Popular Post webfact Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Senior army man denies trying to murder "pretties" in their car Picture: Daily News A senior military man presented himself at the Bang Kruay police yesterday. The sergeant major denied that he shot two "pretties" in their Yaris. He claims he sold the gun used in the attack to a friend a long time ago. The development followed a story that Manasvee Singkorn and her friend had been driving on the Bang Kruay to Sai Noi Road in the early hours of Sunday morning when a person in a black pick-up fired seven shots at them. They provided police with a bullet that was lodged in their Toyota Yaris car. There were suggestions that they had been targeted in a road rage incident after using a high beam - something the driver denied saying they were the victims of a misunderstanding. Yesterday a military judge advocate took Sgt Maj 1st Class Nathee Charoenphaet, 59, to the police. He was subjected to a thirty minute grilling before being handed back to the advocate and ushered away. He refused to speak to reporters - Daily News described him as ashen faced. He has been charged with attempted murder, having a weapon in the city, firing in the city and having an illegal weapon. He denied everything saying he sold the gun used in the attack to a friend a long time ago. CCTV evidence showed a man in black at a Khao Tom restaurant near the scene of the attack getting into a black pick-up at 3.13 am on the morning of the attack, said Daily News. There have been claims made elsewhere in the Thai media - and on the Facebook page of Manasvee - that the army man will try to use his influence to escape responsibility. Thaivisa notes that the term "pretty" is a noun in Thailand denoting a lady who works as a hostess or sales representative promoting products. It does not necessarily relate to the physical appearance of the female. Source: Daily News -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-10-17 Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info Pictures: Amarin TV 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post colinneil Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Liar, liar pants on fire. 27 2 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MaxLee Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Oh, he's from the army,.... well I guess he can bribe his way out sooner or later with brown envelopes.... 19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dmaxdan Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 10 minutes ago, webfact said: There have been claims made elsewhere in the Thai media - and on the Facebook page of Manasvee - that the army man will try to use his influence to escape responsibility. No, surely not... 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Creasy Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Must be his stunt double on the cctv. 2 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Isaanbiker Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 (edited) 21 minutes ago, colinneil said: Liar, liar pants on fire. Liar, liar, no more Panties on fire. Edited October 17, 2019 by Isaanbiker 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post agudbuk Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 So did he name his friend? 13 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rkidlad Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 18 minutes ago, webfact said: The sergeant major denied that he shot two "pretties" in their Yaris 19 minutes ago, webfact said: He claims he sold the gun used in the attack to a friend a long time ago. 19 minutes ago, webfact said: There were suggestions that they had been targeted in a road rage incident after using a high beam - something the driver denied saying they were the victims of a misunderstanding A very poorly written and confusing article. Whether they were using their full beams or not, what does it matter? You don't go around shooting at people. This is a complete non-issue. 7 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NanLaew Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 12 minutes ago, agudbuk said: So did he name his friend? "Even if he did it wouldn't matter as the 'friend' probably died a while back." Watchman Defense 101 8 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post z42 Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Call me cynical but i predict he'll get off scot free and also get a promotion before these 2 unfortunate victims get any closure or financial compensation they are due Great disclaimer in the OP also haha 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post thequietman Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Can't believe he didn't say that he sold it to a 'dead friend.' Has worked before. ???? 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chang_paarp Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Tomorrow there will be a follow up article with pictures of everybody smiling and wai-ing complete with a basket of goodies saying it was all a misunderstanding. 4 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Matzzon Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, webfact said: He claims he sold the gun used in the attack to a friend a long time ago. And as an army guy, he do not realize the importance of changing the owner name on the weapon. I guess he had the best instructor in the world, or that he´s just thick as a brick. Another assumption would of course be, that the man might be telling some lies. 7 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Phuketshrew Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 44 minutes ago, thequietman said: Can't believe he didn't say that he sold it to a 'dead friend.' Has worked before. Maybe he swapped it for a watch? 1 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RichardColeman Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 hours ago, webfact said: He claims he sold the gun used in the attack to a friend a long time ago. .......who just happens to resemble him more than his twin ! What are the odds ? 3 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercman24 Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 anyone can see that is not him, whats up with you all, ME? i am off to SPECSAVERS he he, what a lying bar steward, and they have <deleted> like him in high ranks.lucky no one killed, like that poor young lad a few days ago . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post scorecard Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 hours ago, MaxLee said: Oh, he's from the army,.... well I guess he can bribe his way out sooner or later with brown envelopes.... And/or he believes that because he's army he's entitled to behave any way he wants and non-army underling folks should respect his superior open-ended entitlement without question. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedk Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 So did he name his friend?Probably the same one that lent out his watches to another friend.Sent from my SM-C710F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Denim Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 hours ago, webfact said: Senior army man Sergeant major ? Just when I was getting excited the facts burst my bubble. 4 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post seajae Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 well if he fired several shots and only hit the car once he has to be either army or police, they are the really bad shots 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denim Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 hours ago, webfact said: Thaivisa notes that the term "pretty" is a noun in Thailand denoting a lady who works as a hostess or sales representative promoting products. It does not necessarily relate to the physical appearance of the female. Oh yes, you can be a butt ugly female and still get loads of work in this field. ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailand Noobie Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 hours ago, MaxLee said: Oh, he's from the army,.... well I guess he can bribe his way out sooner or later with brown envelopes.... No, envelope need to have Hello Kittys on it, not brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yinn Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, thequietman said: Can't believe he didn't say that he sold it to a 'dead friend.' Has worked before. ???? That will be next. The “watch” friend only die after media want to ask him about the watch. Then he dead. First story, a friend. Second story, dead friend. Dead not speak. 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post LivinLOS Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 The article (purposefully) avoids important details like was he in the driver of the pickup on the supplied video evidence, was he at the scene, etc.. The ownership of the gun is made a big point, while so much other evidence would appear to place him as the shooter anyway. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Colabamumbai Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 Thai Thai deny deny. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worgeordie Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 3 hours ago, webfact said: saying he sold the gun used in the attack to a friend a long time ago. Who looks just like him. " that the army man will try to use his influence to escape responsibility.", what a surprise. regards worgeordie 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chang1 Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 If the gun has not been found and examined, how does he know it is the shooters gun that he sold to a friend? 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JonnyF Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 52 minutes ago, seajae said: well if he fired several shots and only hit the car once he has to be either army or police, they are the really bad shots Give him a break, it's not easy to drive fast and shoot accurately after 7 beers and 15 whiskeys. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post British Bulldog Posted October 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2019 I can't believe that an Army officer sold 'a' gun to a 'friend', presumably it was an Army issued gun ? ... and he just reported it missing ? That in itself should a 'charge' even in Thailand shouldn't it ? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helloagain Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 4 hours ago, colinneil said: Liar, liar pants on fire. If him he must have gun powder on his hand or arm, clothes or car. Forensics?????? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now