Jeremy Clarkson says he is 'horrified' over Meghan column

[xtrnuno41]

1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

He didn't exactly say that , what he said was :  

"Elsewhere in the article, Clarkson compared his hatred of Meghan with that of Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

He said: "Meghan, though, is a different story. I hate her. Not like I hate Nicola Sturgeon or Rose West. I hate her on a cellular level."

 

   I am not too sure what cellular level means myself

The hating from Jeremy is compared and on cellular level that would be much worse. If he was allowed to shoot one of them, he would shoot Meghan. So, odd to let a murderer get away to kill a non murderer. But ok his ego is out of control.

[JonnyF]

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

As you choosing to see mockery proves. 

I am not choosing to see it. ????

 

It is what is there staring me in the face. Pretty much everyone who is honest enough to admit it, can see it. Only those who gaslight or have a major problem interpreting human interaction can't see it. It's like seeing someone laugh and swearing blind they are crying, you are fooling nobody ????.

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

I am not choosing to see it. ????

 

It is what is there staring me in the face. Pretty much everyone who is honest enough to admit it, can see it. Only those who gaslight or have a major problem interpreting human interaction can't see it. It's like seeing someone laugh and swearing blind they are crying, you are fooling nobody ????.

Nope. 
 

I see it differently. 

[JonnyF]

3 minutes ago, xtrnuno41 said:

The hating from Jeremy is compared and on cellular level that would be much worse. If he was allowed to shoot one of them, he would shoot Meghan. So, odd to let a murderer get away to kill a non murderer. But ok his ego is out of control.

Clarkson is a murderer? ????

 

Sorry, did I miss something? I thought he just made an amusing jibe. 

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

Nope. 
 

I see it differently. 

You have my sympathy. You must really struggle in life if you are so inept at reading human behaviour.

 

Although as a foreigner in Thailand, it might actually be a blessing. ????

[Bluespunk]

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You have my sympathy. You must really struggle in life if you are so inept at reading human behaviour.

 

Although as a foreigner in Thailand, it might actually be a blessing. ????

Nope. No problems at all in reading people. Part of my job really. 

You seem to have any number of problems with people having different views though, hence your use of abusive language. That must make life difficult…

[xtrnuno41]

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Clarkson is a murderer? ????

 

Sorry, did I miss something? I thought he just made an amusing jibe. 

You missed something, I didnt say Clarkson is a murderer.

The comparing is out of proportion, but ok you could say that is Clarkson.

In this case , he is just a nitwit and should shut up.

A royalty was once made, but most of them are criminals, who gained their wealth on other humans. Many of them were killed finally, but sadly leaving other bad people in power. 

[Hanaguma]

Seems to me that Meghan was genuinely adored by the public when she came on the scene. Her and Harry's wedding were the event of the year, millions watched and cheered. If there were to be any racism or hatred, it would have started early on.  Not later.

 

So, what happened? IMHO it started when Meghan realized that she was expected to be a PART of "The FIrm", and not it's star.  She became insanely jealous of William and Kate especially, and it showed. Megs has a very high opinion of herself- based on what exactly I have no idea. Yet it shows. So she went from victor to victim.  And started looking for any possible 'evidence' to support her incorrect ideas.

 

And now we are here.

[Liverpool Lou]

3 hours ago, Credo said:

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are an admirable couple.  They have exposed the racist underbelly of the nation and the misogyny that is so abundant and evident even on this forum. 

 

I suspect the rifts in the Royal Family will heal with time, and they are likely to begin to understand the many ways they have contributed to an endemic problem of racism.  Hopefully, they will lead from the top.   

 

The only part of your comment that isn't total, non-empirical nonsense regarding the previous and current Royal family is, "I suspect the rifts in the Royal Family will heal with time".

[Liverpool Lou]

3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

3 hours ago, Credo said:

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are an admirable couple.  They have exposed the racist underbelly of the nation and the misogyny that is so abundant and evident even on this forum. 

 

 

 

Expand  

That is one of the posts where you aren't sure whether they are being serious or not 

My guess is that he is being serious but he is seriously deluded.

[Liverpool Lou]

3 hours ago, Credo said:

3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I have replied to these kinds of posts before when people pretend to be serious and they are just messing about 

 I simply have an understanding of racism,

Based on the content of your post in question, you clearly do not have any understanding of racism in the current Royal family, or Queen Elizabeth's

[Liverpool Lou]

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Can we please stop giving this wretched, dysfunctional family oxygen? A king that wanted to be a tampon, a pedophile prince. I rest my case.

You may need to pick up your case again and explain who you are accusing of being a paedophile prince.

[Liverpool Lou]

1 hour ago, cowellandrew said:

What a load of nonsense!

Try and see racism in Thailand, start with the 2 tier prices!

 

Jesus Christ...

[orchis]

On December 14 both Piers Morgan and Jeremy Clarkson had lunch with Camilla, the Queen Consort. As is her right.

Edited December 20, 2022 by orchis

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Jesus Christ...

Any excuse for some. 

[Mac Mickmanus]

11 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Based on the content of your post in question, you clearly do not have any understanding of racism in the current Royal family, or Queen Elizabeth's

Yes, I do not believe there is racism within the UK Royal Family

[Purdey]

The royal family is supposed to keep itself away from this sort of public controversy. What next? Meghan standing for President?

This appeared to start because she wanted to be a princess and he wanted all the money and privilege he thought he deserved whilst acting as a spoilt brat.

Personally, stripping both of titles and ranks is the next step. Let's see if Netflix will want to interview a couple of spoilt former royalty.

Edited December 20, 2022 by Purdey

[Liverpool Lou]

1 minute ago, orchis said:

On December 14 both Piers Morgan and Jeremy Clarkson had dinner with Camilla, the Queen Consort. As is her right.

Are you just reporting the Royal calendar or was there a point to your comment?

[Liverpool Lou]

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

14 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Based on the content of your post in question, you clearly do not have any understanding of racism in the current Royal family, or Queen Elizabeth's

Yes, I do not believe there is racism within the UK Royal Family

My comment that you quoted and responded to there was to Credo, not you.

[Mac Mickmanus]

45 minutes ago, xtrnuno41 said:

If he was allowed to shoot one of them, he would shoot Meghan.

Could you clarify, has Jerry actually said that and meant it seriously ?

[orchis]

12 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Are you just reporting the Royal calendar or was there a point to your comment?

just reporting her agenda, I mean, calendar.

Edited December 20, 2022 by orchis

[Chomper Higgot]

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I thought his comments were pretty funny. Obviously said in jest for a bit of a laugh. Certainly made me chuckle.

 

It's no surprise that the pearl clutchers have come out in force to wring their hands at the horror of it all. ????

It doesn’t surprise me at all that you and a few others here found Clarkson’s vile comments funny or otherwise excusable.

 

I would have predicted as much.

[cleopatra2]

40 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Seems to me that Meghan was genuinely adored by the public when she came on the scene. Her and Harry's wedding were the event of the year, millions watched and cheered. If there were to be any racism or hatred, it would have started early on.  Not later.

 

So, what happened? IMHO it started when Meghan realized that she was expected to be a PART of "The FIrm", and not it's star.  She became insanely jealous of William and Kate especially, and it showed. Megs has a very high opinion of herself- based on what exactly I have no idea. Yet it shows. So she went from victor to victim.  And started looking for any possible 'evidence' to support her incorrect ideas.

 

And now we are here.

So you not recall the newspaper articles

Harry's girl on pornhub. 

If they had a child it would have rich and exotic blood. 

Straight out of Compton

 

The protocol breaking press statement from Harry in 2016 about the smears and abuse being directed at his girlfriend. 

 

[RuamRudy]

27 minutes ago, Purdey said:

The royal family is supposed to keep itself away from this sort of public controversy. What next? Meghan standing for President?

This appeared to start because she wanted to be a princess and he wanted all the money and privilege he thought he deserved whilst acting as a spoilt brat.

Personally, stripping both of titles and ranks is the next step. Let's see if Netflix will want to interview a couple of spoilt former royalty.

That's a start, but why stop there? Let's get rid of this entire, costly clown show. The days of almost ethereal, untouchable elites has gone. We can now see what a cast of truly dysfunctional and utterly reprehensible people the entire family is. Time to put an end to this farce.

[GroveHillWanderer]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

If you can't see that is mocking behaviour, either you are gaslighting (most likely), or you genuinely lack the ability to interpret human behaviour, body language and responses to them.

Just to point out, not everyone agrees with you that she is mocking British royalty or its traditions in that clip.

 

When I did a Google search, the first article I found actually starts out by saying:

 

Quote

No, the Duchess was not mocking ‘British culture’ with her curtsy joke.

And then goes on to state:

 

Quote

Meghan demonstrates how long and deep, she curtsied – something a Brit might cringe at slightly watching – but that was the point of the joke, she had no clue what she was doing and so her curtsy was slightly ridiculous.

 

To most viewers, the clear implication is that Meghan is mocking herself ...

Meghan Markle curtsy remarks

 

I would agree with the characterisation in the article. Has it occurred to you that maybe you're the one misinterpreting it?

[Elkski]

I can't believe there are many who support the continuation of this "royal" family or any example in the world.   What an old ugly concept.   What a bunch of ugly examples of  people  and morals. 

Camille over Diana,.  The lolita express eager beaver.   What a bunch of losers.   Can't end soon enough and here too. 

[hotandsticky]

1 minute ago, Elkski said:

I can't believe there are many who support the continuation of this "royal" family or any example in the world.   What an old ugly concept.   What a bunch of ugly examples of  people  and morals. 

Camille over Diana,.  The lolita express eager beaver.   What a bunch of losers.   Can't end soon enough and here too. 

 

 

I guess you are not too familiar with Royalty and it's history.

 

I know many of your countrymen who would give their right arm for some of that history, tradition and quality.

[Chomper Higgot]

9 minutes ago, Elkski said:

I can't believe there are many who support the continuation of this "royal" family or any example in the world.   What an old ugly concept.   What a bunch of ugly examples of  people  and morals. 

Camille over Diana,.  The lolita express eager beaver.   What a bunch of losers.   Can't end soon enough and here too. 

The arguments for a British republicanism do not need to rely on racism, misogyny or any other form of hatred.

 

In truth they’d be far better made without such hate.

 

 

Edited December 20, 2022 by Chomper Higgot

[Hanaguma]

35 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

So you not recall the newspaper articles

Harry's girl on pornhub. 

If they had a child it would have rich and exotic blood. 

Straight out of Compton

 

The protocol breaking press statement from Harry in 2016 about the smears and abuse being directed at his girlfriend. 

 

Those mean nothing. Every member of the Royals gets the same treatment (if not worse) from the gutter press. The public at large was 1000% behind them, as were the whole of the mainstream media. The truth is that Meghan just couldn't stand playing 'second fiddle' to Kate.  Basically she wanted the perqs of the job (servants, palace etc) without putting in the hours. 

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Those mean nothing. Every member of the Royals gets the same treatment (if not worse) from the gutter press. The public at large was 1000% behind them, as were the whole of the mainstream media. The truth is that Meghan just couldn't stand playing 'second fiddle' to Kate.  Basically she wanted the perqs of the job (servants, palace etc) without putting in the hours. 

Oddly you give us a regurgitation of the view from the gutter press.

 

They stoke this garbage to increase sales, the gullible fall for it.

 

 

Edited December 20, 2022 by Chomper Higgot