Six more members of the Biden clan may have benefitted from the family’s various business schemes, bringing the total number of kin implicated up to nine, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer revealed Monday.

 

The findings come after the Kentucky GOP congressman and other lawmakers on the panel examined suspicious activity reports sent by banks to the Treasury Department alerting of potential criminal activity in transactions involving President Biden’s family. 

 

“Thousands of pages of financial records related to the Biden family, their companies, and associates’ business schemes were made available to members of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, which confirm the importance of this investigation,” Comer said in a statement.

 

READ MORE

https://nypost.com/2023/04/17/six-more-bidens-may-have-gained-from-family-business-schemes-comer/

 

This is a bombshell. The walls are closing in on the President and his clan.  It is the beginning of the end for his Presidency.

11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

This is a bombshell. The walls are closing in on the President and his clan.  It is the beginning of the end for his Presidency.

I hope so.  But of course the lefty news wants no part of it. So the sheep have no part of it either.

All this and no post from the Democrats? Biden and his family needs to under go a full investigation whether he is in office or not.

All good but no evidence? The FBI have been investigating Hunter for years. Where are the charges, grand juries, subpoenas, other legal words?

Will the investigation goes as far back as to Ireland. 

20 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

This is a bombshell. The walls are closing in on the President and his clan.  It is the beginning of the end for his Presidency.

 

9 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

All this and no post from the Democrats? Biden and his family needs to under go a full investigation whether he is in office or not.

In fact this is a nothingburger as you should know from past refutations. Suspicious Activity Reports or SAR's for short, are documents required by the government to   be filed by banks when a transfer of money looks like it might in some way be suspect. They are not the products of criminal investigations.

 

How many of these SARs are really illegal activity versus false positives?

Our data indicate that about 4 percent of SARs result in any follow-up from law enforcement. A tiny subset of these results in an arrest and ultimately a conviction.

https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/

 

I read the full article.  A lot of speculation and hyperbole, no mention of specific crimes or evidence. 

 

If any of the Bidens committed crimes, then prosecute them.  If the President is implicated then investigate.  Until then, I won't waste time on other people's excited speculation.

19 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

This is a bombshell. The walls are closing in on the President and his clan.  It is the beginning of the end for his Presidency.

A story in the New York Post has never been a bombshell so much as a squib. Ever. Name a single exclusive they ever published which led anywhere.

11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

This is a bombshell. The walls are closing in on the President and his clan.  It is the beginning of the end for his Presidency.

From the powerful beacon of the Murdoch press that is, The New York Post, and what appears to be a geriatric Fox second string talking head in the picture. This will go exactly nowhere. Why not get back to the Laptop From Hell? That at least might have a dickpic, plus Hunters porn collection to keep MAGA no hopers a howling. 

Meanwhile for the rest of us, ten days to the draft.    

If any of this were real then Chairman Comer, and his committee, would have issued a full report, and referred charges to the DoJ.

 

Instead he's yapping on Fox Business with that moron Larry (sniff-sniff) Kudlow.

 

51 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

This is a bombshell.

Pfft. It's a dud.

 

About as bomb-shellish as the Durham "investigation", or "Benghazi".

 

 

45 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

All this and no post from the Democrats? Biden and his family needs to under go a full investigation whether he is in office or not.

Ever since my commenting debunking the significance of those SAR's, not post from the right wingers? They need to undergo a serious reassessment of their beliefs and standards of evidence.

36 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

All good but no evidence? The FBI have been investigating Hunter for years. Where are the charges, grand juries, subpoenas, other legal words?

Yes, it does rather support the claims of a dual justice system, doesn't it. The judicial/beaurocratic treatment of Presidents 44 and 45 are worlds apart. 

 

As a gentle reminder of why Biden's alleged crimes are of a different magnitude to the Stormy judicial moonshot.

 

“To be clear, Joe Biden is the ‘big guy.’ This evidence raises troubling questions about whether President Biden is a national security risk and about whether he is compromised by foreign governments.”

Rep James Comer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/dissecting-gop-claims-about-hunter-biden-deals-allegedly-involving-his-father/

3 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Yes, it does rather support the claims of a dual justice system, doesn't it. The judicial/beaurocratic treatment of Presidents 44 and 45 are worlds apart. 

 

As a gentle reminder of why Biden's alleged crimes are of a different magnitude to the Stormy judicial moonshot.

 

“To be clear, Joe Biden is the ‘big guy.’ This evidence raises troubling questions about whether President Biden is a national security risk and about whether he is compromised by foreign governments.”

Rep James Comer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/dissecting-gop-claims-about-hunter-biden-deals-allegedly-involving-his-father/

One of Hunter Biden's associates asked "10% for the big guy?" Even if that big guy turns out to be Joe Biden, it was a question. No evidence that Biden was actually involved in these dealing and very strong evidence that he wasn't. As Hunter Biden remarked, when he approached his father about getting involved he got an "emphatic no" in response. 

What makes this even more nuts is the Biden has been by far the President who has been the hardest on the Chinese. They're not getting much value for money if they actually did make some sort of payments to Joe Biden. And there is no evidence that the money received by the other Bidens came from the Chinese govt. In fact, the source of the money is now in prison because of allegations of corruption coming from the Chinese govt.
 

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

One of Hunter Biden's associates asked "10% for the big guy?" Even if that big guy turns out to be Joe Biden, it was a question. No evidence that Biden was actually involved in these dealing and very strong evidence that he wasn't.

The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was when the laptop was debunked and called Russian dissinformation -without evidence and even though the family did not deny it's veracity.

 Now it's verified you have a problem. There is either a reason all this money was paid to the Bidens, or the foreigners just showered cash on the Bidens for fun? You can be the very first former laptop denier to account for these payments that the left moved heaven and earth to prevent the public from being informed about before the 2020 election.  

5 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was when the laptop was debunked and called Russian dissinformation -without evidence and even though the family did not deny it's veracity.

 Now it's verified you have a problem. There is either a reason all this money was paid to the Bidens, or the foreigners just showered cash on the Bidens for fun? You can be the very first former laptop denier to account for these payments that the left moved heaven and earth to prevent the public from being informed about before the 2020 election.  

Really? What strong evidence is there on that laptop? I agree that the odds are strong that Hunter Biden was dealt with because some people hoped that his association with his father could help deliver them a deal? But what evidence is there that Joe Biden was involved? We've been over this territory before. The alleged meetings and other junk accusations. Not one dime of that money has been traced to Joe Biden. The US Attorney for Delaware who is a Trump appointee has been given carte blanche to investigate Hunter Biden. He gets final say in what gets investigated. So far, nothing. So far, you've got nothing.

 

And has been pointed out to you many times the contents of the laptop were released by the NY Post without doing any investigative journalism first to establish its validity. The original reported assigned to the case refused to write it up because of that very reason. The people in possession of the information refused to release the metadata that could have confirmed its authenticity. Of course, you know all this and most likely will evaporate just the way you have in the past when confronted with this information.

6 minutes ago, placeholder said:

We've been over this territory before. The alleged meetings and other junk accusations.

Another verifiably false assertion. You might want to inform yourself better on the subject before making false claims. Many "facts" have changed from when the lappy was a hoax.

 

The meetings you guys claimed never happened

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president

1 hour ago, vandeventer said:

All this and no post from the Democrats? Biden and his family needs to under go a full investigation whether he is in office or not.

Try this for size.

 

Banks notify international interbank transactions above $10,000, I make a number of such transactions per year.

 

Each is notified as a ‘potential criminal transaction’ on the basis of the legal requirement to report, not on the basis of the transaction being a crime - The banks do not themselves investigate.

 

“Financial institutions and money transfer providers are obligated to report international transfers that exceed $10,000.”

 

https://www.bossrevolution.com/en-us/blog/international-money-transfer-laws

 

So calm down, Comer and Murdoch’s NY Post mischaracterizing normal bank reporting might be the kind of nonsense you are eager to swallow but it is not evidence of any crimes.

 

 

36 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was when the laptop was debunked and called Russian dissinformation -without evidence and even though the family did not deny it's veracity.

 Now it's verified you have a problem. There is either a reason all this money was paid to the Bidens, or the foreigners just showered cash on the Bidens for fun? You can be the very first former laptop denier to account for these payments that the left moved heaven and earth to prevent the public from being informed about before the 2020 election.  

“The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was”

You what???

It doesn’t work like that. If you are going to accuse someone of a crime you need evidence they committed a crime, they don’t need to provide evidence they did not.

 

 

18 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Another verifiably false assertion. You might want to inform yourself better on the subject before making false claims. Many "facts" have changed from when the lappy was a hoax.

 

The meetings you guys claimed never happened

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president

FOX News, that organization that admitted in court to lying and even then went on to lie before the court.

 

Is that where you go for your ‘Facts’?

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Try this for size.

 

Banks notify international interbank transactions above $10,000, I make a number of such transactions per year.

 

Each is notified as a ‘potential criminal transaction’ on the basis of the legal requirement to report, not on the basis of the transaction being a crime - The banks do not themselves investigate.

 

“Financial institutions and money transfer providers are obligated to report international transfers that exceed $10,000.”

 

https://www.bossrevolution.com/en-us/blog/international-money-transfer-laws

 

So calm down, Comer and Murdoch’s NY Post mischaracterizing normal bank reporting might be the kind of nonsense you are eager to swallow but it is not evidence of any crimes.

 

 

Where there is smoke there is fire.

https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

1 hour ago, 300sd said:

I hope so.  But of course the lefty news wants no part of it. So the sheep have no part of it either.

It is that word MAY again.

 

Equally they MAY not.

 

Proof is needed and not allegations, unless of course you are a MAGA supporter, then you will believe anything bad remotely mentioning President Biden.

 

OTOH for Maga supporters, EX president Trump is as pure as the New York slush.

Really no surprise when it comes to this family.

 

Absolutely disgraceful. 

2 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Where there is smoke there is fire.

https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

None of this is smoke, it’s all hot air from Comer.

 

Accusations of crimes need evidence, he has no evidence of crimes that’s why he uses the terms ‘may have’, ‘possible’ and other such mealy-mouthed nonsense.

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Yes, it does rather support the claims of a dual justice system, doesn't it. The judicial/beaurocratic treatment of Presidents 44 and 45 are worlds apart. 

 

As a gentle reminder of why Biden's alleged crimes are of a different magnitude to the Stormy judicial moonshot.

 

“To be clear, Joe Biden is the ‘big guy.’ This evidence raises troubling questions about whether President Biden is a national security risk and about whether he is compromised by foreign governments.”

Rep James Comer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/dissecting-gop-claims-about-hunter-biden-deals-allegedly-involving-his-father/

It proves nothing of the sort as well you know.

 

Now real solid proof would go a long way, but as usual you have nothing.

 

It seems odd to me that the Trump supporters here on ANN profess to know more than the people from the FBI, DoJ etc who are actually involved hands on in any investigation.

 

Yet when the investigation involves Trump, and the proof is there, they don't believe or accept anything.

 

Full on bias and dual standards I suppose.

56 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was when the laptop was debunked and called Russian dissinformation -without evidence and even though the family did not deny it's veracity.

 Now it's verified you have a problem. There is either a reason all this money was paid to the Bidens, or the foreigners just showered cash on the Bidens for fun? You can be the very first former laptop denier to account for these payments that the left moved heaven and earth to prevent the public from being informed about before the 2020 election.  

As has been asked many times by posters here, where is your proof?

 

YOU claim it, now YOU back it up, if you can.

37 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Another verifiably false assertion. You might want to inform yourself better on the subject before making false claims. Many "facts" have changed from when the lappy was a hoax.

 

The meetings you guys claimed never happened

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president

And Fox News is your verifiable source?

 

 

555555555555555555

17 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Where there is smoke there is fire.

https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

The oversight committee lit the fire. They are arsonists posing as firemen.

16 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Pure projection.

Tell it to the 9 Biden family members that have their fingers in the cookie jar. A Special counsel is needed again.

6 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Tell it to the 9 Biden family members that have their fingers in the cookie jar. A Special counsel is needed again.

A subpoena or prosecution is needed. Absent either of those there's no there there. Just right wing delusion.