Jump to content

For many, Thailand’s UN vote on Russia still a puzzle


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, gsohman said:

Historically Switzerland has been the world haven as a politically natural and has hence been available to opposing sides in any conflict as an impartially and unbiased country to which peaceful ideas and solutions can safely be negotiated and agreed.

For many years, historically, Switzerland was known for its warriors mercenaries. Wiki said its zenith was reached in 15-16 century. When technical progress in warfare made single man negligible, the stopped this practice. Peaceful, they are only last 150 years. But I still remember ... ????

Posted
1 hour ago, crazykopite said:

Those who side with Russia should have sanctions imposed on them and I include Thailand 

Yep the home countries should ban their citizens to get retirement extensions ????

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, 2baht said:

Fence sitters!

Indeed! Despicable <deleted> from Thailand:

 

"In explaining Thailand’s stand on the latest vote, Suriya Chindawongse, Thailand’s Permanent Representative to UN, said in a statement that Thailand chose to abstain because the vote “takes place during an extremely volatile and emotionally charged atmosphere and situation, and thus marginalizes the chance for crisis diplomacy to bring about a peaceful and practical negotiated resolution to the conflict that may push the world towards the brink of nuclear war and global economic collapse.”

 

But not surprising....

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Is Suriya Chindawongse, Thailand’s Permanent Representative to UN actually suggesting FM Don has the negotiating skill, influence, and leverage to put forward a diplomatic solution to this crisis, and influence Vlad?

 

Or is this simply cleverly camouflaged double speak intended to look like they are not simply caving into Russia and China? 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, plus7 said:

Yes, because it is hard to find it on "unbiased western media"

Do you have any claims that those videos are fake ?

 

Actually, the same statement was found on the "western media" - if Amnesty International is considered as "western media"...

 

But sometimes obviously not.  I just mentioned that it was recently publicised by them and now I no longer see it here. Are the AI now illegal? 

 

The AI are functioning under wings of UN, with Dr. Agnes Callamard  as their Secretary General, she being a long time working for UN human rights departments.   

Posted
49 minutes ago, perryjr2 said:

Thailand realizes how the U.S. & NATO have pushed Russia and none of this would have happened had the west simply negotiated peacefully. This was something the Biden Administration would not support because they support the sale of weapons and bombs to it's NATO customer as well as possibly adding a new NATO client Ukraine who would also need to be sold and armed to meet the minimum specs for membership. No one is fooled it's all for profit not for people. The west could care less about it's people or they would insist on peaceful negotiation.

<deleted>

Posted
5 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Jeez, the world must be full of thick politicians or ignorant ones that cannot see what every single foreigner living here can see - It's about tourism and money - not about having good moral standards or supporting Russia ! If Russia has been say Peru invading Brazil, they would be condemning it to the roof tops

Except the stupidity remains; Russia ,from a thailand tourist perspective is pretty much dead for the foreseeable future. Putin has ensured Russia is economically severely damaged for the longer term so there really will not be Russians going on holiday in any numbers to anywhere,particularly relative to the Western nations whose stance by Thailand has been noted. No,they have simply aligned themselves with China,their ultimate masters 

  • Like 1
Posted

Whats the puzzle? 

 

Dictators usually don't criticize fellow dictators as that easily hits own foot later.  And if they do, it will be more subtle and diplomatic, kind of like expressing their own idea of dictatorship rather than condemning. Having Thailand condemning Russia would have been surprising actually.

 

Public explanation of why not to condemn is ridiculous of course.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Thailand/Siam has endeavoured to remain neutral throughout most of it's history. However, It did side with the Axis powers in WW2 (at the point of a gun), and took on the French at a time when they were annexing Thai territory. It is also facing an ongoing insurgency in the south. Apart from those  instances Thailand has kept well away from international disputes, rightly so in my opinion. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I can agree that the world is changing, but IMO the winner won't be the greedy, decadent, soft, bogged down in stupidities west.

If, as you believe, Thailand is choosing a side, IMO they are choosing the winning side.

Since when has abstaining amounted to choosing a side? I wonder if the other 42 countries that abstained would accept they were, in reality, voting for "the winning side". If the winning side is made up of those that voted against, then I think they will be busy in the next transfer market. Kim Wrong'un in goal? Lukashenko up front? Assad midfield? Trouble is, with only 5 players, they might find themselves a bit stretched. A complete bunch of tossers.

 

Walk on, walk on...

 

Edited by bradiston
Posted

A number of off topic deflection posts and replies have been removed.  Please remember this topic is about:

 

For many, Thailand’s UN vote on Russia still a puzzle

Posted
6 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Since when has abstaining amounted to choosing a side?

 

There have been so many conflicts in the world, some very serious ones even in Thailand's  neighbourhood. I guess that nobody was ever outraged by Thailand's side taking or not taking. 

 

Perhaps there were some (outraged). But it would  be well off-topic, won't it be?   

Posted
1 hour ago, connda said:

The "We hate Russia and Russians" crowd is now becoming the "We hate Thailand and Thais" crowd.

If you don't like Thailand's Geo-political neutrality - pack up and leave.
Go back to your Western utopias which now have massive energy, food, and inflation problems directly related to attempting to 'punish Russia' with sanctions. 

Personally I commend Thailand for their neutral stance.  Stay neutral and maintain trade alliances.  Win-Win. 

Thomas Jefferson sums it up, "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none."

Amen.

Such a stupid post.

 

SCENARIO: China align with Russia and take the actions as their chance to annex Taiwan, the world becomes more involved.  China decide to continue their invasions of South East Asian countries, firstly Philippines and eventually Thailand.

QUESTION: Which way will Thailand vote in the UN resolution in this scenario?

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I can agree that the world is changing, but IMO the winner won't be the greedy, decadent, soft, bogged down in stupidities west.

If, as you believe, Thailand is choosing a side, IMO they are choosing the winning side.

I agree with the gist of your post. But every now and then, the US does something right. Last Friday, the Biden administration imposed wide ranging chip export restrictions on China, especially concerning design tools. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/12/us-chip-export-restrictions-could-hobble-chinas-semiconductor-goals.html  It's far more ranging and effective than Trump's tepid showroom tariffs or controls on things like Huawei. And God help Thailand if it tries to take advantage and serve as a false front for Chinese firms trying to import technology through Thailand.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Untrue. See Seri Thai, the Free Thai Movement.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Thai_Movement

 

Japan overran the whole of South East Asia, including Taiwan. Anyone heard of Pearl Harbour?

Seri Thai did not begin to have the effectiveness of the Viet Minh or MPAJA. Read up on those movements. By the way, it's spelled Pearl Harbor, not Pearl Harbour.

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, John Drake said:

By the end of WW II, the Japanese were afraid to venture outside the major population centers in Indochina, because of the Viet Minh. In Malaya, the MPAJA made life absolutely miserable for the Japanese from 1942 until the end. There was nothing comparable in Thailand. Nothing.

That's 1 opinion ... 

You may want to enlighten yourself:

https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/the-free-thai-movement-and-the-soe/

 

Have a nice day

Edited by KhunLA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...