webfact Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 A member of the Thai Senate says other names could be put forward for the PM role and that the Move Forward leader doesn’t have to be the sole candidate. His comment is actually reiterating what would actually happen for the nomination and election of a prime minister under Thailand’s 2017 constitution. According to a Bangkok Post report, Akanit Muensawad says if additional candidates are nominated for the top job, senators are not required to vote for Pita Limjaroenrat. The senator was responding to Move Forward supporters, who are piling pressure on senators not to thwart Pita’s bid for PM. Akanit says if more names are put forward for the role, senators can vote for the person they think is best suited, in terms of both capability and ethics. By Peter Roche Full story: https://phuket-go.com/phuket-news/national-news/senator-suggests-pita-doesnt-have-to-be-the-only-pm-candidate/ -- © Copyright Phuket GO 2023-06-26 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.
Popular Post hughrection Posted June 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted June 26, 2023 This 'senator' is a general who isn't happy about Future Forward controlling the army budget and expenditure as well as banning conscription. Of course, he is impartial - Not! ???? 5 1
Popular Post stubuzz Posted June 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted June 26, 2023 19 minutes ago, webfact said: Akanit says if more names are put forward for the role, senators can vote for the person they think is best suited, in terms of both capability and ethics. Didn't the Thai people just do this? 2 1 4 2
h90 Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 19 minutes ago, stubuzz said: Didn't the Thai people just do this? yes and no party got an majority....62% of the voter did not vote for MF 1 1
Popular Post BenStark Posted June 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted June 26, 2023 41 minutes ago, webfact said: A member of the Thai Senate says other names could be put forward for the PM role and that the Move Forward leader doesn’t have to be the sole candidate. As I see our local army stooge has already entered the thread, any suggestions for other candiates? Prawit - Prayut? 3
ikke1959 Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 Other candidates, more investigations, more delay, more chance to ban MFP??? All tricks they try to play.. 1
klauskunkel Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 1 hour ago, webfact said: Akanit says if more names are put forward for the role, senators can vote for the person they think is the most reliable to make them money.
Popular Post khunjeff Posted June 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted June 26, 2023 2 hours ago, webfact said: senators can vote for the person they think is best suited, in terms of both capability and ethics. Neither capability nor ethics was a consideration when the senators themselves were voted for...oh, my mistake, they weren't voted for at all... 2 1
Srikcir Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 3 hours ago, webfact said: senators can vote for the person they think is best suited, in terms of both capability and ethics. Like when they voted for Prayut after the 2019 election?
hotchilli Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 4 hours ago, webfact said: A member of the Thai Senate says other names could be put forward for the PM role and that the Move Forward leader doesn’t have to be the sole candidate. Said member should remain quiet.
kingstonkid Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 4 hours ago, BenStark said: As I see our local army stooge has already entered the thread, any suggestions for other candiates? Prawit - Prayut? Simple solution if pita is a no go is to nominate prawit. It may sound strange but there is no legal way he could survive a vote of no confidence. Meaning PT does not get thaksin home nor do they get power. Prawit would be a straw man because he can not get a budget passed or any real legislation.
bannork Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 4 hours ago, h90 said: yes and no party got an majority....62% of the voter did not vote for MF Let's look at the number of votes for Party List MPs in the last election: MF - 14,438,851 PT- 10,962, 524 UTNP( Prayuth)- 4,766,408 Bhumjaithai - 1,138,202 Democrats- 925, 349 Prachachart ( Southern Party) -602,645 Palang Pracharat ( Pravit) -537625 So if we take the proposed coalition we have MF, PT and Prachachart, totalling over 26 million votes Military backed parties total over 7 million votes Number of votes for senators- 0.0 recurring. 26 million to 7 million
h90 Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 6 minutes ago, bannork said: Let's look at the number of votes for Party List MPs in the last election: MF - 14,438,851 PT- 10,962, 524 UTNP( Prayuth)- 4,766,408 Bhumjaithai - 1,138,202 Democrats- 925, 349 Prachachart ( Southern Party) -602,645 Palang Pracharat ( Pravit) -537625 So if we take the proposed coalition we have MF, PT and Prachachart, totalling over 26 million votes Military backed parties total over 7 million votes Number of votes for senators- 0.0 recurring. 26 million to 7 million yes but you can't just add all other parties to MF....PT can form a majority without MF. And they'll happily do it if they get an excuse for doing it. 1
zzaa09 Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 Before all this sorted mess is said and done, I've a strong feeling that someone is going to intervene and declare it all nil and void - select a temporary interim government until a new election can be settled upon. Just a hunch. Damn the will of the people.
bannork Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 8 minutes ago, h90 said: yes but you can't just add all other parties to MF....PT can form a majority without MF. And they'll happily do it if they get an excuse for doing it. Not easy for them to do that. They campaigned as a party supporting democracy against military interference in politics. Teaming up with Prayuth's or Pravit's parties could see a major backlash against them. Impossible to justify to the public 1
bamnutsak Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 It is amazing that unelected Senators are interfering in the formation of a government, by publicly speaking about whatever happens to lurch into their brains. 5 hours ago, webfact said: Akanit says if more names are put forward for the role, senators can vote for the person they think is best suited, in terms of both capability and ethics. General Akanit Muansawad is close to sedition in his attempts to influence who gets nominated for PM. His job as an appointed Senator is to debate candidates IN SESSION, and vote.
bamnutsak Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 34 minutes ago, bannork said: 26 million to 7 million Thanks for highlighting the lopsidedness of the election, and the resounding stomping of the legacy military parties (the Dems are toast) by MFP and PTP. 1 1
bannork Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 7 minutes ago, bamnutsak said: Thanks for highlighting the lopsidedness of the election, and the resounding stomping of the legacy military parties (the Dems are toast) by MFP and PTP. Talking of the Dems, I see Abhisit and Korn are being mentioned as potential leaders but both are from Bangkok whilst nearly all their 25 MPs are from the South. 1
Sydebolle Posted June 26, 2023 Posted June 26, 2023 C'est le ton qui fait la musique! The senator is absolutely right in saying "..... other names could ........ be put forward ..... and the Move Forward leader doesn’t have to be the sole candidate". The statement is correct so best we leave it to the MFP people who got elected to sort out that problem as they will have to chose the leader under whom they want to work. But, as said, the rhetoric has changed in the right direction! 1
UbonEagle Posted June 27, 2023 Posted June 27, 2023 You’re out of a job next year you fraud, don’t let the door hit you on the way out
arithai12 Posted June 28, 2023 Posted June 28, 2023 On 6/26/2023 at 11:46 AM, stubuzz said: Didn't the Thai people just do this? No they didn't. The ballot didn't say "who do you want as PM", and even if it did Move Forward didn't win an absolute majority. Anyway, it's just common sense that there should be more than one option on the table for PM.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now