Liverpool Lou Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 13 minutes ago, Jingthing said: 14 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: How could you know whether that is the case? The FBI knows. Oh, yes, that paragon of virtue and veracity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 41 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said: Nah -- there's folks on here saying Biden might need it. But when pressed on what basis they say their ‘dog ate their whistleblower’. 1 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 (edited) 34 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said: He did not declassify the documents he had in his possession at MaraLago I am afraid. Your view and backstopping of the truth you believe is not the same as true life events. I will agree to disagree with what you think. The President himself does not have wide sweeping declassification powers. To many security issues in those documents which need to be removed or redacted. At the time Trump was Potus, he enjoyed the same rights as any other Potus. Thats difficult for the left to accept imop "The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, said that such authority gives the president the authority to "classify and declassify at will." https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/ Edited May 20, 2023 by riclag 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 1 minute ago, riclag said: At the time Trump was Potus, he enjoyed the same rights as any other Potus. "The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, said that such authority gives the president the authority to "classify and declassify at will." https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/ But claiming to have declassified documents without out any evidence of having done so and only making that claim when no longer in office? Oh…. And after first claiming somebody planted the classified documents! I think Jack Smith can work it out. 2 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Mist Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 Reported off topic posts removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerrymahoney Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: But when pressed on what basis they say their ‘dog ate their whistleblower’. They'll find something else like always. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: But claiming to have declassified documents without out any evidence of having done so and only making that claim when no longer in office? Oh…. And after first claiming somebody planted the classified documents! I think Jack Smith can work it out. Anyway, even if they were declassified, they would still be considered sensitive and trump would have no right to keep them. What's more there's very strong evidence that he lied to the justice department about being possession of them. That would be called obstruction of justice. Edited May 20, 2023 by placeholder 5 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: But claiming to have declassified documents without out any evidence of having done so and only making that claim when no longer in office? Oh…. And after first claiming somebody planted the classified documents! I think Jack Smith can work it out. Smith has a so many targets it must be very hard to decide where to focus. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 1 minute ago, placeholder said: Anyway, even if they were declassified, they would still be considered sensitive and trump would have no right to keep them. What's more there's very strong evidence that he lied to the justice department about being possession of them. That would be called obstruction of justice. Yes I will be very surprised if he's not charged with obstruction of justice which of course is a very serious crime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 17 minutes ago, riclag said: At the time Trump was Potus, he enjoyed the same rights as any other Potus. Thats difficult for the left to accept imop "The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, said that such authority gives the president the authority to "classify and declassify at will." https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/ Even in case you were right, it would not have much impact. None of the three criminal statutes evoked in his case requires the material to be classified. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post LosLobo Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 3 hours ago, jerrymahoney said: I think the Secret Service -- who has obligation to provide protection to any former President for life -- will get have a say in any prison issue. But I'm not sure -- I'll have to check how they handled it when any other former President was convicted of a felony that would normally incur jail time. Protection? I am sure the Secret Service won't be have a problem supplying condoms. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 18 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: But claiming to have declassified documents without out any evidence of having done so and only making that claim when no longer in office? Oh…. And after first claiming somebody planted the classified documents! I think Jack Smith can work it out. Wrong again Jan 19, 2021 declassification memo He was still in office! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post xylophone Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 1 hour ago, 2009 said: How is it a cult? Amazing, so being patriotic is a cult? Better tell that to most countries. ???? I think you've confused the difference between being a Patriot and a Dumbo who believes the myriad of lies which have been propagated by trump. 4 2 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 6 minutes ago, riclag said: Wrong again Jan 19, 2021 declassification memo He was still in office! So people if you add one plus one such as the declassification memo and classify and declassify at will together, a rational person would think Trump was acting within his Presidential Powers rights afforded to him by the Constitution. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 (edited) 30 minutes ago, riclag said: Wrong again Jan 19, 2021 declassification memo He was still in office! Actually, it's you who are wrong again. The declassification memo referred to references the FBI's crossfire hurricane investigation and even then is only partial. No reference in there to a general declassification. Edited May 20, 2023 by placeholder 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lacessit Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 27 minutes ago, xylophone said: I think you've confused the difference between being a Patriot and a Dumbo who believes the myriad of lies which have been propagated by trump. IIRC it was Samuel Johnson who said patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 2 hours ago, vandeventer said: Trump had every right to those documents as President Really? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-mar-a-lago-classified-documents-evidence-b2342010.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 2 hours ago, bignok said: So you think they ring around before any case has even been heard. That is absurd. 100% logistics will be considered as soon as possible. Already, or now? Maybe not, but hardly absurd. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 2 hours ago, 2009 said: Should be 50/50 really. No. It should reflect the opinion of the society, which may not be 50/50. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2009 Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 45 minutes ago, mikebike said: No. It should reflect the opinion of the society, which may not be 50/50. I think when it's political, like this - bearing in mind he's the ex president and he's running again - it would be sensible for a 50/50 split. I mean the timing of all this is just perfect for the democrats right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 A baiting troll post along with an unsubstantiated claim removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 15 minutes ago, 2009 said: I think when it's political, like this - bearing in mind he's the ex president and he's running again - it would be sensible for a 50/50 split. I mean the timing of all this is just perfect for the democrats right? If the timing of this is in fact perfect for the Democrats, Trump has only himself to thank. His lawyers have done everything they could to delay the investigations. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 15 minutes ago, 2009 said: I think when it's political, like this - bearing in mind he's the ex president and he's running again - it would be sensible for a 50/50 split. I mean the timing of all this is just perfect for the democrats right? So you would prefer that the makeup of the jury NOT reflect the makeup of society. Interesting. ???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 2 hours ago, riclag said: Wrong again Jan 19, 2021 declassification memo He was still in office! That’s excellent news ricelag, a document, with details that can be checked and compared with the formal records. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: That’s excellent news ricelag, a document, with details that can be checked and compared with the formal records. Here in fact is the linik to that document. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202100044/pdf/DCPD-202100044.pdf As you'll note, it refers only to Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI Russia-Trump investigation. What's more, it's not even absolute but recognizes that certain documents could be exempt due to national security considerations. But what makes riclag's citing of this document especially bizarre is that it is, in fact, a document. In other words, it's written. Apparently, Trump didn't believe that a mere verbal authorization was sufficient. And once again, keep in mind that even if Trump's claims to declassifying were strong, as the 3 judge panel that undid the appointment of a special master noted, that claim was a red herring. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post earlinclaifornia Posted May 20, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2023 3 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said: How could you know whether that is the case? Your posting makes me believe you have not kept up with the news and if you knew me I always know his supporters are the last ones to realize the current news. 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 1 hour ago, placeholder said: Here in fact is the linik to that document. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202100044/pdf/DCPD-202100044.pdf As you'll note, it refers only to Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI Russia-Trump investigation. What's more, it's not even absolute but recognizes that certain documents could be exempt due to national security considerations. But what makes riclag's citing of this document especially bizarre is that it is, in fact, a document. In other words, it's written. Apparently, Trump didn't believe that a mere verbal authorization was sufficient. And once again, keep in mind that even if Trump's claims to declassifying were strong, as the 3 judge panel that undid the appointment of a special master noted, that claim was a red herring. Exactly. There nothing in the memo suggesting that it may apply to the MAL documents. The usual right-wing confusion tactic... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 4 hours ago, riclag said: Wrong again Jan 19, 2021 declassification memo He was still in office! Really? I was under the impression that Trump's last day in office was the morning of January 6th 2020. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 A post commenting on moderation has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, billd766 said: Really? I was under the impression that Trump's last day in office was the morning of January 6th 2020. Election at the end of 2020, final days in office January 2021. Edited May 20, 2023 by stevenl 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now