stevenl Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Just now, EVENKEEL said: Mayorkas wasn't voted in, what election are you talking about? Theoretically biden could be in office for 5 more years, and you're suggesting we should keep mayorkas in his position regardless of the damage he's causing by his dereliction of duty. What impeachable offences has he committed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post EVENKEEL Posted February 16 Popular Post Share Posted February 16 10 minutes ago, stevenl said: What impeachable offences has he committed? In the second impeachment article, the committee Republicans accused Mayorkas of "knowingly making false statements to Congress and the American people and avoiding lawful oversight in order to obscure the devastating consequences of his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law and carry out his statutory duties." The committee pointed to previous testimony from Mayorkas, when he confirmed that the border was "closed" and said the department had "operational control" of the border, as evidence of his false statements to Congress. It also argued that Mayorkas had breached the public trust by "refusing to carry out his statutory duty to control the border and guard against illegal entry." I'll let you find the first article of impeachment. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post stevenl Posted February 16 Popular Post Share Posted February 16 3 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said: In the second impeachment article, the committee Republicans accused Mayorkas of "knowingly making false statements to Congress and the American people and avoiding lawful oversight in order to obscure the devastating consequences of his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law and carry out his statutory duties." The committee pointed to previous testimony from Mayorkas, when he confirmed that the border was "closed" and said the department had "operational control" of the border, as evidence of his false statements to Congress. It also argued that Mayorkas had breached the public trust by "refusing to carry out his statutory duty to control the border and guard against illegal entry." I'll let you find the first article of impeachment. Lol, time for Congress to impeach itself. "knowingly making false statements". 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 (edited) 23 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said: Mayorkas wasn't voted in, what election are you talking about? Uh, the freaking presidential election. I case you were unaware the Prez gets to name his own cabinet. Or are you worried the border scam isn't working, again? Edited February 16 by mikebike 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVENKEEL Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 13 minutes ago, mikebike said: Uh, the freaking presidential election. I case you were unaware the Prez gets to name his own cabinet. Or are you worried the border scam isn't working, again? Perhaps time to adjust medications. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tug Posted February 16 Popular Post Share Posted February 16 3 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said: Perhaps time to adjust medications. Good for you!I hope your doctor is a talented alchemist he certainly will need all his talents here’s to hoping you have a good outcome! 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 16 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said: Perhaps time to adjust medications. You'll get it right eventually. 😃 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 32 minutes ago, mikebike said: You'll get it right eventually. 😃 No, he won't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said: Mayorkas wasn't voted in, what election are you talking about? Theoretically biden could be in office for 5 more years, and you're suggesting we should keep mayorkas in his position regardless of the damage he's causing by his dereliction of duty. Hilarious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 hours ago, EVENKEEL said: you're suggesting we should keep mayorkas in his position regardless of the damage he's causing by his dereliction of duty. No, we are suggesting they don't continue with performative non-governing farces which have no hope of passing the senate. A waste of everyone's time and money for ZERO actual change. How about passing new border laws? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCauto Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 On 2/15/2024 at 9:08 AM, Berkshire said: Some of you MAGA guys crack me up. This was a pointless exercise. This impeachment will be DOA at the Senate and Mayorkas will continue on as before. So what have these nutters in the House accomplished? Zero....except waste time and money that could be better spent on actually governing. They also killed the bipartisan bill that was negotiated specifically to address the immigration issues that the GOP are complaining endlessly about. The reason of course is that Diaper Donnie deemed it potentially injurious to his campaign to get away with high crimes and misdemeanors - as in actual ones that are in a court of law and which have reams of evidence to support the charges. What exactly was Secretary Mayorkas' high crime and misdemeanor here? How is the House GOP not complicit in any of these so-called charges seeing as they had a bill in place to address this that was bipartisan and which they then walked away from due to pressure from the Far Right Extremists. If you're so convinced, care to make a bet with me for real money that there will be no court cases or charges against Mayorkas? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berkshire Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 7 minutes ago, JCauto said: They also killed the bipartisan bill that was negotiated specifically to address the immigration issues that the GOP are complaining endlessly about. The reason of course is that Diaper Donnie deemed it potentially injurious to his campaign to get away with high crimes and misdemeanors - as in actual ones that are in a court of law and which have reams of evidence to support the charges. What exactly was Secretary Mayorkas' high crime and misdemeanor here? How is the House GOP not complicit in any of these so-called charges seeing as they had a bill in place to address this that was bipartisan and which they then walked away from due to pressure from the Far Right Extremists. If you're so convinced, care to make a bet with me for real money that there will be no court cases or charges against Mayorkas? The GOP has now admitted their entire immigration agenda. They absolutely have no interest in fixing the problem at the border. They only want to complain about it and blame the POTUS. Their scheme will be broadcasted to all of America over and over again until November. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVENKEEL Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 hour ago, mikebike said: You'll get it right eventually. 😃 Good one, even though you know I was speaking of your health. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 21 hours ago, sirineou said: republican Election political theater for the consumption of the feeble minded trampazees. otherwise insignificant move that is going nowhere and a waste of taxpayer money. otherwise insignificant move that is going nowhere and a waste of taxpayer money. Sooooo, it was OK for the Dems to waste taxpayers money on their 2 that went nowhere, but it's different when the GOP does it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 16 minutes ago, Berkshire said: The GOP has now admitted their entire immigration agenda. They absolutely have no interest in fixing the problem at the border. They only want to complain about it and blame the POTUS. Their scheme will be broadcasted to all of America over and over again until November. The situation was created by Biden, so why wouldn't they use it to show how useless he is? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 (edited) 4 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said: Good one, even though you know I was speaking of your health. You need to be more clear. From your post and response, it seems most folk, including me, thought you were referring to yourself. Edited February 16 by mikebike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berkshire Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 12 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: The situation was created by Biden, so why wouldn't they use it to show how useless he is? The Senate tried to fix it. That bi-partisan bill was heavily tilted towards what the GOP wanted in terms of immigration reform. It would have been a huge win for the GOP in terms of offering a real solution. But the House rejected it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sirineou Posted February 16 Popular Post Share Posted February 16 39 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: otherwise insignificant move that is going nowhere and a waste of taxpayer money. Sooooo, it was OK for the Dems to waste taxpayers money on their 2 that went nowhere, but it's different when the GOP does it! There was no waste of money when the democrats impeached trump there we actual crimes and . misdemeanors, there were extensive hearings What were the crimes against Mayorkas? being policies republicans did not like. A piece of advice, if I might. you got to stop drinking so much coffee not good for you 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 26 minutes ago, sirineou said: There was no waste of money when the democrats impeached trump there we actual crimes and . misdemeanors, there were extensive hearings What were the crimes against Mayorkas? being policies republicans did not like. A piece of advice, if I might. you got to stop drinking so much coffee not good for you Pull the other one, it's got bells on it. IMO you are letting your TDS show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 10 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: Pull the other one, it's got bells on it. IMO you are letting your TDS show. That moronic insult is so incredibly tired. Again -- it is the maga cult fans who are deranged. Deranged to the point of seeking a dictatorship over democracy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing Posted February 16 Popular Post Share Posted February 16 1 hour ago, Berkshire said: The Senate tried to fix it. That bi-partisan bill was heavily tilted towards what the GOP wanted in terms of immigration reform. It would have been a huge win for the GOP in terms of offering a real solution. But the House rejected it. Yes they took orders from their fascist dear leader who it turns out does NOT want to fix it. Rather he wants to preserve the problem to be his top campaign issues. What an anti-American sleazeball! The people elect representatives to fix problems, not worship a thuggish mafia style dictator. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said: otherwise insignificant move that is going nowhere and a waste of taxpayer money. Sooooo, it was OK for the Dems to waste taxpayers money on their 2 that went nowhere, but it's different when the GOP does it! It's different when you have no high crimes and misdemeanors to charge which they did have to impeach Trump two times. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 (edited) 1 hour ago, Jingthing said: It's different when you have no high crimes and misdemeanors to charge which they did have to impeach Trump two times. You have to excuse Thaibachlover, he is a New Zealander, Need I say more? Edited February 16 by sirineou 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted February 16 Popular Post Share Posted February 16 12 minutes ago, sirineou said: You have to excuse Thaibachlover, he is a New Zealander, Need I say more? And don't forget he's not a Trumper! 😆 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now