I thought that the judgement was purely about in whose territory the temple complex was. The dispute is all about the surrounding land that was not part of the court judgement. Is that correct? Wouldn't it be helpful to publish a few facts rather than people quoting one side or the other. Again I thought that the original agreement made with the French was that the border was the water shed. How difficult is it to determine where the water shed is?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now