Jump to content

Trump trial in Fulton County will be televised, judge says


Social Media

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

comic relief in these dark days. Democracy in this age? You must be havin' a laff. We have something labelled "democracy" but it's not actual "democracy",

Yep, not "actual" democracy, by the look of Trump still at liberty to tweet and slander... However, that's no excuse for lawlessness, as some might fervently hope. And by the way things are going lately, yes, we are "havin' a laff"  - "dark days" indeed.

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

If just a few of them actually see the light and jump the fence that would be worth it. Same as the vaccine argument. Nobody cares about the die hards.

Does it actually work though ?

How many people do you know that have switched to the Left after you accused them of being a Nazi ?

Edited by Nick Carter icp
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

I think what poster Ozimoron meant by ‘jumping the fence’ is that even a nazi can decide to stop being a nazi and become a decent human being again. That's not equal to automatically becoming a lefty. You just chose to understand it as being totally black or white with nothing in between: if you aren’t a lefty, then you are a nazi.

You seem to have misunderstood my point .

I was giving other peoples opinion , rather than my own 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, watthong said:

Lucky for us mere mortals, Mark Meadows does not make laws. Per common sense, the reserve should be the law:  it only takes one decision that Meadows was NOT performing in his official capacity to DIS-qualify for removal.

But this IS the law in Georgia:

 

637 F.Supp.3d 1316
United States District Court,
N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

 

The State of GEORGIA, Plaintiff,
v.
Eric A. HEINZE and Kristopher
L. Hutchens, Defendants.

 

Footnote 8:

 

“It is well settled that if one claim cognizable under Section 1442 is present, the entire action is removed, regardless of
the relationship between the Section 1442 claim and the non-removable claims.”

 

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Georgia-v-Heinze.pdf

 

 

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...