Jump to content

King Charles is 'evicting Harry and Meghan !


Social Media

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

Has DNA testing ever been done to prove James Hewitt is not Harry's father ?

A question that will be asked for eternity I think. However according to the records, Diana never met Hewitt until 1986. Harry was born 1884

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Andrew's only 'crime' was paying this charlatan off. Had he gone to court she'd have dropped the case like she did with Dershowitz. 

Even Ghislaine Maxwell said she doesn't remember the incriminating 'photo' and stated it was probably a fake.

Edited by KhunLA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sheryl said:

The British tabloid press seems to like to fan the flames and exaggerate (in general of course, but  especially with regard to this subject)

 

You can't "evict" people from a place they no longer live in. 

 

I suppose "King asks Andrew to move into vacant Frogmore Cotrage formerly occupied by Harry & Megan" doesn't have the same  appeal.

They should have kept quiet, changed the locks and let Andrew move in. Then film it when Harry and his wife turn up, Jeremy Beadle style. Sell it to Netflix.

 

Seriously though, looking at recent pictures of Harry I think he's finally worked it out. He got played, or maybe played himself. Trouble is, he is so dim it will take him 5 years to work out his next move. 

 

When she's done with him, maybe he can return to the family and work for charities helping Male survivors of psychological domestic abuse? He likes playing the victim.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

They should have kept quiet, changed the locks and let Andrew move in. Then film it when Harry and his wife turn up, Jeremy Beadle style. Sell it to Netflix.

 

Seriously though, looking at recent pictures of Harry I think he's finally worked it out. He got played, or maybe played himself. Trouble is, he is so dim it will take him 5 years to work out his next move. 

 

When she's done with him, maybe he can return to the family and work for charities helping Male survivors of psychological domestic abuse? He likes playing the victim.

I suggest you read the book.  He doesn't play the victim.  He is straightforward and honest about his misdeeds.   He served his queen and country with dignity and honor.  

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

He blew it when he attacked, or colluded in attacks on his own family. Honourable people just don't do family dirty washing in public.

Obviously another poster who didn't read the book.  I'd hardly say he 'attacked or colluded in attacks' on his family.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2023 at 9:19 AM, KhunLA said:

Even Ghislaine Maxwell said she doesn't remember the incriminating 'photo' and stated it was probably a fake.

Because she has nothing to gain from that conspiracy theory garbage being viewed as credulous…

Edited by Bluespunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2023 at 6:19 AM, KhunLA said:

Even Ghislaine Maxwell said she doesn't remember the incriminating 'photo' and stated it was probably a fake.

And the Female in the photo wasn't exactly a Child, she was 17 years old and she's never been identified and the photo was supposed to be from 20 years ago .

   Its not as if Andrew has a history of fondling pre teen children

 

The infamous snap with the Duke of York, which was reportedly taken in March 2001 at Ghislaine Maxwell's London apartment, shows Virginia Giuffre, then aged 17 and known as Virginia Roberts, in a white tank top and colourful trousers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

And the Female in the photo wasn't exactly a Child, she was 17 years old and she's never been identified and the photo was supposed to be from 20 years ago .

   Its not as if Andrew has a history of fondling pre teen children

 

The infamous snap with the Duke of York, which was reportedly taken in March 2001 at Ghislaine Maxwell's London apartment, shows Virginia Giuffre, then aged 17 and known as Virginia Roberts, in a white tank top and colourful trousers

You’re rambling again. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

"disowning his son for marrying a black woman"

"this racist piece of detritus"

 

If you think all decisions are based on skin colour, maybe you're the one with race issues.  

 

 

 

Yes, from the same poster who accused me of being a racist for posting a photo of the new MLK state , has made another untrue claim about King Charles "disowning his son for marry a Black Woman"

   That is completely false  ; King Charles hasn't even disowned Harry , he has just asked him to move out of  house , well, move out of a house that he doesn't even live in .

   Harry moved to the USA and doesn't need the UK house anymore , IMO, you would have to be a racist yourself to mention her skin colour , as its irrelevant

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

And the Female in the photo wasn't exactly a Child, she was 17 years old and she's never been identified and the photo was supposed to be from 20 years ago .

   Its not as if Andrew has a history of fondling pre teen children

 

The infamous snap with the Duke of York, which was reportedly taken in March 2001 at Ghislaine Maxwell's London apartment, shows Virginia Giuffre, then aged 17 and known as Virginia Roberts, in a white tank top and colourful trousers

Please excuse my stupid question, MMM, but how do we know she was 17 years old if she has never been identified? 

Edited by asf6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CG1 Blue said:

"disowning his son for marrying a black woman"

"this racist piece of detritus"

 

If you think all decisions are based on skin colour, maybe you're the one with race issues. 

It's blindingly obvious the right wing have a problem with her skin colour.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

And the Female in the photo wasn't exactly a Child, she was 17 years old and she's never been identified and the photo was supposed to be from 20 years ago .

   Its not as if Andrew has a history of fondling pre teen children

 

The infamous snap with the Duke of York, which was reportedly taken in March 2001 at Ghislaine Maxwell's London apartment, shows Virginia Giuffre, then aged 17 and known as Virginia Roberts, in a white tank top and colourful trousers

Although he does seem to have an unusually long left arm!

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2023 at 7:48 PM, JonnyF said:

They should have kept quiet, changed the locks and let Andrew move in. Then film it when Harry and his wife turn up, Jeremy Beadle style. Sell it to Netflix.

 

Seriously though, looking at recent pictures of Harry I think he's finally worked it out. He got played, or maybe played himself. Trouble is, he is so dim it will take him 5 years to work out his next move. 

 

When she's done with him, maybe he can return to the family and work for charities helping Male survivors of psychological domestic abuse? He likes playing the victim.

To be fair to Harry, he comes from a family who are hardly renowned for their intellect. Generations of inbreeding plus a generally lazy, privileged and over-indulged lifestyle has given us a monarchy that is weak, narcissistic (although I will concede that this seems to have been a trait for monarchies throughout history) and incapable of leading, let alone functioning by themselves. 

 

"His lifestyle would seem extravagant to Louis XIV: a team of four valets so that one is always available to lay out and pick up his clothes; a servant to squeeze his toothpaste on to his brush, and another who once held the specimen bottle while he gave a urine sample. Step into the world of the Prince of Wales, a lifestyle so pampered that even the Queen has complained that it is grotesque."

 

Pampered prince puts sun king in shade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Right wing Conservative Home secretary Priti Patel 

 

British Citizens In European Union Denied Work Benefits Rights Post Brexit:  Minister Priti Patel

 

   Right wing Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak

 

Priti Patel catches up with Rishi Sunak

 

Meghan Markle 

 

prince harry and meghan smiling on tour

 

Kwasi Kwarteng . Conservative right wing former Chancellor

 

Kwasi Kwarteng insists: 'I'm not going anywhere' as Liz Truss set to  reverse tax cut

 

 

 

What is the point of these photos? Where is the connection?

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...