https://brownstone.org/articles/researchers-alarmed-to-find-dna-contamination-in-pfizer-vaccine/

Quote from the article's introduction:

Phillip Buckhaults, a cancer genomics expert, and professor at the University of South Carolina has testified before a South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee saying that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine is contaminated with billions of tiny DNA fragments.

Buckhaults, who has a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology, said “there is a very real hazard” that these fragments of foreign DNA can insert themselves into a person’s own genome and become a “permanent fixture of the cell.”

He said it’s a plausible mechanism for what might be “causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest” in people following mRNA vaccination.

= = =

Note that Buckhaults is a staunch fan of the mRNA platform and is fully vaccinated, but he reluctantly addressed the issue at the Committee hearing and made it clear that he would not be taking any boosters before he had personally tested the content of the vial (which only requires a cheap and quick test).  Obviously, if the boosters do contain that DNA contamination there is an enormous problem.  

Not even to mention, all the earlier jabs that were administered containing that DNA contamination.  The contamination problem was created when Pfizer upscaled the process for large-scale distribution to the population...

So what's it going to be?   Superfluous third nipple or some form of superpower?

 

Sorry everyone, we accidentally activated some "junk" DNA and now you will all self rejuvenate indefinitely, and grow a third nipple.

 

 

Those pesky democrap DNA samples... they will do anything to create votes.

That's alarming to see - but DNA isn't all bad.

 

This Company has a DNA based vaccine for Covid that in trials showed NO side effects and gave good protection against new variants - Scancell Ltd and 'Covidity'.

 

Covidity sits on the shelf while the USA/UK/Europe hurtle along the mRNA vaccine route with all it's known drawbacks, including cost !

 

Scancell is a cancer vaccine specialist achieving good coverage atm by improving the 'standard of care' for melanoma.

 

 

 

The more time passes....the more info comes out...the more I am very glad i did NOT fall for taking an MRNA vaccine.....I feel sorry for those that did. They simply dont know the long term consequences...and it aint looking great so far. 

On 9/22/2023 at 1:57 PM, 248900_1469958220 said:

The more time passes....the more info comes out...the more I am very glad i did NOT fall for taking an MRNA vaccine.....I feel sorry for those that did. They simply dont know the long term consequences...and it aint looking great so far. 

Yet, in the US possibly 200,000 people died from not 'taking an (sic) MRNA vaccine' and become contenders for the Darwin Award. 

 

An award to honour those who voluntarily contributed to human evolution by removing their DNA from the human gene pool.

A question worth asking is : How long are these little time-bombs going to last inside people's bodies and what is likely to be their effect over a scale of decades?

 

Most of Europe is seeing overall excess mortality in the 25-49 age group running in the region of 10-20%, and as if that were bad enough, the figures show no sign of returning to normal.

 

Spain, for example, has been recording excess mortality of 11% or more for 12 consecutive quarters - 3 years non-stop - according to Eurostat data.

 

The silence from governments is deafening.

14 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

A question worth asking is : How long are these little time-bombs going to last inside people's bodies and what is likely to be their effect over a scale of decades?

In all the research papers I have seen that tried to determine the answer to the question how long your body's production of spike-proteins goes on after you have taken the mRNA jab, they were not able to give a conclusive answer.  The reason being that there were still spike-proteins found at the end of each of those study's time-horizon.  So, it's minimum 6 months and possibly for as long as you (still) live...

Anyone who accepts the findings of a single researcher is gullible.

 

This may be true or this guy's lab may be contaminated. Time will tell.

TBH, I think this is a bit of a red herring.

 

According to my information, only certain batches of the vax, actually had ingredients that were not harmful. There simply couldn't be a situation where everyone, who had the jab, was falling sick. The boosters were the same. Sooner or later anyone having a series of jabs - through sheer probability - will fall sick.

 

https://www.howbadismybatch.com

 

All these jabs carry some risk. I've read a couple of articles, that strongly suggest that the ingredients of the more toxic ones, could stay in the body for a lifetime.

 

There are ways for the body to rid itself of some toxins. But beyond the scope of this thread.

 

 

14 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

No Link, as it was an obvious satirical response to @LosLobo's (equally not linked) nonsense post. 

Because 200,000 people didn't die from the vaccine, they died from not taking the vaccine.

10 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

TBH, I think this is a bit of a red herring.

 

According to my information, only certain batches of the vax, actually had ingredients that were not harmful. There simply couldn't be a situation where everyone, who had the jab, was falling sick. The boosters were the same. Sooner or later anyone having a series of jabs - through sheer probability - will fall sick.

 

https://www.howbadismybatch.com

 

All these jabs carry some risk. I've read a couple of articles, that strongly suggest that the ingredients of the more toxic ones, could stay in the body for a lifetime.

 

There are ways for the body to rid itself of some toxins. But beyond the scope of this thread.

 

 

You have any proof of your allegations?

28 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Because 200,000 people didn't die from the vaccine, they died from not taking the vaccine.

Do you really believe that?

 

What killed these people that didn't take the jab? A computer programme from Imperial College?

1 minute ago, owl sees all said:

Do you really believe that?

 

What killed these people that didn't take the jab? A computer programme from Imperial College?

A virus called Covid-19.

 

Did you know that over a million Americans died from it?

4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

A virus called Covid-19.

 

Did you know that over a million Americans died from it?

Not only didn't I know, but I don't believe it.

 

You are certainly a MSM champion.

Even the CDC has finally admitted that vaccinated people are at higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than the unvaccinated population.

 

And yet, some people (thankfully a lot less than before) are still lining up to get jabbed. Will they ever wake up?

 

BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines.

https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/whats-new/covid-19-variant.html

2 hours ago, owl sees all said:

Not only didn't I know, but I don't believe it.

 

You are certainly a MSM champion.

It was observed and proven by science not the MSM.  Even I don't blindly trust the MSM.

3 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

A virus called Covid-19.

 

Did you know that over a million Americans died from it?

Over a million Americans died with it.  We'll never know how many actually died from it.

 

46 minutes ago, rabas said:

No. 

 

The CDC nowhere compares anything to unvaxxed people or admits what you say. Had you read your own link, they actually say:

Immune Impacts: The large number of mutations in this variant raises concerns of greater escape from existing immunity from vaccines and previous infections compared with other recent variants.  (not unvaxxed)

 

Worse, the CDC even warns the public about people like yourself making such misinterpretations.  See Clarification at the bottom.

 

You misread it.

 

Immune Impacts: The large number of mutations in this variant raises concerns of greater escape from existing immunity from vaccines and previous infections compared with other recent variants.

 

This means "concerns of greater excape if you have had Covid or been vaccinated", period. 

 

Their "clarification" is pathetic. I love the use of the term "Suggest". Is that like their initial "suggestion" that vaccination offered 90%+ immunity? Laughable.

9 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

You misread it.

 

Immune Impacts: The large number of mutations in this variant raises concerns of greater escape from existing immunity from vaccines and previous infections compared with other recent variants.

 

This means "concerns of greater excape if you have had Covid or been vaccinated", period. 

 

Their "clarification" is pathetic. I love the use of the term "Suggest". Is that like their initial "suggestion" that vaccination offered 90%+ immunity? Laughable.

None of what the CDC is doing even remotely justifies your statement

"Even the CDC has finally admitted that vaccinated people are at higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than the unvaccinated population.".

40 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Immune Impacts: The large number of mutations in this variant raises concerns of greater escape from existing immunity from vaccines and previous infections compared with other recent variants.

 

This means "concerns of greater excape if you have had Covid or been vaccinated", period. 

And that in no way means or supports your initial misinformation claim, in your words:

 

'the CDC has finally admitted that vaccinated people are at higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than the unvaccinated population.'

 

No. The CDC did not say that, admit that, nor is it true according to science. Not even close. Kindly refrain from such claims without proof.

 

4 minutes ago, rabas said:

And that in no way means or supports your initial misinformation claim, in your words:

 

'the CDC has finally admitted that vaccinated people are at higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than the unvaccinated population.'

 

No. The CDC did not say that, admit that, nor is it true according to science. Not even close. Kindly refrain from such claims without proof.

Yes it does.

Just now, rattlesnake said:

Yes it does.

Provide links and proof it is true.

 

32 minutes ago, stevenl said:

None of what the CDC is doing even remotely justifies your statement

"Even the CDC has finally admitted that vaccinated people are at higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than the unvaccinated population.".

Yes it does, but I don't expect vax zealots to acknowledge it.

Never mind about the CDC.

 

If anyone has had the jab, they are more likely to get vax-related illnesses than the un-jabbed. Maybe death too.

 

 

1 hour ago, impulse said:

Over a million Americans died with it.  We'll never know how many actually died from it.

 

Sure we do.

 

The problem is you don't understand the process for generating a death certificate, so you believe whatever your internet friends tell you about Covid deaths.

 

Yes, the overnight reports included anyone who died who tested positive for Covid, but the historical reports are based on death certificate data, which lists the primary cause of death - and for more than a million Americans,  their death certificate says they died OF Covid, not with Covid.

16 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

Never mind about the CDC.

 

If anyone has had the jab, they are more likely to get vax-related illnesses than the un-jabbed. Maybe death too.

 

 

False.

 

The actual data has been posted here many times, proving you are wrong.

 

About 1 in 1500 died from Covid.

 

About 1 in a million died from vaccine side effects.

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

You misread it.

 

Immune Impacts: The large number of mutations in this variant raises concerns of greater escape from existing immunity from vaccines and previous infections compared with other recent variants.

 

This means "concerns of greater excape if you have had Covid or been vaccinated", period. 

 

Their "clarification" is pathetic. I love the use of the term "Suggest". Is that like their initial "suggestion" that vaccination offered 90%+ immunity? Laughable.

Yes, but the unvaccinated are at much greater risk from death from new variants than those who are vaccinated.

On 9/22/2023 at 11:27 AM, 248900_1469958220 said:

The more time passes....the more info comes out...the more I am very glad i did NOT fall for taking an MRNA vaccine.....I feel sorry for those that did. They simply dont know the long term consequences...and it aint looking great so far. 

That’s what most people would say if they weren’t hospitalized.

 

I remember on the news seeing bodies stacked up in freezer trucks outside the hospitals in the USA. They did not have room for the bodies!

 

There was also footage of mass graves in places like India and poorer countries.

4 hours ago, owl sees all said:

Not only didn't I know, but I don't believe it.

 

You are certainly a MSM champion.

If I recall correctly, you don't believe that the COVID-19 virus exists, or that the virus is the cause of the disease.

 

However, some of your fellow Covid Deniers believe the virus was human engineered. Do you believe that to be the case?