Jump to content

Thailand-Russia relations remain strong, but at what cost?


webfact

Recommended Posts

In Beijing five days ago,  Putin initiated and invited Srettha for a short gathering.  It surprised Srettha and the Thai entourage.   So why not ?  it does not hurt Thailand a bit,  but there is an opportunity out there. 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sscc said:

In Beijing five days ago,  Putin initiated and invited Srettha for a short gathering.  It surprised Srettha and the Thai entourage.   So why not ?  it does not hurt Thailand a bit,  but there is an opportunity out there. 

 

How do you know  " It surprised Srettha and the Thai entourage."  where you there !!!!!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Des1 said:

It does hurt Thailand, in many ways.It's very much about choosing sides and Thailand's actions will not go unnoticed.

Would you be able to give just one or two examples of how it actually hurts Thailand? 

  • Confused 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tom H said:

Maybe in a delay on the ratification of the European Free Trade agreement with Thailand?

Well if we are going to fair about this, --Punishing people that are increasing their trade with Russia, then we (The West) might want stop trading so much Saudi & with China..........

Oh wait a minute, My new Iphone.

 

Maybe not. then...lets just give Thailand a kick., seems to be the safer option..............:coffee1:

  • Confused 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, John Drake said:

It is clear that Thailand has chosen to be a Chinese satrapy. I think this pretty much seals the deal for most of mainland Southeast Asia. Accordingly, the US needs immediately to stop funneling money and investment into Thailand. So too should it stop dreaming that Vietnam is an alternative. The Vietnamese are just trying to leverage money out of the US. They will never realign from China. That leaves Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar firmly in China's grip. If the US still wants to fund and build up a country in the region, it should refocus on the Philippines, which has strong cultural, political, and military ties to the US. The Philippines' population is better educated and more capable of participating with the US as an economic partner. But the US should go cold turkey on Thailand. Cancel Cobra Gold immediately, raise import tariffs on Thai goods to match Thai tariffs, curtail Thai ownership of US property and companies, and put Thailand immediately under sanctions if it allows Chinese companies to relocate to Thailand in order to evade existing sanctions on them. Sever all military and political connections--all that does is provide information that will go directly to China. Let Thailand be free to act in its best interests. The US is free to do so as well. And it is no longer in the US' best interests to waste anymore time and resources on Thailand.

yes let them run to china and russia there economies are booming

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sammieuk1 said:

What part are you not understanding Srettha Putin is a wanted war criminal for untold amounts of terrorism around the world you should be chining him not sucking him you have gone Ruble blind and its disgusting 🤔 

On wanted trumped up charges about removing unaccompanied children from a war zone. Grow up will you? Read something about these issues instead of swallowing BBC or CNN propaganda hook line and sinker.

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 4
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thailand-Russia relations remain strong, but at what cost?

A few thousand angry, p*ssed-off, Russia-hating Western expats?

Other than that, the mutually beneficial business trade and tourism should be a plus for both countries.
If you're trading, you're not fighting.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, connda said:

Thailand-Russia relations remain strong, but at what cost?

A few thousand angry, p*ssed-off, Russia-hating Western expats?

Other than that, the mutually beneficial business trade and tourism should be a plus for both countries.
If you're trading, you're not fighting.

It's not really Russia hating.

It's about specific things that Russia is doing under their genocidal war criminal dictator Putin. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tom H said:

Maybe in a delay on the ratification of the European Free Trade agreement with Thailand?

 

Vietnam has one, btw.

Big success.

Big success for who? The Vietnamese don't have multinationals and big brands. It will be used by the Chinese and others to set up manufacturing there and funnel goods to EU tariff free,  same way as Australia gets a lot of "Thai" cars.

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, retarius said:

On wanted trumped up charges about removing unaccompanied children from a war zone. Grow up will you? Read something about these issues instead of swallowing BBC or CNN propaganda hook line and sinker.

so you think  the ICC charges against Putin are false, think you should read the ICC charges  and you dont belive in war crimes like this  hang your head in shame, this is just the start of his wae crimes

17 March 2023, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “the Court”) issued warrants of arrest for two individuals in the context of the situation in Ukraine: Mr Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Ms Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova.

Mr Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, born on 7 October 1952, President of the Russian Federation, is allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation (under articles 8(2)(a)(vii) and 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute). The crimes were allegedly committed in Ukrainian occupied territory at least from 24 February 2022. There are reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Putin bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes, (i) for having committed the acts directly, jointly with others and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), and (ii) for his failure to exercise control properly over civilian and military subordinates who committed the acts, or allowed for their commission, and who were under his effective authority and control, pursuant to superior responsibility (article 28(b) of the Rome Statute).

Pre-Trial Chamber II considered, based on the Prosecution’s applications of 22 February 2023, that there are reasonable grounds to believe that each suspect bears responsibility for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population and that of unlawful transfer of population from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation, in prejudice of Ukrainian children.

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...