Jump to content

Australian, American among four charged for ‘Abandoned Phuket Zoo’ post


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, tifino said:

at least this 'unwanted' attention would now ensure the animals get to eat tonight

Good idea. I'm sure the tigers will love to meet them in person. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Canuck1966 said:

And people wonder why nobody dares talk about the fictitious Chinese flu figures!

China Virus , you mean 

Posted

Many family charity businesses operating in  the US. The first things will be paid for are leased luxury company cars, high salary of those who run the business, mortgage of office properties and many more other expenses related to the charity or covered up under charity's name. All paid by donations. 

  • Like 2
Posted
52 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

yes, she may have given permission AFTER the video came out.

 

from first video at 01:38

 

"...so we moved along, and we're walking cautiously cause umm, we weren't sure who was there or whether we were allowed to be there.  there was no sign saying we weren't allowed to be there, so...."

She clearly stated that she gave permission on the first trip in as the group heard a tiger crying out. Come up with facts instead of making up stuff.

Posted
4 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Yeah, didn't seem to be entering anywhere without permission.

Zoo staff seemed happy enough they were there.

The animals enjoyed the food.

 

Where's the harm?

The harm is someone lose face as his zoo cannot afford to even feed its animals.

  • Confused 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Wildliferescue said:

She clearly stated that she gave permission on the first trip in as the group heard a tiger crying out. Come up with facts instead of making up stuff.

you are welcome to watch minh nguyen's video, listen to his own words as he describes the first two illegal visits to the zoo.

 

then you may apologize for accusing me of "making up stuff."  i shall forgive you in advance.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Logosone said:

You're wrong, as post 55 above clearly shows.

 

They regularly fed the animals, with consent of the zoo keepers whom they contacted. This was about animal welfare.

 

There is no evidence of any misappropriation of funds.

 

In this case yes, the small offence of trespass was justified because it exposed widespread neglect of animals and improved the situation of the animals concerned.

 

Moreover the fact that the authorities are helping to feed the animals shows that the owner was unable to do so.

 

ok.  so the first two visits were indeed trespassing.  thank you.

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, irwinfc said:

despicable. but why exclude Thais from the headline? why not "Foreigners and locals charged for Abandoned Phuket Zoo post"?

Come on mate...  you know why. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, drgoon said:

Most of the comments I see on this topic are the usual dip<deleted> haters who sound as though they have no better thing in their pitiful lives than to spout the usual negative <deleted> over and over. You guys should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

The little that can be seen of the inside of the enclosures and the physical appearance of that tiger is appalling. That place is a disgrace as are a number of 'zoos' in Thailand.

 

I think these people are genuine in the concern for the animals in this zoo. It looks like they have more concern than the owner in their mansion.

 

If I get censured or banned by the mods for this post...  good bloody job. TV News is turning into a whinge fest. There are very good parts to TV but this part....  pfft

You literally just whinged about whingers. 

Welcome to irony. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, hansgruber said:

You literally just whinged about whingers. 

Welcome to irony. 

Well there you go..  you just confirmed it about yourself

Posted

Who appointed these people to collect donation for the animals? Obviously, most of the donations will go to them instead of the animals.

 

People should donate directly to the zoo instead of scammers like these.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ChouDoufu said:

you are welcome to watch minh nguyen's video, listen to his own words as he describes the first two illegal visits to the zoo.

 

then you may apologize for accusing me of "making up stuff."  i shall forgive you in advance.

You are welcome to ignore facts and believe what you want with no facts.

 

I also, do not wish to waste my time so am also welcome to ignore you.

  • Like 1
Posted

i've not read the full details, but some predictions: -

 

2 non-Thais will be deported after paying a bailout, blacklisted for 10 years

2 Thais = jailterm or wai500

Zoo owner told to use donation money to take care of animals

Zoo still closes, most of the animals die, owner retires

Summary - Covid-19 to blame

Posted

Story was completely different from the national news sources.  Or the people that broke the story.  Looks like damage control and strings being pulled now to make the good sameritans into the evil empire.

Richard Barrow has all the original stories and links if interested in seeing the original story.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...