 

48a1269bf4033ea29930a3a908c92739.jpeg

Army spokesperson Colonel Winthai Suvaree

 

The Army on Thursday defended construction of a Bt15-billion restrooms and shops in the royal Rajabhakti Park, claiming that it is worth the investment and the process was sufficiently transparent to stand up to close scrutiny.


“They won’t be typical toilets you can see everywhere,” said Army spokesperson Colonel Winthai Suvaree. “We believe that our donators wish everything in the park to be magnificently built, to be worthy of royalty.”

 

The facility will also be essential for welcoming thousands of visitors coming to the Prachuap Khiri Khan-based park each day, Winthai said.

 

The procurement process also followed a high standard and is transparent, he assured.

 

The Army Chief General Chalrmchai Sittisart asked: “How can it be wrong to build toilets and shops?”

 

Last December, the Army hired a private company to construct a building consisting of 52 restrooms, and five rooms for shops.

 

Now 80 per cent completed, the project is expected to be open next February.

 

The construction is subsidized by the Rajabhakti Park Foundation under Royal Patronage of HRH Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, according to the name registered in January last year.

 

When opened in 2015, the park itself faced controversy for alleged irregularities in construction budgets. Seven statutes of historical Thai Kings are the park’s key feature, and the budget for each king’s statue was set at Bt50 million, while the foundry said that a statue was actually worth Bt1 million.

 

Decorative palm trees were also set budgeted at Bt100,00 each. The palm breeder later revealed that the trees were actually donated.

 

The National Anti-Corruption Commission concluded that the royal project correctly followed all regulations in its September 2016 decision.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30329699

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-10-20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rkidlad said:

Ah, the old answering a question with question. But I believe he asked the wrong question - it should have been, "What's wrong with spending 15 million on toilets and stores?".

 

But I guess he knows what he's doing. You'd think this place might steer clear of anymore negative attention after what happened before and what it represents. Zero shame. 

You are right! And we all know quality comes with a price tag. It will turn out to be the No.1 attraction on zero dollar tours.

Quality%20has%20its%20price_zpsxiiuqso0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Bt15 mil to friend to build. Friend builds for Bt3 mil although the 'bill' will be for Bt15 mil. Profits are shared.

Call me a synic :wink:.

You got it 'Right'..............  Sounds like you (as most of us) 'Know' this country well..... and the 'Press' dare not expose them, either........       

And I might add...... The past 'flood/drainage' jobs fit the same scenario........... LOL........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, webfact said:

Last December, the Army hired a private company to construct a building consisting of 52 restrooms, and five rooms for shops.

I just wonder if the owner of the company was 'transparent as well and what his relationship (as in relative/family) to the leaders of the project.........

Sounds like the cost of the statues and donated palm trees already prove something......                                                                                                                                     

Edited to add more below........

 When opened in 2015, the park itself faced controversy for alleged irregularities in construction budgets. Seven statutes of historical Thai Kings are the park’s key feature, and the budget for each king’s statue was set at Bt50 million, while the foundry said that a statue was actually worth Bt1 million.

 

Decorative palm trees were also set budgeted at Bt100,00 each. The palm breeder later revealed that the trees were actually donated.

 

And to add.............  

The National Anti-Corruption Commission concluded that the royal project correctly followed all regulations in its September 2016 decision.  

(That decision was obviously made for a split of the 'Profits')                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last December, the Army hired a private company to construct a building consisting of 52 restrooms, and five rooms for shops.


Fifty-two restrooms! And I assume each restroom has more than one toilet. How big is this park?
 
Decorative palm trees were also set budgeted at Bt100,00 each.


Is that 100,000 baht or 10,000 with a misplaced comma?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, attrayant said:

Is that 100,000 baht or 10,000 with a misplaced comma?

Thought they were donated but charged fuel costs for the transportation of the trees from Pattaya to the park in Hua Hin and wages for workers for the landscaping totaling about four million baht.

http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/over-1000-trees-donated-to-rajabhakti-park-by-suan-nongnuj-in-pattaya/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the procurement process in selecting the supplier, purchasing direct materials and contract placement strictly followed the prescribed public sector procurement rules. And that the on-going contract management, including vetting and authorizing of all payments, for materials, labor etc followed the same prescribed rules :whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one of the most environmentally inappropriate and wasteful uses of the land possible. Basically all that is there is one massive paved parking lot and lots and lots of  grass devoid of any appropriate vegetation and no trees of any sort. The native vegetation was removed. In the afternoon, large amounts of scarce water is used to  water the grass. They don't want people  sitting on the grass or using it. Basically, you are to go before the large idols/statues and show deference much as North Koreans do before there similar structures. This place is wrong in just so many ways.

 

They could have accomplished  their goal of creating monuments had they applied responsible land management principles and respected the local environment. Other countries are able to build monuments and integrate them  into a natural setting. Even the Chinese are  trying.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, geriatrickid said:

This place is wrong in just so many ways.

A wring compounded by five shops (food & souvenirs?) - reminds me of the commercialization of the "Silver" Temple in Chiang Mai except that was built on private property I believe.

 

According to the Thai environmental laws, shouldn't development of public property (assuming military lands are public property which is not necessarily true) be first reviewed by an environmental impact review? As you point out there's potential negative environmental impact of this project and even on the surrounding area (new traffic patterns, more traffic congestion, garbage and sewage, rainfall flooding & soil erosion, security, etc.). I don't recall any such review or even an invitation for public comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...