Charles is King of 15 countries - but for how much longer?

[youreavinalaff]

1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:

You mean the pieces of string keeping the banners together during the transportation?

Nothing says scared, weak and corrupt government like the banning of bits of string.

Selective reading once again. You're quite good at it. One of the best on here.

[kwilco]

3 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Who ever said it was?

 

You've taken part of my post and quoted it out of context to suit your own agenda.

I cannot respect anyone who uses the word "agenda" in their posts.

[youreavinalaff]

Just now, kwilco said:

I cannot respect anyone who uses the word "agenda" in their posts.

That's fine by me. 

 

The feeling is mutual.????????????????

[Mac Mickmanus]

3 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

You mean the pieces of string keeping the banners together during the transportation?

Nothing says scared, weak and corrupt government like the banning of bits of string.

I didn't mean the pieces of string keeping the banners together during transportation, no 

[RuamRudy]

12 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Selective reading once again. You're quite good at it. One of the best on here.

Tell me where the selective reading is. Be specific because frequently, when you are challenged, you fall back on this device.

[RuamRudy]

10 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I didn't mean the pieces of string keeping the banners together during transportation, no 

Then to which straps are you referring? The banners were held together with string. What else is so scary to the state?

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:

Then to which straps are you referring? The banners were held together with string. What else is so scary to the state?

The info is in the link I provided 

Here is the link again which contains that info 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65507435

[RayC]

54 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

There have been reports of protesters in amongst the well wishers. That was not in Trafalgar Square. There are also reports of protesters going through road blocks.  Neither were authorised by the police.

A handful of protesters among thousands of people who have an opposing view. Yep, a real threat to the rule of law. In any event, (1) they were removed (perhaps for their own safety) (2) it doesn't explain why protesters were arrested at the location where it was agreed that they could congregate. Unless, of course, you believe that possession of a few straps should be a criminal offence.

 

54 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

 

Let's face it, their plan was to disrupt. If that was not their plan, they would have chosen another day.

Did you miss the bit in the link you posted where it stated;:

 

"(Graham Smith) told BBC Radio Leeds that Republic "certainly have no intention of actually disrupting" the proceedings.

 

"We will be very visible, we will be loud, we will be hard to miss, but the procession and the plans for the coronation will go ahead uninterrupted by us.""?

Edited May 6, 2023 by RayC
Correction

[youreavinalaff]

40 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Tell me where the selective reading is. Be specific because frequently, when you are challenged, you fall back on this device.

 

39 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Then to which straps are you referring? The banners were held together with string. What else is so scary to the state?

There you go. The article clearly stated "straps". You missed it or, more likely, chose to ignore it.

[youreavinalaff]

7 minutes ago, RayC said:

A handful of protesters among thousands of people who have an opposing view. Yep, a real threat to the rule of law. In any event, (1) they were removed (perhaps for their own safety) (2) it doesn't explain why protesters were arrested at the location where it was agreed that they could congregate. Unless, of course, you believe that possession of a few straps should be a criminal offence.

 

Did you miss the bit in the link you posted where it stated;:

 

"(Graham Smith) told BBC Radio Leeds that Republic "certainly have no intention of actually disrupting" the proceedings.

 

"We will be very visible, we will be loud, we will be hard to miss, but the procession and the plans for the coronation will go ahead uninterrupted by us.""?

You are correct. They were uninterrupted as protesters were moved on for stepping over the line.

[kwilco]

54 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

That's fine by me. 

 

The feeling is mutual.????????????????

you can't too? - curious.

[youreavinalaff]

Just now, kwilco said:

you can't too? - curious.

Your question is the most curious thing if read so far.

[kwilco]

1 minute ago, youreavinalaff said:

Your question is the most curious thing if read so far.

Somehow, I'm not surprised

Which question was that?

[youreavinalaff]

4 minutes ago, kwilco said:

Somehow, I'm not surprised

Which question was that?

 

6 minutes ago, kwilco said:

you can't too?

This one.

[RayC]

25 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

You are correct. They were uninterrupted as protesters were moved on for stepping over the line.

That line being possession of a few straps and a padlock?

 

We can all sleep safely tonight.

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 minute ago, RayC said:

That line being possession of a few straps and a padlock?

 

We can all sleep safely tonight.

Yes, due the Police action the protestors were not able to disrupt the Coronation 

[youreavinalaff]

2 minutes ago, RayC said:

That line being possession of a few straps and a padlock?

 

We can all sleep safely tonight.

And being nearer to the route than they said, mingling with onlookers with megaphones and ignoring road blocks.

[Mac Mickmanus]

45 minutes ago, RayC said:

A handful of protesters among thousands of people who have an opposing view. Yep, a real threat to the rule of law. In any event, (1) they were removed (perhaps for their own safety) (2) it doesn't explain why protesters were arrested at the location where it was agreed that they could congregate. Unless, of course, you believe that possession of a few straps should be a criminal offence.

 

Did you miss the bit in the link you posted where it stated;:

 

"(Graham Smith) told BBC Radio Leeds that Republic "certainly have no intention of actually disrupting" the proceedings.

 

"We will be very visible, we will be loud, we will be hard to miss, but the procession and the plans for the coronation will go ahead uninterrupted by us.""?

You are paying way too much attention to this and giving much more importance that what it actually is .

  A few disruptive people were stopped from causing a disruption .

   That is all there is to this story .

All the mentions of North Korea and fascists is ridiculous .

A few trouble makers were stopped from causing trouble .

Its really no big deal 

[xylophone]

52 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Yes, due the Police action the protestors were not able to disrupt the Coronation 

And it's all over and done with now.....GB has a king who talks to trees and called the late Queen "Mummy" even when he was in his sixties, and Camilla has her own personal King sized tampon. Sorted.

[Mac Mickmanus]

14 minutes ago, xylophone said:

And it's all over and done with now.....GB has a king who talks to trees and called the late Queen "Mummy" even when he was in his sixties, and Camilla has her own personal King sized tampon. Sorted.

Calling his Mother MUMMY !!!!!!!!!!

Shocking ????

[RayC]

1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Yes, due the Police action the protestors were not able to disrupt the Coronation 

 

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

And being nearer to the route than they said, mingling with onlookers with megaphones and ignoring road blocks.

Having reread the reports, I've changed my mind. Just as well the police intervened. Who knows what this protest could have led to: Petrograd? Kristallnacht?

 

A narrow escape indeed.

[RayC]

1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You are paying way too much attention to this and giving much more importance that what it actually is .

  A few disruptive people were stopped from causing a disruption .

   That is all there is to this story .

All the mentions of North Korea and fascists is ridiculous .

A few trouble makers were stopped from causing trouble .

Its really no big deal 

It's no big deal if you don't value free speech and the ability to protest peacefully.

[Mac Mickmanus]

24 minutes ago, RayC said:

It's no big deal if you don't value free speech and the ability to protest peacefully.

Everyone can still say what they want and you can still peacefully protest , just that the disruptive trouble makers today got told to go somewhere else to shout and scream and throw things about 

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

Having reread the reports, I've changed my mind. Just as well the police intervened. Who knows what this protest could have led to: Petrograd? Kristallnacht?

 

A narrow escape indeed.

No, no one was concerned about there being a full blown riot and civil unrest .

   They simply wanted to stop a few loud mouthed unruly people disrupting the coronation , that's all they wanted to do .

  We aren't talking about a revolution or the Army talking control of the streets  .

[RayC]

58 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Everyone can still say what they want and you can still peacefully protest , just that the disruptive trouble makers today got told to go somewhere else to shout and scream and throw things about 

What's the point of a protest if there is no one there to hear your message?

[Mac Mickmanus]

8 minutes ago, RayC said:

What's the point of a protest if there is no one there to hear your message?

They did indeed cause a disruption , but they had to cause a disruption in an area away from the main procession and so not to stop the coronation .

   And the people there for the coronation drowned out the protesters message by shouting louder than they did in retaliation 

 

 

[RuamRudy]

8 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

 

There you go. The article clearly stated "straps". You missed it or, more likely, chose to ignore it.

I didn't ignore it - I asked for clarification. What are straps? How are they defined? 

[RuamRudy]

4 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

No, no one was concerned about there being a full blown riot and civil unrest .

   They simply wanted to stop a few loud mouthed unruly people disrupting the coronation , that's all they wanted to do .

  We aren't talking about a revolution or the Army talking control of the streets  .

But we are talking about the right to freedom of speech being removed by a right wing government and being enacted upon by a disgraced and untrusted police force.

[transam]

12 hours ago, RayC said:

Trafalgar Square is a mile from Westminster Abbey. It is not on the procession route. If you were there specifically for the coronation then you probably wouldn't have come into contact with the protesters unless you went out of your way to confront them.

Then why did these anti-Brits low-life waste their time not at the Coronation, all they did was use up police resources.........????.................????

[transam]

10 hours ago, kwilco said:

I cannot respect anyone who uses the word "agenda" in their posts.

But you have an agenda ......Pot/kettle................