Senator asks his peers to support Pita for PM

[webfact]

File photo

A senator issued an open letter on Saturday asking his fellow senators to vote for Move Forward leader Pita Limjaroenrat as the next prime minister during the joint sitting on Thursday.

 

Vudhibhandhu Vichairatana wrote, in what he called his second open letter, that he would follow the instructions of HM the King, given at the inauguration ceremony of the lower House last week, to carry out his duties for the benefit of the country’s stability and of the people.

 

He said there may be strong and wide criticism concerning the suitability of an individual, that is just a part of freedom of expression. There have, however, been opinions expressed which are not appropriate and based on bias.

 

#news

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/senator-asks-his-peers-to-support-pita-for-pm/

 

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2023-07-10

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

[hotchilli]

One with a conscience,

I wonder how many will "not" do as the King asked?

[Markon]

Sensible plea.

[nikmar]

".......should perform their duties with honesty, for the benefit of people and the country and without conflict of interest."

 

without conflict of interest? Both Prayut and Prawit have brothers in the Senate. How is that not a conflict of interest?

[sirineou]

Why do they even have general elections?

[jacko45k]

1 minute ago, sirineou said:

Why do they even have general elections?

The irony... to elect a General?

[Denim]

An honest senator , rare as hens teeth. The fact that his social circle might now evaporate somewhat shouldn't  bother him since the more self interested senators are not worthy of any attention. 

[watchcat]

3 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Why do they even have general elections?

Good question.

[Caldera]

Hopefully a sufficient number of his colleagues will see the light.

 

There's no shame in being appointed to the senate by the military, unless you let them make you their pet.

[WHansen]

Well done sir, i applaud you.

[Eric Loh]

37 minutes ago, Caldera said:

Hopefully a sufficient number of his colleagues will see the light.

 

There's no shame in being appointed to the senate by the military, unless you let them make you their pet.

We will soon know which of his colleagues will not heed the instruction from the King. The voting is based on open ballot system and participant's choices are not confidential and it will be telecast live. 

[pegman]

My gut feeling is a sufficient number of senators will abstain so Pita will be elected as Prime Minister. 

[scorecard]

9 minutes ago, pegman said:

My gut feeling is a sufficient number of senators will abstain so Pita will be elected as Prime Minister. 

If a senator abstains is that taken as a YES vote?

[Eric Loh]

5 minutes ago, pegman said:

My gut feeling is a sufficient number of senators will abstain so Pita will be elected as Prime Minister. 

Abstaining by large number of senators will not help Pita. The voting process under the Organic Law 2017 require the prime ministerial candidate to secure a majority of 376 of 750 votes. The Secretariate of the House will call out the names of the MPs and Senators and they can vote as approve, dissaprove or abstain. 

[MikeN]

10 minutes ago, pegman said:

My gut feeling is a sufficient number of senators will abstain so Pita will be elected as Prime Minister. 

If they abstain that is effectively a no vote...the new PM needs a majority of the 750 eligible votes from MPs and senators, so 376 no matter how many actually vote.

[h90]

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Abstaining by large number of senators will not help Pita. The voting process under the Organic Law 2017 require the prime ministerial candidate to secure a majority of 376 of 750 votes. The Secretariate of the House will call out the names of the MPs and Senators and they can vote as approve, dissaprove or abstain. 

Interesting...do I understand 376 votes are needed....if say some Democrat is on sick leave (or hiding in the toilet (another country)) (to avoid taking side) it is equal to a no vote?

Or lets say 1 MFP MP is really sick than they still need 376 and not 375, right?

Would mean there is no "abstain" as an abstain is equal to no....Interesting....don't know what I should think about that.

 

[MikeandDow]

30 minutes ago, h90 said:

Interesting...do I understand 376 votes are needed....if say some Democrat is on sick leave (or hiding in the toilet (another country)) (to avoid taking side) it is equal to a no vote?

Or lets say 1 MFP MP is really sick than they still need 376 and not 375, right?

Would mean there is no "abstain" as an abstain is equal to no....Interesting....don't know what I should think about that.

 

Abstention from voting is a form of exercising one's right to vote. When someone confirms that they are abstaining from voting, it means they are voting neither for nor against the motion at hand. They are nevertheless taking part in the election through expressing neither approval nor disapproval for a particular candidate, party or motion.

 

he need 376votes  from MP or senators

[scorecard]

1 hour ago, MikeandDow said:

Abstention from voting is a form of exercising one's right to vote. When someone confirms that they are abstaining from voting, it means they are voting neither for nor against the motion at hand. They are nevertheless taking part in the election through expressing neither approval nor disapproval for a particular candidate, party or motion.

 

he need 376votes  from MP or senators

Copied from above, this is also my understanding re abstain (checked by google search).  " When someone confirms that they are abstaining from voting, it means they are voting neither for nor against the motion at hand. They are nevertheless taking part in the election through expressing neither approval nor disapproval for a particular candidate, party or motion."

 

 

[PETERTHEEATER]

6 hours ago, sirineou said:

Why do they even have general elections?

To elect Generals of course. It avoids having a coup. ????

[Artisi]

9 hours ago, nikmar said:

".......should perform their duties with honesty, for the benefit of people and the country and without conflict of interest."

 

without conflict of interest? Both Prayut and Prawit have brothers in the Senate. How is that not a conflict of interest?

But that's different as they don't hold any interest in media ownership (that we know of)... 

[BangkokReady]

15 hours ago, webfact said:

He said there may be strong and wide criticism concerning the suitability of an individual, that is just a part of freedom of expression.

Thailand has freedom of expression?

[anchadian]

Junta-appointed senator Amphon Jondawattana said on Mon he will vote for Pita as PM on Thurs & it's not about the individual but about respecting the will of the people. Amphon added MFP's pledge to amend the lese majeste law is a matter of the legislative branch.

 

https://twitter.com/KhaosodEnglish/status/1678302360085614592

[eisfeld]

6 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

Abstention from voting is a form of exercising one's right to vote. When someone confirms that they are abstaining from voting, it means they are voting neither for nor against the motion at hand. They are nevertheless taking part in the election through expressing neither approval nor disapproval for a particular candidate, party or motion.

 

he need 376votes  from MP or senators

If a quorum is defined by needing a certain number of votes from eligible voters then voting abstain or no has the exact same effect because the outcome is dictated by "voted yes" or "didn't vote yes". Both abstain and "no" fall under "didn't vote yes". If instead in a voting system the quorum is defined by the number of yes votes from the total number of votes then abstain would have a different meaning.

[MikeandDow]

7 minutes ago, eisfeld said:

If a quorum is defined by needing a certain number of votes from eligible voters then voting abstain or no has the exact same effect because the outcome is dictated by "voted yes" or "didn't vote yes". Both abstain and "no" fall under "didn't vote yes". If instead in a voting system the quorum is defined by the number of yes votes from the total number of votes then abstain would have a different meaning.

not intrested mate you are reading too much into it