Jump to content

Citing COVID-19, Australia seeks to bar George Floyd protests


Recommended Posts

Posted

Citing COVID-19, Australia seeks to bar George Floyd protests

By Colin Packham and Byron Kaye

 

2020-06-05T033522Z_2_LYNXMPEG54048_RTROPTP_4_AUSTRALIA-NEWZEALAND.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison speaks during a joint press conference held with New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern at Admiralty House in Sydney, Australia, February 28, 2020. REUTERS/Loren Elliott

 

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australian authorities moved on Friday to scupper protests inspired by the death of black American man George Floyd, saying large gatherings risk new coronavirus infections and banning the biggest rally planned for Sydney.

 

Around 50,000 Australians had been expected at nationwide events on Saturday as anger over Floyd's death in Minneapolis - where a white policeman knelt on his neck - also focuses attention on mistreatment of indigenous Australians.

 

Health Minister Greg Hunt said people had the right to express themselves, but should the COVID-19 disease spread at protests, it would be impossible to trace all participants.

 

"Any mass gathering at this time is a lottery with peoples' lives," he told reporters in Melbourne.

 

Authorities in Australia's most populous state of New South Wales (NSW) secured a Supreme Court injunction to prevent the largest rally planned for Sydney.

 

Judge Desmond Fagan said a gathering of thousands was "an unreasonable proposition" given state directives for no more than 10 people to gather.

 

"It is self-evident that the social distancing measures ... have been the key element in minimising the spread of this disease," he said, adding that the right to free expression was being "deferred" until a safer time.

 

Some protesters, however, said they would carry on.

 

"I never lose my decision to fight for what is true," rally organiser Raul Bassi said after the court decision.

 

Australia has avoided the high infections and casualties of other nations, with only 102 deaths, because of border closures and social distancing since March.

 

NSW police had originally approved the Sydney protest, on the understanding there would be fewer than 500 participants, but far more had been planning to attend.

 

"The New South Wales government would never, ever give the green light to thousands of people flagrantly disregarding the health orders," NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian told reporters.

 

In Victoria state, where gatherings of more than 20 people are banned, police threatened fines for protest organisers and people breaking social distancing rules. Queensland and Western Australia states also urged people not to attend rallies.

 

"Let's find a better way and another way to express these sentiments," urged Prime Minister Scott Morrison.

 

"Let's exercise our liberties responsibly."

 

(Reporting by Colin Packham and Byron Kaye; Editing by Shri Navaratnam, Jane Wardell and Andrew Cawthorne)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-06-06
 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Don Mega said:

So they are protesting because they are bored ?

I think being bored is one reason, probably feel strongly too, but now have free time to join in. More protests in London and cities in the UK over the weekend. I might go and have a look in London, buy a 4 pack of beer and see what happens.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Pity the NZ government wouldn't uphold their own rules and let the <deleted> mingle without ( apparently ) the cops even trying to enforce the law on the Auckland march. Good on Oz for banning it.

Edited by thaibeachlovers
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I hope the cops arrest them then, and they get a criminal record.

It one Sydney  NSW protest which has been banned.

Regional and other cities have attempted to have social distancing marshals in place, in some places police are marching with the protesters (Byron Bay)

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Don Mega said:

Why are aussies protesting because of the death of a black man in the USA ?

Linked to Aboriginal deaths in custody

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Don Mega said:

Right, so the death of a black American man is the trigger point for Australians to protest about 432 aboriginals dying in custody over the past 20 years.

And the protests in every other corner of the western world are because? Because they can, because they want to, because they're bored too. Least Aussies have got some skin in the game......you obviously have NFBI about the situation on the ground or history behind it, and I'm not about to waste any more of my time to try and enlighten you!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

It one Sydney  NSW protest which has been banned.

Regional and other cities have attempted to have social distancing marshals in place, in some places police are marching with the protesters (Byron Bay)

Hope the cops are enforcing social distancing then.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

So it took a man dying in a far away country for Australians to protest about Aborigine deaths? I think not.

 

Have a march for Aborigines then, not some man with no connection to Oz.

Exactly, the American death whilst sad should not be the trigger point in Aus.

 

Sounds like my fellow Aussies are just using it as an excuse for the sake of protesting.

blacklines.jpg.d64c4ee455ed9aad7319af3de4c6f644.jpg

 

Edited by Don Mega
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...