Sunday’s local elections a ‘proxy war’ between national parties

[rooster59]

Sunday’s local elections a ‘proxy war’ between national parties

By Thai PBS World Syndicate

 

 

Voters around Thailand go to the polls this coming Sunday (December 20) to elect chiefs and other members of provincial administrative organisations (PAOs).

 

 

The first local elections since 2012 come after political activities were suspended following the May 2014 military coup.

 

Chiefs and other members of PAOs who completed their four-year terms while the post-coup junta was in power had their tenures extended, unless they were suspended on corruption or other charges.

 

All 76 provinces go to the polls on Sunday, excluding Bangkok. A total of 331 candidates will vie for 76 PAO chief’s seats, while 8,070 candidates will contest for PAO member seats, which range from 24 to 48 per province depending on population size.

 

As usual, candidates from locally influential political families are expected to secure their seats easily – though some will face a fresh challenge.

 

Incumbents challenged

 

 

Local political clans have long dominated provincial politics, thanks mainly to their strong connections with national parties and the powers-that-be.

 

However, several of their incumbents are facing a serious challenge from candidates affiliated with the Progressive Movement – a popular political group led by tycoon-turned-politician Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit.

 

The Progressive Movement is making its debut in local politics, fielding candidates for PAO chief in 42 provinces.

 

The political group is aiming to repeat the success of Thanathorn’s Future Forward Party, which came third in last year’s general election, winning 81 of the 500 MP seats in its first campaign for office.

 

Analysts say the Progressive Movement, relying on Thanathorn’s popularity, has livened up the PAO elections. And Thanathorn is betting on young voters to build a strong support base for his political future.

 

Stithorn Thananithichot, director of the Innovation for Democracy Office at King Prajadhipok’s Institute, said the Progressive Movement is catching voters’ attention with its rousing campaign call to “stand up and change your province”.

 

However, the deciding factor in PAO elections is still the existing support base, he added. “Candidates with a strong network of local support have a better chance of winning,” he said.

 

Thanathorn and other ex-Future Forward executives formed the Progressive Movement after the party was dissolved by a court ruling in February for violating funding rules. The former party executive members were also banned from politics for 10 years – during which they are not allowed to register, set up, help found or be executives of any political party.

 

Hence, Thanathorn and his allies have opted to campaign for election candidates affiliated with the Progressive Movement.

However, on the campaign trail they have faced protests from local royalist groups, who have branded the movement enemies of the monarchy.

 

Thanathorn and other key Progressive Movement leaders, namely Piyabutr Saengkanokkul and Pannika Wanich, are accused of pulling the strings of young anti-establishment protesters who are calling for reform of the monarchy.

 

Another headache emerged for Thanathorn in the run-up to the PAO polls when his younger brother Sakulthorn was linked to a corruption case, in which a Crown Property Bureau official was found guilty of accepting Bt20 million in bribes.

 

Fierce fights

 

Certain provinces are experiencing exceptionally fierce election battles. In a “clash of the titans” underway in Chiang Mai, the Shinawatra family is throwing its support behind a challenger to the incumbent PAO chief.

 

Fugitive former premier Thaksin Shinawatra posted a handwritten message on Facebook to Chiang Mai residents, asking them to vote for his preferred candidate, Pichai Lertpong-adisorn. Thaksin said he had “been abandoned by some politicians” – which observers said was a veiled reference directed at Chiang Mai’s incumbent PAO chief, Boonlert Buranupakorn.

 

The letter was signed by Thaksin and his sister, fellow ex-PM Yingluck, both of whom hail from the northern city. Pichai has also reportedly won a stamp of approval from Yaowapa Wongsawat, also Thaksin’s sister.

 

Pichai’s campaigning team boasts senior figures from Thaksin’s proxy Pheu Thai Party, including Chalerm Yoobamrung and Yaowapa’s husband and ex-PM Somchai Wongsawat.

 

Pichai is among Pheu Thai candidates for the PAO chief’s post in 25 provinces.

 

Boonlert has been accused of betraying his long-held ties with the Shinawatras and defecting to the ruling Palang Pracharath Party.

 

The allegations have been dismissed by Pheu Thai politician and red-shirt leader Jatuporn Prompan, who is aiding Boonlert’s campaign for re-election in Chiang Mai.

 

Jatuporn also accused an unnamed “Big Sister” of “messing up Chiang Mai in the same way she did with the governments of Thaksin and Yingluck”.

 

Some analysts view Thaksin’s rare plea to Chiang Mai voters as a sign that Pheu Thai is at a serious disadvantage in the local polls.

 

“There are signs that Pheu Thai candidates are behind their rivals from the government camp. Thaksin had to write a letter to ask for votes in Chiang Mai. That is a sign of political decline,” said political scientist Olarn Thinbangtieo from Burapha University.

 

Not so independent

 

Officially, the core coalition Palang Pracharath Party is not fielding any candidates. However, many local politicians are contesting the PAO polls under newly-formed groups with names containing the word “Pracharath”. Analysts say this signals a link with the ruling party.

 

Among other major coalition parties, Bhumjaithai is not officially fielding any candidates while the Democrats have candidates in two southern provinces – Songkhla and Satun.

 

Although the 331 candidates in the PAO chief elections are contesting as independents, more than two-thirds are linked to either a coalition or opposition party, according to research company Rocket Media Lab.

 

The PAOs have been allocated a combined budget of Bt91 billion in fiscal 2021, or 2.8 per cent of the total Bt3.2 trillion national budget.

 

PAO chiefs are executives responsible for preparing local development plans and annual spending. PAO members act more like the legislature, issuing local regulations, approving development and budget plans, and scrutinising the local administrators.

 

Thanks to their power over the lives of local residents, PAO chiefs and members serve as a link to large support bases for national politicians.

 

The nationwide PAO elections are also big test of popularity before the next general election. Results involving candidates linked to political parties or groups are seen as an indication of their performance in the next parliamentary elections.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30399877

 

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-12-20

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

[hotchilli]

6 hours ago, rooster59 said:

 

As usual, candidates from locally influential political families are expected to secure their seats easily

 

[Burma Bill]

6 hours ago, rooster59 said:

As usual, candidates from locally influential political families are expected to secure their seats easily

From my experience when living in Thailand, about 300 baht per voter!!!

[Bangyai]

21 hours ago, rooster59 said:

The political group is aiming to repeat the success of Thanathorn’s Future Forward Party,

 

But with less scrutiny on this election than a general election , many Progressive Movement votes will be disallowed for one reason or another and burnt with the trash.

 

The local Progressive Movement candidate is the only one who has not been around our area every day with loudspeakers blaring out to drum up votes. The others , if elected will have a lot more money to recoup to retrieve their campaign expenses. Not a good start.

[Scott Tracy]

The wife was offered 100 by one party, 200 by the other one standing in the local elections. She is up 300 baht. She voted this morning. No idea which of the 2 people got her vote....

[bodga]

Its NOT a  proxy war its a  BIDDING war

[bodga]

45 minutes ago, Scott Tracy said:

The wife was offered 100 by one party, 200 by the other one standing in the local elections. She is up 300 baht. She voted this morning. No idea which of the 2 people got her vote....

"none of the above"

[TigerandDog]

2 hours ago, Burma Bill said:

From my experience when living in Thailand, about 300 baht per voter!!!

Have to agree with that. Already in our village offers of 500 baht each in exchange for ID card numbers have been made from one political party. The younger eligible voters have declined this corruption, but unfortunately hte older villagers have all jumped at the opportunity to receive 500 baht.

[herfiehandbag]

No doubt, at some time in the days (weeks or months!) to come, once the appropriate bodies have scrutinised, adjudicated, interpreted and where necessary adjusted the votes, the results will demonstrate solid support for the incumbent Government.

 

Expect a General to be trotted out in due course to make the announcement.

Edited December 21, 2020 by herfiehandbag

[polpott]

20 hours ago, Bangyai said:

 

But with less scrutiny on this election than a general election , many Progressive Movement votes will be disallowed for one reason or another and burnt with the trash.

 

The local Progressive Movement candidate is the only one who has not been around our area every day with loudspeakers blaring out to drum up votes. The others , if elected will have a lot more money to recoup to retrieve their campaign expenses. Not a good start.

On Pattaya Darkside, the only canvassing we saw was an old farang leafletting our moo bahn on behalf of the Progressive Movement. Wife and all her friends voted for him.

[herfiehandbag]

10 minutes ago, polpott said:

On Pattaya Darkside, the only canvassing we saw was an old farang leafletting our moo bahn on behalf of the Progressive Movement. Wife and all her friends voted for him.

Well I wouldn't shout about it! An old farang - proof, were it needed (admittedly they don't really bother with proof in such matters) that there has been blatant foreign meddling in the election, and all "Progressive Movement" candidates should be disbarred immediately.