Jump to content

'Romeo and Juliet' child actors sue over 1968 nude scene


ozimoron

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Next: Jesus is suing whoever because there are bare-chested pictures from them out there. They were nonbinary but because of the oppressing patriarchy they were too shy to come out at that time.

Forgetting something? She was 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Caldera said:

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why we need statutes of limitation, so that old goats (m/f/d) can't clog the courts with their travesties ad infinitum.

 

They should be held in contempt for wasting everyone's time. 

There was a statute of limitations. The administration dropped it for one year. This is why E Jean Carroll could sue trump and why this suit could go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jerno said:

Convenient that the director is now dead, unable to defend the Producers or Paramount.   

What is there to defend? She was in a movie topless at age 15.

 

They were unable to sue when he was alive. The act covers children, not adults. Presumably, by the time they were old enough and had the wherewithal to sue the statute of limitations prevented them. They still need to prove their case which will be difficult because of the time elapsed.

 

I suspect there will be the usual suspects along to blame the victims.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel at 16 the boy is on one side and at 15 the girl is  on the other side of a very blurry line.

My wild guess. The woman knows she can't win the case without the man's supporting evidence that they were firmly pushed. The man agreed to be part of the case as long as he got part of the spoils.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Caldera said:

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why we need statutes of limitation, so that old goats (m/f/d) can't clog the courts with their travesties ad infinitum.

 

They should be held in contempt for wasting everyone's time. 

The opposite happened, there was some kind of statute of limitations which was recently removed - and that's how and why they can sue at this time.

 

Considering they were actually wearing clothes at the time I doubt this has much if any chance of success - they're likely working with some kind of litigation financer for a cut of any potential settlement.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Read to the end of the BBC article.

This is an ART film!

These two oldsters are participating in a cynical money grab!

It really doesn't matter what they call it , it was two naked children  in a sex scene .

   The BBC had an appalling record of that sort of thing  , mainly to do with heir staff rather than what they broadcast though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing with these lets go back in time "me too" thingies is that there has often been a hysterical lack of common sense and judgement that fails to differentiate one case from another.

For example conflating  a dead serious case like Harvey Weinstein with the rather trivial comedic prank that sunk Al Franken.

This Romeo and Juliet case is just 100 percent stupid.

Nudity in an art film from decades ago where that nudity was essential to the movie?

Are they having a laugh?

Yes it's true that today even though various kinds of media shows very explicit teenage sex scenes (not talking about pornos) if the production is in the US and some other countries they will now use young adults to portray teens.

Standards did change on that at least in the US. There is nothing wrong with actors playing younger when it works dramatically but often they are casting 30 year olds that really do look too much like 30 year olds which does take away from the believability of the plots.

 

BTW, did y'all see this film back when it was released? I did. 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

They are still underage , paying Children to get naked and filming them  doesn't make it acceptable .

  Just because you pay them , doesn't make it OK

I would like to ask, where were the parents in all of this, no doubt they would have had to sign off as their guardian's, heaven forbid I seen14-15-16 year old's topless on Bondi Beach, should I sue them for throwing that in my face without my consent.

 

It is not porn, it is art and there is the fine line.

 

Haven't seen the movie, but...????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

I would like to ask, where were the parents in all of this, no doubt they would have had to sign off as their guardian's, heaven forbid I seen14-15-16 year old's topless on Bondi Beach, should I sue them for throwing that in my face without my consent.

 

It is not porn, it is art and there is the fine line.

 

Haven't seen the movie, but...????

It's very good but I don't want to watch it again as I prefer to have the memory of seeing it when it was released.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

YES!!!!   Get that money, and arrest everyone.

 

I'm suing the hospital where I was born, indecent exposure, called me a "boy" and I clearly identify as a "buffalo" and I was nude around other adults. trauma.  

 

suing for 20000000000 zillion .  

 

Reminds me of Spider-man.  Really, how?  One bite, all these superpowers and you get everything.  The QUICK fix; no work, just luck.   They should also try to arrest everyone who saw the movie, shared the movie, sold the movie, etc..... kiddy porn!!!!!!

 

OK, back to stealing Bitcoins from North Korea...late!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 1

      Harris-Walz Campaign Opts for Media Silence as Election Nears

    2. 82

      Does Donald Trump Have Dementia?

    3. 116

      Kamala Harris Expresses Openness to Exploring Reparations for Slavery

    4. 251

      What’s the best area in Thailand for expats to settle for long-term living?

    5. 251

      What’s the best area in Thailand for expats to settle for long-term living?

    6. 37

      Thailand to borrow 2.59 trillion baht for 2025 budget

    7. 2

      Thailand Live Saturday 21 September 2024

    8. 461

      I Love Donald Trump

    9. 0

      Baht's biggest surge since 1998 poses risk to tourism and Exports

    10. 16

      Common reporting standard (CRS) information

    11. 19

      High cholesterol as a pre-existing condition?

    12. 27

      Truth social is the future! Buy now while it's on sale.

    13. 4

      Vehicle Crashes into Canal, Woman Found Dead Inside

    14. 0

      Rotterdam Stabbing Rampage Knifeman shouted "Allahu Akbar"

×
×
  • Create New...
""