Jump to content

Assault on Kiev: Russian helicopters swoop above Ukraine's capital


Chris.B

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Saanim said:
 

 

The shooting happened at a Ukrainian checkpoint  well within a swath of territory that remains within the lines controlled by Ukrainian forces.

The New York Times confirmed that the incident occurred at a Ukrainian checkpoint.
“Capt. Oleksandr Bogai, the deputy chief of police in Irpin, said Mr. Renaud was shot in the head when Russian forces fired at his car, which was being driven by a local civilian across a Ukrainian checkpoint near the northern border of Irpin.”
This again establishes that Renaud had been moving through Ukrainian, not Russian checkpoints.

It's quite possible, Brent Renaud was killed by Ukrainian forces. And instead of taking responsibility for the tragic shooting, the Ukrainians used Renaud’s death as an instrument to advance a propaganda campaign against their enemy.

 

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, lexor said:

The shooting happened at a Ukrainian checkpoint  well within a swath of territory that remains within the lines controlled by Ukrainian forces.

The New York Times confirmed that the incident occurred at a Ukrainian checkpoint.
“Capt. Oleksandr Bogai, the deputy chief of police in Irpin, said Mr. Renaud was shot in the head when Russian forces fired at his car, which was being driven by a local civilian across a Ukrainian checkpoint near the northern border of Irpin.”
This again establishes that Renaud had been moving through Ukrainian, not Russian checkpoints.

It's quite possible, Brent Renaud was killed by Ukrainian forces. And instead of taking responsibility for the tragic shooting, the Ukrainians used Renaud’s death as an instrument to advance a propaganda campaign against their enemy.

 

The Kemlin would be proud of stating your possibilities. I hear they are very good at spewing out a few of their own.

Edited by Bkk Brian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, lexor said:

The shooting happened at a Ukrainian checkpoint  well within a swath of territory that remains within the lines controlled by Ukrainian forces.

The New York Times confirmed that the incident occurred at a Ukrainian checkpoint.
“Capt. Oleksandr Bogai, the deputy chief of police in Irpin, said Mr. Renaud was shot in the head when Russian forces fired at his car, which was being driven by a local civilian across a Ukrainian checkpoint near the northern border of Irpin.”
This again establishes that Renaud had been moving through Ukrainian, not Russian checkpoints.

It's quite possible, Brent Renaud was killed by Ukrainian forces. And instead of taking responsibility for the tragic shooting, the Ukrainians used Renaud’s death as an instrument to advance a propaganda campaign against their enemy.

 

Considering that have bombed hospitals, kindergartens, have hostages in basements as human shields, and theatres with the word children written in white outside it, nothing would surprise me

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saanim said:
 
Quote

'We had crossed the first bridge in Irpin. We were going to film other refugees leaving we got into a car. Somebody offered to take us to the other bridge.

1 hour ago, Saanim said:

 We crossed a checkpoint and they started shooting at us. The driver turned around, there were two of us. My friend is Brent Renaud. He has been shot and left behind. I saw

You are mis-understanding the 2nd written broad script.

Russian sniper shot him I would say. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Saanim said:

Actually, in his country there are not cases of such a way of removing a sitting president (as it had happened elsewhere...)  

There is a saying in English: “there is a first for everything”. So because something hasn’t happened so far doesn’t automatically mean it will never happen. Like I said, one can always hope…..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that there are almost no independent reporters there. The OSCE monitoring was ordered in the first days of the war to leave the country in their powerful white SUV's, after they publicized their finding:

 

KYIV 21 February 2022

Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30 20 February 2022. All times are in Eastern European Time.

Summary

  • In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 18 and 20 February, the SMM recorded 2,158 ceasefire violations, including 1,100 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 591 ceasefire violations in the region.
  • In Luhansk region, between the evenings of 18 and 20 February, the Mission recorded 1,073 ceasefire violations, including 926 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 975 ceasefire violations in the region.

 https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512683

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Saanim said:

The problem is that there are almost no independent reporters there. The OSCE monitoring was ordered in the first days of the war to leave the country in their powerful white SUV's, after they publicized their finding:

 

KYIV 21 February 2022

Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30 20 February 2022. All times are in Eastern European Time.

Summary

  • In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 18 and 20 February, the SMM recorded 2,158 ceasefire violations, including 1,100 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 591 ceasefire violations in the region.
  • In Luhansk region, between the evenings of 18 and 20 February, the Mission recorded 1,073 ceasefire violations, including 926 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 975 ceasefire violations in the region.

 https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512683

 

 

Yes its a shame as they provided some excellent reporting and factual evidence that countered the Russian propoganda:

 

"With the SMM’s indefinite departure, Ukrainian diplomats and Western leaders lose an important resource to counter the false narratives that the Kremlin uses to justify Russia’s aggressive campaign against Ukraine and mischaracterize the activities of its forces."

https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-temporary-evacuation-osce-ukraine

 

However no problem a far more reaching investigation is now ongoing directly from The International War Crimes Tribunal who are in Ukraine now:

 

ICC prosecutor: Team leaves to investigate war crimes in Ukraine

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr Derek said:

 

What ever a democratically elected government dose within its own borders is really up to them and the majority of its people however thin skinned your psychopathic dictator next door neighbor quoting history is as simple  as that????

Edited by onthedarkside
quote of hidden post removed
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

What ever a democratically elected government dose within its own borders is really up to them and the majority of its people however thin skinned your psychopathic dictator next door neighbor quoting history is as simple  as that????

So killing civilians in escape refugees convoys is acting in good faith?

keeping hostages in hospital basements is good faith>?

bombing theatres sheltering children is in good faith?

Russia and good faith is an oxymoron

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris.B said:

Most civilians, in a war zone, do not have a choice of being there. 

 

Not sure what that has to do with the legal status of a journalist? Just because he knows there are risks they are still afforded the rights of a civilian. There are also millions of civilians in Ukraine who are there willingly and know the risks.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Not sure what you're on about here - most countries have laws that allow the seizure of an individual's assets when that country's authorities consider it appropriate. 

 

In the US for instance they have the Magnitsky Act, passed in 2016, which applies globally and authorizes the U.S. government to sanction individuals, freeze their assets, and ban them from entering the US.

 

The EU no doubt has similar laws.

If you go back to the original post I've been responding to, the poster claimed that doing business in Russia was risky because there is no rule of law and they're confiscating airliners.

 

Here, you're claiming that there are laws that allow it. 

 

I'm just saying you can't have it both ways.  If you're going to confiscate Russian assets, don't complain if they confiscate western assets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

he was wearing his out dated NYT press card but "Time Magazine" confirmed he was in fact working for them on assignment covering the refugee crisis.

Obviously "Time Magazine" (?) has not had any batch spare, so he better put on a NYT batch where he hadn't had any business over 7 years with? 

 

Renaud had been a regular contributor to the New York Times. Clifford Levy, deputy managing editor at the Times, tweeted that Renaud last worked for the newspaper in 2015. 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-13/u-s-journalist-killed-in-ukraine-in-shooting-near-kyiv

 

 

Clifford Levy, a deputy managing editor of the New York Times, issued a statement on Twitter clarifying that Renaud was not on assignment for the paper, contrary to earlier reports.

“[The New York Times] is deeply saddened to learn of the death of an American journalist in Ukraine, Brent Renaud. Brent was a talented photographer and film-maker, but he was not on assignment for the New York Times in Ukraine. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/13/brent-renaud-us-film-maker-killed-by-russian-forces-ukraine

 

Edited by metisdead
Edited as per fair use policy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

I just posted a link to the same video in my previous post to you and additionally a week ago on this thread. Again I ask you of your claim.

 

"his death seems to be by a friendly shot"

 

Where in that video backs up such a claim? You are spreading fake and false propaganda

you have to be fair, for him "friendly shot" probably means shot by a Russian.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Saanim said:

Obviously "Time Magazine" (?) has not had any batch spare, so he better put on a NYT batch where he hadn't had any business over 7 years with? 

 

Renaud had been a regular contributor to the New York Times. Clifford Levy, deputy managing editor at the Times, tweeted that Renaud last worked for the newspaper in 2015. 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-13/u-s-journalist-killed-in-ukraine-in-shooting-near-kyiv

 

 

Clifford Levy, a deputy managing editor of the New York Times, issued a statement on Twitter clarifying that Renaud was not on assignment for the paper, contrary to earlier reports.

“[The New York Times] is deeply saddened to learn of the death of an American journalist in Ukraine, Brent Renaud. Brent was a talented photographer and film-maker, but he was not on assignment for the New York Times in Ukraine. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/13/brent-renaud-us-film-maker-killed-by-russian-forces-ukraine

 

aah, I understand, it's not as bad to shoot journalists who aren't working for the NYT.

 

I can see the Russian palkovnik shouting orders "only shoot at freelance journalists !!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, tgw said:

you have to be fair, for him "friendly shot" probably means shot by a Russian.

In a letter to the Reuters news agency, Israel's top military lawyer, Brigadier General Avihai Mendelblit, said the troops involved in the shooting in April could not tell whether cameraman Fadel Shana, 24, was holding a camera or a weapon but nonetheless reached a "reasonable conclusion" that he was "hostile".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

Considering that have bombed hospitals, kindergartens, have hostages in basements as human shields, and theatres with the word children written in white outside it, nothing would surprise me

It couldn't be made more clear, could it?

 

I cannot get how the Russian generals wage the war: (that's why so many generals be killed)

 

they have hostages in basement of theater?  does it mean they bring thousands of the hostages into basement? - where from? 

 

Then, they (the Russians) leave and call an airplane to bomb the roof where is the word children written in white? Instead of killing them by an explosion inside... 

 

Unfortunately, no record of a plane around in that time... (but perhaps out of order...)  

 

But why they do not kill the 3+ millions along the humanitarian corridors? Seems that the generals are not so clever...  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...