Jump to content

UK COVID-19 death toll tops 47,000 as pressure heaps on PM Johnson


Recommended Posts

Posted

UK COVID-19 death toll tops 47,000 as pressure heaps on PM Johnson

By Andy Bruce

 

dghrt.PNG

FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson holds a daily news conference with Public Health England's (PHE) Medical Director Yvonne Doyle (not pictured), on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain May 25, 2020. Andrew Parsons/10 Downing Street/Handout via REUTERS

 

LONDON (Reuters) - The United Kingdom’s COVID-19 death toll surpassed 47,000 on Tuesday, a dire human cost that could define the premiership of Boris Johnson.

 

The Office for National Statistics said 42,173 people had died in England and Wales with suspected COVID-19 as of May 15, bringing the UK total to 47,343 - which includes earlier data from Scotland, Northern Ireland, plus recent hospital deaths in England.

 

A death toll of nearly 50,000 underlined Britain’s status as one of the worst-hit countries in a pandemic that has killed at least 345,400 worldwide.

 

Johnson, already under fire for his handling of the pandemic, has had to defend his top adviser Dominic Cummings who drove 250 miles from London to access childcare when Britons were being told to stay at home to fight COVID-19.

 

One Johnson’s junior ministers, Douglas Ross, resigned on Tuesday in protest. Johnson has stood by Cummings, saying the aide had followed the “instincts of every father”.

 

The government says that while it may have made some mistakes it is grappling with the biggest public health crisis since the 1918 influenza outbreak and that it has ensured the health service was not overwhelmed.

 

Unlike the daily death toll published by the government, Tuesday’s figures include suspected cases and confirmed cases of COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus.

But even these figures underestimate the true number of deaths.

 

In March, Britain’s chief scientific adviser said keeping deaths below 20,000 would be a “good outcome”. In April, Reuters reported the government’s worst-case scenario was 50,000 deaths.

 

Disease experts are watching the total number of deaths that exceed the usual for amount for the time of year, an approach that is internationally comparable.

 

The early signs suggest Britain is faring badly here too.

 

Excess deaths are now approaching 60,000 across the UK, ONS statistician Nick Stripe said, citing the latest data - a toll equivalent to the populations of historic cities like Canterbury and Hereford.

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-05-26
 
  • Haha 1
Posted

I am seeing 37,000 as a total. Is this number correct? UK, is already number two. But that is an extraordinary number. Of course nowhere near the crazy US numbers. But, they are the world leaders!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

I am seeing 37,000 as a total. Is this number correct? UK, is already number two. But that is an extraordinary number. Of course nowhere near the crazy US numbers. But, they are the world leaders!

Singapore is the worst affected country in the world on a per capita basis. It doesn't surprise me having lived there for 15 years. It success relies on vast army of migrant workers. Poorly paid living in cramped quarters. 

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, gamini said:

Singapore is the worst affected country in the world on a per capita basis. It doesn't surprise me having lived there for 15 years. It success relies on vast army of migrant workers. Poorly paid living in cramped quarters. 

San Marino and Qatar far worse than Singapore. Indeed even Spain is worse.

 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Posted
38 minutes ago, Jonnapat said:

Johnson dithered, probably being advised by Cummings until too late.

Exactly the same outcome as the USA. 

Many deaths could have been avoided by the swift action taken by many other countries,  particularly those with female leaders as figures now prove.

Shame on both Johnson and Trump. Both countries deserve better leadership. 

You think it's a coincidence that two countries where people are seen actively protesting for freedom of rights and less government 'controls' have a higher death rate

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, gamini said:

Singapore is the worst affected country in the world on a per capita basis. It doesn't surprise me having lived there for 15 years. It success relies on vast army of migrant workers. Poorly paid living in cramped quarters. 

Again a Brit, who cannot read nor calculate: Singapore: 23 deaths tested + confirmed with 32.343 confirmed infected and 16.444 recovered of the virus with over million inhabitants... https://www.bing.com/search?q=corona+deaths+Singapore&cvid=09d5c338aecd4d73b0381896e46696a5&FORM=ANSPA1&PC=U531

UK: 37.048 tested + confirmed deaths and 265.227 confirmed infected and ZERO recovered with 67,85 mln inh. 

Atleast something you British are the best of the world...

 
Edited by puipuitom
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, puipuitom said:

Nr 3 = Brazil.  Same moron al government leader.


You think it is coincidence that two countries where people are seen actively protesting for freedom of rights and less government 'controls' have a higher death rate?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, sawadee1947 said:

The British got what they were voting for 

A clown, a loser, a liar, not capable to manage a severe crisis, apparently not the brightest candle on the cake. 

Good Luck Little Britain. ????

 

Yes, because the French President, Russian President/PM, Chinese President for Life, the Italian PM, the Brazilian President have all done sooooooo much better.

Posted
1 minute ago, Baerboxer said:

Yes, because the French President, Russian President/PM, Chinese President for Life, the Italian PM, the Brazilian President have all done sooooooo much better.

 

Yep, its laughable how people who hate a certain group of politicians are so eager to hang anything they can around their necks even if it involves putting horse-blinders on and ignoring how most other countries are fairing. Its a global pandemic, not every country is as transparent as western nations when it comes to testing and releasing data for the public etc... 


Seems sometimes that western nations pay a certain price for testing and accounting for the virus. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Jonnapat said:

Johnson dithered, probably being advised by Cummings until too late.

Exactly the same outcome as the USA. 

Many deaths could have been avoided by the swift action taken by many other countries,  particularly those with female leaders as figures now prove.

Shame on both Johnson and Trump. Both countries deserve better leadership. 

Johnson should have followed the examples set by Taiwan, South Korea and Japan - no lockdowns and all under control.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 hours ago, sawadee1947 said:

The British got what they were voting for 

A clown, a loser, a liar, not capable to manage a severe crisis, apparently not the brightest candle on the cake. 

Good Luck Little Britain. ????

May I correct you, it's Great Britain or United Kingdom, your "Little Britain is a TV program.

 

As for having a pop at Boris, well he has got us out of the disastrous EU thing, which all thought would be a problem.

Do you come from that disastrous EU thingy.....?  ????

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...