Jump to content

Army chief warns to look out for ‘proxy crisis’


webfact

Recommended Posts

General Apirat is absolutely mental, a complete idiot. He sees the bogeyman (Mr T...?) everywhere. The poor chap must often wake up screaming at night that the communists are out to get him. I feel sorry for his wife. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FarFlungFalang said:

Is there a race to show who has the least amount of intelligence and integrity among the those at the top of the military or is that part of the selection process?

The most backwards chap gets extra medals. Ohhhhh shiny things!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TooBigToFit said:

The Army and rest of the military are there to protect the nation from foreign invaders yet Apirat and many general like him approve of taking over the Thai government continually. They are the ones with the continual crisis. They are the ones who constantly are proven to use lies to abuse the nation. He's a pathetic man for a 'general'.

In Asian countries for the past 40 years, armies are not used to protect their respective nations (with the exception of some disputes over border markers) from foreign invaders.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, TooBigToFit said:

The Army and rest of the military are there to protect the nation from foreign invaders yet Apirat and many general like him approve of taking over the Thai government continually. They are the ones with the continual crisis. They are the ones who constantly are proven to use lies to abuse the nation. He's a pathetic man for a 'general'.

In a "Real Army", he would be a Major or Lieutenant Colonel at best and would respect not meddling in civilian government affairs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apirat Kongsompong is the same stubborn stone head like his father - except possibly the "mia noi" issue. He has not understood his particular position on the organization chart called "Thailand". 

Apirat Kongsompong is EXECUTIVE, i.e. he executes orders he gets from the government. The government is also EXECUTIVE as the latter gets its orders from the voters. 

That, at least, how "democracy" works on the rest of planet Earth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 10:08 AM, Proboscis said:

In Asian countries for the past 40 years, armies are not used to protect their respective nations (with the exception of some disputes over border markers) from foreign invaders.

Tell that to the North Vietnamese.

 

Since the end of WW2 they have been invaded by the French, the USA and the Chinese. They are still there and still in charge of Vietnam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Tell that to the North Vietnamese.

 

Since the end of WW2 they have been invaded by the French, the USA and the Chinese. They are still there and still in charge of Vietnam.

There has been no more "North Vietnam" since April 30, 1975.

In addition, France did not "invade" Vietnam after the 2nd world war but about one hundred years ago;
the French Indochine exists (existed) since October 17, 1887 ...

As for the Chinese, it has been more than two thousand years that they try to invade Vietnam without ever getting there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sydebolle said:

Apirat Kongsompong is the same stubborn stone head like his father - except possibly the "mia noi" issue. He has not understood his particular position on the organization chart called "Thailand". 

Apirat Kongsompong is EXECUTIVE, i.e. he executes orders he gets from the government. The government is also EXECUTIVE as the latter gets its orders from the voters. 

That, at least, how "democracy" works on the rest of planet Earth! 

Seems to me he recognizes / executes what he wants to recognize / execute and not much more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Assurancetourix said:

There has been no more "North Vietnam" since April 30, 1975.

In addition, France did not "invade" Vietnam after the 2nd world war but about one hundred years ago;
the French Indochine exists (existed) since October 17, 1887 ...

As for the Chinese, it has been more than two thousand years that they try to invade Vietnam without ever getting there.

Absolutely correct up to a point. Your post made me look it up and check if I was right. I wasn't totally.

 

I did forget that Japan took over French IndoChina to give its proper name in 1942 to 1945 ( it was run by Vichy France until March 1945) and when the allies won WW2 the French got it back only to lose it all again.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Indochina#World_War_II

 

After the war, 200,000 Chinese troops under General Lu Han sent by Chiang Kai-shek invaded northern Indochina north of the 16th parallel to accept the surrender of Japanese occupying forces, and remained there until 1946.[10] The Chinese used the VNQDĐ, the Vietnamese branch of the Chinese Kuomintang, to increase their influence in Indochina and put pressure on their opponents.[11]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam#Reunification_and_reforms

 

In 1978, responding to the Khmer Rouge government of Cambodia, who had been invading and massacring Vietnamese residents in the border villages in the districts of An Giang and Kiên Giang,[144] the Vietnamese military invaded Cambodia and removed them from power after occupying Phnom Penh.[145] The intervention was a success, resulting in the establishment of a new pro-Vietnam socialist government, the People's Republic of Kampuchea, which ruled until 1989.[146] This action, however, worsened relations with China, which had supported the Khmer Rouge. China later launched a brief incursion into northern Vietnam in 1979, causing Vietnam to rely even more heavily on Soviet economic and military aid, while mistrust towards the Chinese government began to escalate.[147]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...