Jump to content

Swedish man suspected of running sex network in Thailand


webfact

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Do NOT clip posts. I reported you for doing so. In a post about child exploitation it's critical that my posts are not misinterpreted.

It's not against the rules to clip posts, that's a feature to make following the discussion easier. Good day.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A post in violation of fair use policy and the replies have been removed:

 

27. You will not post any copyrighted material except as fair use laws apply (as in the case of news articles). Only post a link, the headline and three sentences from the article. Content in the public domain is limited to the same restrictions.

 

Please review this forum rule about "clipping" posts:

 

28. You will not make changes to messages quoted from other members posts, except for purposes of shortening the quoted post. Do not shorten any post in a way that alters the context of the original post. Do not change the formatting of the post you are quoting.

Edited by metisdead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

The original commenter suggested the children may have consented and thus weren't harmed. This is the point that all pedophiles makes. Better keep an eye on it because these things are becoming more mainstream and will likely be the next push in liberalizing sexuality (like gay marriage was not too long ago). Look up "minor attracted persons or MAPs"  to see what is being said.

Children can't consent, so whatever comes next is BS

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Um, surely anyone in a swimming pool will be 'half-naked', unless you are Muslim....  Sometimes people misinterpret innocent photos...

there were many photos in the pool, by the pool and in the gardens....pubescent girls...the site was gone in about 24 hours...photos started with the hotel, rooms and restaurant....in Sihanoukville...looked good 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, proton said:

These people, and some on here, have no idea how much devastation they cause to children's lives and their families. As somebody who had 2 suicides in my family caused by child abuse, and another life screwed up I hope he gets 20 years.

My friend's 22 year old son was at a grad party when he went to the bar while his gf was in a hotel room with friends. His gf received a phone call. She ran to the balcony and jumped. It was her abusive father. The room was on the first floor and she landed in the garden and was spared serious injury. This was three weeks ago.

Proton is right. These abusers are evil and the harm never ends.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ozimoron said:

One should be enough to lock him up.

A bit unreasonable if he simply captured a few pics of girls under eighteen unknowingly amongst ten of thousands. 
Not that I am defending his actions, since I know nothing about what he was doing. Though personally, a while back I met someone who said she was in her twenties, who turned out to be seventeen and had altered her ID card to that effect. 
So if inadvertent in the scheme of things, it may be an issue of pornography in general, as opposed to child pornography. Of course if it’s obvious that the person is underage/underdeveloped, you could argue that he should have not including it in whatever he was offering. 
Though on actually reading the article….and mention of schools, I think it’s best to step back from any defence of his character. 

 

Edited by NextG
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NorthernRyland said:

I was just listening to a podcast and the guest said this is the exact reason he abandoned Liberalism, that being there was no liberal/secular argument against child sexual exploitation. This is a perfect example of that.

Well the guest is talking utter rot. What absolute twaddle.

 

Of course there are secular arguments against child sexual exploitation/paedophilia.

 

I certainly  wouldn't waste my time with any broadcaster/podcast that let that kind of intellectual garbage slip through unchallenged. Not fit to be on the air/net.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Well the guest is talking utter rot. What absolute twaddle.

 

Of course there are secular arguments against child sexual exploitation/paedophilia.

 

I certainly  wouldn't waste my time with any broadcaster/podcast that let that kind of intellectual garbage slip through unchallenged. Not fit to be on the air/net.

Notice the sheer amount of child sexualization in the media today and compare that to 30 years ago and ask how we got here. It's a slippery slope and the direction it's going is obvious.

 

just one recent example is this: 

https://www.euronews.com/culture/2022/11/23/fashion-label-balenciaga-pulls-ads-featuring-children-with-bondage-teddy

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

Notice the sheer amount of child sexualization in the media today and compare that to 30 years ago and ask how we got here. It's a slippery slope and the direction it's going is obvious.

 

just one recent example is this: 

https://www.euronews.com/culture/2022/11/23/fashion-label-balenciaga-pulls-ads-featuring-children-with-bondage-teddy

 

What does that have to do with my comment?

 

My comment says there are plenty of secular arguments against child sexual exploitation/paedophilia. And people who claim otherwise are talking rubbish. That's all.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

Notice the sheer amount of child sexualization in the media today and compare that to 30 years ago and ask how we got here. It's a slippery slope and the direction it's going is obvious.

 

just one recent example is this: 

https://www.euronews.com/culture/2022/11/23/fashion-label-balenciaga-pulls-ads-featuring-children-with-bondage-teddy

 

It is a bad choice to use this as an example of secular/liberal bias as the owner of Balenciaga is one of the prominent members of the Jewish community in Paris and a patron of the church in France including paying for the restoration of Notre-dame.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SatEng said:

It is a bad choice to use this as an example of secular/liberal bias as the owner of Balenciaga is one of the prominent members of the Jewish community in Paris and a patron of the church in France including paying for the restoration of Notre-dame.

Balenciaga is owned by the Kering Company 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, d4dang said:

Before covid I was searching for a hotel/resort in Cambodia. One hotel site had photos of of half naked kids in the pool. Boys and girls about 10 years old. I reported it. The scum that run and use these sites should all be locked up forever. Give the guys that bust them huge rewards.

Its quite normal and common for all people, kids included , to wear minimal clothes whilst swimming in swimming pools.

   Who did you report it to ?

Its not illegal to wear swimming costumes in swimming pools

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SatEng said:

It is the liberal/secular movement that has been at the forefront of protecting children from sexual trafficking across most of the western world and pushing for legislation and punishment.

 

Where has sexual liberation and the sexualization of children been coming from in the world over the past decades? Not Africa, Asia for the Middle East, It's coming from secular European and Anglo-sphere countries with the USA being the vanguard I would argue).

 

It's a big debate and not something we can't go into here but it's a undeniable fact something about these countries is promoting these ideas. That's why people are questioning what about secular liberalism is causing this and where's it's going.

 

Remember it wasn't that long ago Obama in the US said marriage was between a man a women. Fast forward today, transexuals are a protected class and sexual matters are being taught to younger and younger people in schools. Research this if you're not following the trends but it's pretty clear where it's leading and I argue it's baked into liberal mortality (no I'm not a Christian or Mulism etc... so don't ask me to answer for them).

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...